Go back to the interactive dataset
2021 Cities Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessments
| Row number | Questionnaire Name | Account Number | Account Name | Country | CDP Region | ParentSection | Section | Question Number | Question Name | RowNumber | RowName | Publication title and attach the document | Web link | Year of publication or approval from local government | Boundary of assessment relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | Explanation of boundary choice where the assessment boundary differs from the city boundary | Primary author of assessment | Does the assessment identify vulnerable populations? | Areas/sectors covered by the risk and vulnerability assessment | Please explain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 501 | Cities 2021 | 50681 | Município de Funchal | Portugal | Europe | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | ||||||||||
| 502 | Cities 2021 | 50713 | Chuncheon City | Republic of Korea | East Asia | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | 춘천시 기후변화 적응대책 세부 시행계획 수립(2020~2024) | 2019 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | Regional / state / provincial government | Yes | Education; Emergency Management; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Public health; Water Supply & Sanitation | 건강, 농업, 재난/재해, 산림/생태계, 물관리 부문에 대하여 춘천시와 연관성이 있는 30개의 세부항목에 대한 취약성 평가 | |||
| 503 | Cities 2021 | 50713 | Chuncheon City | Republic of Korea | East Asia | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 2 | 춘천시 기후변화 적응대책 세부 시행계획 수립(2020~2024) | 2019 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | Regional / state / provincial government | Yes | Education; Emergency Management; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Public health; Water Supply & Sanitation | 건강, 농업, 재난/재해, 산림/생태계, 물관리 부문에 대하여 춘천시와 연관성이 있는 30개의 세부항목에 대한 취약성 평가 | |||
| 504 | Cities 2021 | 50782 | Dhaka City | Bangladesh | South and West Asia | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 505 | Cities 2021 | 50792 | Commune de Monaco | Monaco | Europe | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Stratégie d'adaptation au changement climatique | 2015 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | L’étude s’inscrit dans le cadre de l’évaluation de la vulnérabilité du territoire monégasque au regard des aléas climatiques actuels et futurs. Elle constitue la première étape de la démarche qui vise à définir et à construire la stratégie territoriale d’adaptation au changement climatique monégasque.La synthèse du diagnostic de vulnérabilité s’appuie sur la réalisation de deux études documentaires préalables et leur croisement avec la consultation des experts locaux.Un premier tome « Actualisation et consolidation des projections à l’échelle de la Principauté de Monaco » se compose de l’analyse des aléas observés dans le passé et à venir.Un second tome « Approche bibliographique de la problématique d’adaptation au changement climatique pour la Principauté de Monaco » dresse un premier constat de l’exposition de la Principauté aux changements climatiques en s’appuyant sur une analyse multithématique.La consultation des experts permettra ensuite de croiser et de compléter ces éléments afin d’en extraire une analyse transversale et multithématique de la vulnérabilité au changement climatique de la Principauté de Monaco. Les entretiens sont l’occasion de recueillir la perception des experts et leur connaissance des changements climatiques passés et futurs sur le territoire, d’identifier les initiatives existantes et d’interroger leurs expertises pour définir les priorités d’action de la stratégie.Le panel d’experts comprend aussi bien des spécialistes de la climatologie que des spécialistes issus de secteurs d’activités potentiellement ou particulièrement concernés et exposés, par le changement climatique. | Consultant | Yes | Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Public health; Residential; Tourism; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | |||
| 506 | Cities 2021 | 50794 | Prefeitura Municipal de Caieiras | Brazil | Latin America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 507 | Cities 2021 | 51075 | City of Shenzhen | China | East Asia | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 508 | Cities 2021 | 51079 | Guatemala City | Guatemala | Latin America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 509 | Cities 2021 | 51374 | Prefeitura de Rio Branco | Brazil | Latin America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Plano de Contigência Operacional de Enchente. Ano base 2019 | www.pmrb.ac.gov.br | 2019 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | Regional / state / provincial government | Yes | Emergency Management; Public health | |||
| 510 | Cities 2021 | 52638 | Prefeitura de Aracaju | Brazil | Latin America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 511 | Cities 2021 | 52894 | City of Winston-Salem, NC | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Northern Piedmont Hazard Mitigation Plan (plan is too large to attach) | https://ptrc.sharepoint.com/Planning%20Team%20Site/Shared%20Documents/Forms/StormwaterSmart.aspx?id=%2FPlanning%20Team%20Site%2FShared%20Documents%2FDisaster%20Recovery%2F20200701%5FNPiedmont%5FRHMP%5FFINAL%2Epdf&parent=%2FPlanning%20Team%20Site%2FShared%20Documents%2FDisaster%20Recovery&p=true&originalPath=aHR0cHM6Ly9wdHJjLnNoYXJlcG9pbnQuY29tLzpiOi9nL1BsYW5uaW5nJTIwVGVhbSUyMFNpdGUvRVlqWTAxZlZLX0JOb3U1ZzM4c3AtNHNCT25NSFQzSEx4TGhxZU42Q2pPX1dtUT9ydGltZT1ySXd0d3JRMDJVZw | 2020 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | The assessment's boundary covers the city of Winston-Salem as well as the other smaller jurisdictions in Forsyth County including Bethania, Clemmons, Kernersville, Lewisville, Rural Hall, Tobaccoville, Walkertown and the Unincorporated areas of Forsyth County. This is because the Office of Emergency Management is a joint City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County Office. Additionally, the entire plan includes six other counties since it is a regional plan. Therefore the county boundary was necessary to use in this assessment. | Relevant city department | Yes | Commercial; Education; Emergency Management; Public health; Residential | For each natural, technological, and other hazard threats assessed, the number of and cost of damages for commercial, residential and public buildings at risk were identified, as well as the risk to both the elderly and child populations. Certain critical facilities were included in the assessment as well, which for Winston-Salem/Forsyth County include a number of medical facilities (public health sector), schools (education sector), and Fire/EMS/Police stations (Emergency Management sector). | |
| 512 | Cities 2021 | 52897 | City of Aspen, CO | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Climate Change & Aspen: An Update on Impacts to Guide Resiliency Planning & Stakeholder Engagement | https://www.cityofaspen.com/Archive.aspx?AMID=59 | 2014 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | Aspen tracks and reports community-wide emissions within its Emissions Inventory Boundary (EIB), which includes areas that lie outside of City limits. The geographic boundary of the City of Aspen is situated within its Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). In addition to what lies within the geographic boundary, the UGB also includes the Mountain Valley, Red Mountain, North 40, West Buttermilk, and Tiehack residential areas as well as the Aspen School District campus, Aspen-Pitkin County Airport, and the Aspen Airport Business Center. The EIB covers nearly the same area of the UGB, but also includes the Starwood and White Horse Springs areas of the McLain Flats residential area. The EIB also extends beyond the UGB to include the electricity used to run the ski lifts and facilities on Aspen Mountain, Aspen Highlands, and Buttermilk ski areas because the base facilities and many lift stations are within the EIB.The EIB has been used since 2004 under the rationale that this geographic area represents Aspen’s core functionality and is a part of Aspen’s foundational economy. Aspen population within the EIB is 9,003, but within City limits the population is only 6,879. Hence, a significant portion of the population that influences and contributes to Aspen economy lives outside of City limits, but within the EIB. In 2004, Aspen’s first greenhouse gas emissions inventory year, stakeholders determined that the Aspen community should take responsibility for emissions occurring within the EIB. The extended boundary approach ensures that Aspen measures, reports, and attempts to reduce emissions in all areas that see emission-producing activity directly due to the City’s influence. Therefore, the EIB is used in both emissions tracking, goal setting, and this vulnerability assessment. | Other, please specify: Aspen Global Change Institute | No | Commercial; Community & Culture; Emergency Management; Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Public health; Residential; Tourism; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | ||
| 513 | Cities 2021 | 53241 | City of Darwin | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 514 | Cities 2021 | 53254 | City of Hobart | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Regional Climate Adaptation Strategy, Southern Tasmania 2013 - 2020 | https://www.hobartcity.com.au/City-services/Environment/Climate-and-energy/Adapting-to-a-changing-climate | 2018 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | Covers the 12 Southern Tasmanian municipal (local government) areas of:1)Brighton Council2)Central Highlands3)City of Hobart4)Clarence City Council5)Derwent Valley/New Norfolk Council6)Glamorgan-Spring Bay Council7)Glenorchy City Council8)Huon Valley Council9)Kingborough Council10) Southern Midlands11) Sorell Council12) Tasman Council | Other, please specify: 3 Councils officers seconded from: City of Hobart (urban) Katrina Graham ; Brighton Council (peri-urban) Oliver Heyward and Southern Midlands (rural) Graham Green | Yes | Commercial; Community & Culture; Education; Emergency Management; Energy; Land use planning; Other, please specify: Areas of direct jurisdiction of Tasmanian local government such as: development and strategic planning, environmental health, management of local government assets roads (not highways), storm water, waste management and emergency management; Public health; Residential; Tourism; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | The Adaptation Plan was, in 2018, extended to 2020 to allow for its review and update through the aforementioned project the ‘Tasmanian Local Government Climate Strategy and Council Climate Action Plans.' The Adaptation Plan considers areas of relevance to local government at a regional level where they have: direct jurisdictional and legislative control; areas of influence and more broadly areas of concern. It also identifies key stakeholders across the private and public sectors where jurisdictional responsibilities overlap or relate to an adaptation outcomes and increased resilience across communities. The City has migrated relevant risks and adaptation actions from the Regional Adaptation Strategy into its: corporate Strategic Plan 2020- 2029, Strategic Risk Register, Asset Management Strategy and Asset Management Plans which are annually reviewed and reported to Executive Leadership Team and Audit Panel | |
| 515 | Cities 2021 | 53254 | City of Hobart | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 2 | Sustainable Hobart Action Plan | https://www.hobartcity.com.au/files/assets/public/strategies-and-plans/sustainable-hobart-action-plan-2020-2025.pdf | 2021 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | The boundary covers the municipal area (local government area) of the City of Hobart | Relevant city department | Yes | Other, please specify: Jurisdictional responsibilities of local government and broader action to increase climate resilience and preparedness across the City's communities. | Covers areas that local government is responsible for including service delivery to communities such as: roads (level 2 & 3), waste management, environmental health; development and strategic planning, natural resource management (including waterways, bush fire, biodiversity and coastal), storm water management; emergency management. The Goals of the Plan are: 1. To sustainably meet the rapid changes in Hobart’s demographics and population 2. To create a path to a zero-emissions future for the City and community 3. To deliver on the community’s vision for Hobart, described in the document Hobart: A community vision for our island capital (2018)4. To prepare our city to withstand storm, sea level rise, flood, bushfire and other natural hazards5. To challenge the people of Hobart with exciting, smart, innovative and affordable solutions to energy management, transport and other areas6. To collaborate with all areas of the City and external stakeholders to drive efficiency in our processes, development and actions7. To provide leadership and collaboration at local, regional, national and international levels 8. To deliver better and more efficient services and programs for the people of HobartThe Plan contains over 40 individual actions in six areas:1. Leadership: Initiatives involving the City influencing, educating or collaborating with other governments and stakeholders2. Mobility: Initiatives to move around the city in more sustainable ways 3. Energy: Initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and use renewables more effectively and at lower cost4. Resilience: Initiatives that make Hobart better prepared for the changes climate change is bringing5. Waste: Initiatives to make better and more efficient use of resources and prevent them becoming pollutants at end of-life6. Governance: Initiatives that utilise the City of Hobart’s legislative frameworks to effect change.The Plan includes the specific actions:RESI-08 A SAFE AND RESILIENT CITYScanning, mapping and monitoring environmental threats to the city. The City is using projections and modelling to understand what a future climate means for Hobart and its assets and services. This understanding will enable the City’s programs to provide natural, social and built responses to climate hazards. Working with other areas of the City and surrounding councils, these programs include actions such as: future-proofing stormwater assets and protecting overland flow paths, reducing flooding impacts, managing the threat of fire, strategic land-use planning and minimising coastal hazards.Outcomes in this area will, for instance, be the use of 3D mapping of the city to assist the City’s Bushland teams to identify potential locations for trapping water on our surrounding hills to help moisten, green and fireproof our environment and cool the local microclimate. Also important is increasing the community’s awareness of the benefits of integrated water cycle management (e.g. stormwater detention, porous gardens, vegetation cover), preserving open overland flow paths, and improving the community’s awareness of flood and fire risk at their own property.TIMEFRAME: Short–Medium ACTIVITY TYPE: Climate Considered Management Plans GOVE- 01LOCAL GOVERNMENT COLLABORATIONSBuild inter-council knowledge and understanding.In conjunction with the Hobart City Deal working groups We will build on and improve the capacity for local governments to collaborate in regional planning, transport links, data and information sharing, and creating alignment in response to a more sustainable Southern Tasmania. The City will continue to work toward climate safe and smart outcomes across southern Tasmania in the delivery of the work program for the Southern Tasmanian Council Authority’s Regional Climate Change Initiative, by developing a Regional Climate Strategy (mitigation and adaptation) and Council Climate Action Plans and a Regional Coastal Hazards Strategy. TIMEFRAME: Short ACTIVITY TYPE: Engagement / Research / Publication | |
| 516 | Cities 2021 | 53254 | City of Hobart | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 3 | City of Hobart Strategic Risk Register | internal document | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | Covers the city of Hobart municipal area | Dedicated city team | Yes | Other, please specify: Corporate risk assessment - Integrated Risk Manager | The risk management tool used by the city [CAMMS] to identify manage and respond to risk including climate risk Risk 3 Appropriately adapt to and manage environmental impacts and climate change to ensure a sustainable Hobart - details treatment plans include: Flooding - urban stormwater Coastal Asset Management BiodiversityBushfire Waste Management Strategies and policies | ||
| 517 | Cities 2021 | 53829 | City of Kingston, ON | Canada | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 518 | Cities 2021 | 53860 | City of Wilmington, NC | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Community Resilience Pilot Project | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | SLR and storm surge from more intense coastal storms pose challenges to existing water and wastewater infrastructure throughout the City of Wilmington, in the service area of Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA), , and in unincorporated areas of New Hanover County. Much of the area is low-lying, and water and wastewater infrastructure, including underground pipelines, pump stations, treatment facilities, and groundwater resources, are potentially vulnerable to rising sea levels and storm surge. | Consultant | Yes | Energy; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | ||||
| 519 | Cities 2021 | 53879 | City of Jersey City, NJ | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Resiliency Master Plan | https://us.ftp.opendatasoft.com/analyzejerseycity/files/Master%20Plans/resiliency-mp-adopted-061417.pdf | 2017 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | The Resiliency Master plan is established to reduce the impacts on future storm events. Jersey City is committed to taking steps to protect its people and commerce, its infrastructure and history. To guide its direction, Jersey City has established the following vision for the future:Jersey City seeks to protect its valuable social, historic, and economic assets against the changing environment and increased risk of storm events through innovative design and infrastructure solutions. By identifying vulnerable populations, neighborhoods, and gaps in the City’s preparedness, Jersey City resolves to implement strategies that will ensure that it remains a desirable and dependable place to live, work, and invest for generations to come.It is the intent of this document, as well as the Adaptation and Green Infrastructure Master Plans which follow, to help this vision come to fruition. By understanding the vulnerabilities of Jersey City and the geographic areas of the city which are points of particular weakness, real solutions can be considered. From infrastructure such as underground storage to surface treatments and landscaping, from levees to living shorelines, there are many opportunities to improve the resilience of Jersey City that will be recommended as effective and viable approaches to handling water inundation. Additionally, programmatic approaches will also be important, including emergency preparedness, public awareness campaigns, and incentives for energy efficiency and flood resiliency. Together, these approaches will help protect all those who live, work, and visit Jersey City. | Relevant city department | Yes | Energy; Transport | The impact of hurricane Sandy58 revealed a region-wide exposure to multiple hazards and risks. Power blackouts, severely contaminated storm waters, evacuation of residential communities and massive disruptions to public transport are just a few examples of the systemic nature of risk. Layering maps of those urban systems enables us to determine where an intervention could address the largest portfolio of risks and hazards. A citywide analysis has been conducted, layering a maximum spectrum of risks and vulnerabilities, combining flood risk with pollution risks, social vulnerability, critical infrastructure vulnerability and economic development vulnerability. This study was developed as an analytical process to identify the areas in the city that are at greatest risk, and by that aim to guidethis Plan’s priority investments in adaptation measures. The underlying argument is that a dollar is best spent when it addresses the widest variety of risks (including but also beyond flood risk) to the largest plurality of stakeholders (starting with vulnerable populations and economies). | |
| 520 | Cities 2021 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 521 | Cities 2021 | 53959 | City of Fayetteville, AR | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Climate Resilience Assessment | https://www.fayetteville-ar.gov/DocumentCenter/View/18820/UA-and-CoF-Climate-Resilience-Assessment--2018-V6 | 2018 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | Other, please specify: University of Arkansas Office for Sustainability | Yes | Commercial; Community & Culture; Emergency Management; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Industrial; Land use planning; Public health; Residential; Tourism; Water Supply & Sanitation | |||
| 522 | Cities 2021 | 54026 | City of Tacoma, WA | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Tacoma Climate Resilience Study | http://cms.cityoftacoma.org/Sustainability/Climate_Resilience_Study_Final_2016.pdf | 2016 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | Some utility service is provided outside the City boundaries but this study focuses on risks to assets and systems within the City's jurisdictional boundary. | Consultant | Yes | Commercial; Community & Culture; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Industrial; Land use planning; Law & Order; Public health; Residential; Transport; Waste Management | ||
| 523 | Cities 2021 | 54027 | City of St. John's, NL | Canada | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 524 | Cities 2021 | 54029 | City of Spokane, WA | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 525 | Cities 2021 | 54030 | City of Little Rock, AR | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 526 | Cities 2021 | 54034 | City of Grand Rapids, MI | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Grand Rapids Climate Resilience Report | https://www.grandrapidsmi.gov/files/assets/public/departments/human-resources/office-of-sustainability/reports-and-documents/climate-resliency-report.pdf | 2012 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | The report covers the City of Grand Rapids, but also more broadly the surrounding community and other parts of West Michigan | Other, please specify: Was completed by the West Michigan Environmental Action Coalition (WMEAC), in partnership with the City of Grand Rapids, and Grand Valley State University. | Yes | Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Transport; Waste Management; Water Supply & Sanitation | This is the first attempt to comprehensively understand vulnerabilities to climate change within our community’s environmental, social, and economic systems. Over a 10-month period, WMEAC interviewed more than 25 experts from a diverse range of fields, including insurance, academia, regional planning, transportation, food systems, emergency preparedness, sustainability, environmental services, community infrastructure, forestry, finance, low-impact development, built environment, community essential needs, fisheries, engineering, and energy. | |
| 527 | Cities 2021 | 54034 | City of Grand Rapids, MI | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 2 | Climate and Socio-economic Vulnerability Assessment for Stormwater in Grand Rapids | 2021 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | The focus was on our stormwater systems and infrastructure so we focused specifically on the City of Grand Rapids proper. However, we understand that there are many factors outside of the City that will influence our system - most notably the quantity and quality of water being discharged into the Grand River upstream from the city. | Dedicated city team | Yes | Water Supply & Sanitation | We are in the final phases of completing this assessment. The Office of Sustainability and Performance Management has taken the lead and has partnered closely with our stormwater expert in the Environmental Services Department, our Emergency Management Administrator and diverse community stakeholders including members from our Stormwater Oversight Committee. The City received grant funding via the Great Lakes Integrated Sciences and Assessment to participate in this project. In this report, readers will find more information about how changes in weather and long-term climate have already impacted Grand Rapids and details about projected changes in climate relevant to the City. Further, the report provides insights into what those changes might mean in terms of on-the-ground impacts to our stormwater systems, an assessment of Grand Rapids’s overall stormwater-system vulnerability to these changes, and which segments of the community may be most vulnerable. Finally, this report provides some initial suggestions on what we, as a community, can do to prepare our stormwater system and those it serves for climate-related impacts. | ||
| 528 | Cities 2021 | 54034 | City of Grand Rapids, MI | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 3 | Hazard Mitigation Plan | https://www.accesskent.com/Sheriff/pdfs/GGRHazMitPlan_2017.pdf | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | Our Hazard Mitigation Plan is completed in partnership with Kent and Ottawa Counties. | Consultant | Yes | Commercial; Community & Culture; Education; Emergency Management; Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Industrial; Information & Communications Technology; Public health; Residential; Transport; Waste Management; Water Supply & Sanitation | The last version of this plan was published in 2017 and we are in the process of updating the plan, which will be completed in mid 2022. | ||
| 529 | Cities 2021 | 54037 | City of Des Moines, IA | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan | https://dmampo.org/polk-county-hmp/ | 2019 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | 1) Official Plan Participants: The following cities are bi-county/multiple-county cities that are either apart of the Des Moines Metro Area that have portions of their city limits in other counties, or citiesthat have the majority of their corporate limits in Polk County. These cities will be invited as officialplan participants in the Polk County plan. The Risk Assessment will include incorporation of analysis ofbuilding exposure/critical facilities of the entire city limits for these jurisdictions: Clive-parts in Dallas County, Urbandale-parts in Dallas County, West Des Moines-parts in Dallas County, Madison County, & Warren County, Grimes-parts in Dallas County, Des Moines-parts in Warren County, and Mitchellville-parts in Jasper County.2) Stakeholder Participants: To provide a comprehensive analysis, the Risk Assessment includesincorporated areas of several cities that have a portion of their city limits in Polk County, but areconsidered official cities of adjacent counties. The Risk Assessment will include analysis of buildingexposure/critical facilities ONLY for those portions of the incorporated areas that are within the PolkCounty boundary. Although these cities are not official participants of the Polk County Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, they are stakeholders in the planning process and as such, wereinvited to planning meetings and to comment on plan drafts. Carlisle-parts in Warren County, Granger-parts in Dallas County, Norwalk-parts in Warren County, and Sheldahl-parts in Story County & Boone County.Polk County and the incorporated areas that participated in this plan update developed a Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan that was approved by FEMA on July 16, 2014 (hereafter referredto as the 2014 Polk County Hazard Mitigation Plan). Therefore, this current planning effort serves toupdate the previous plan. | Regional / state / provincial government | Yes | Community & Culture; Emergency Management; Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Information & Communications Technology; Law & Order; Public health; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | The purpose of hazard mitigation is to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from hazards. Polk County and participating jurisdictions developed this multi-jurisdictional local hazard mitigation plan update to reduce future losses to the County and its communities resulting from hazard events. The plan was prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and to achieve eligibility for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grant Programs.Over the course of 10-months the Des Moines Area MPO worked with Polk County Emergency Management to update their Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. The results of this process are found below. A unique example for the city of Des Moines, is the identification and competitive market-based acquisition of repetitive flood prone private residential properties by the City. Residents voluntarily relocated to non-flood prone areas and the City is currently working on plans to repurpose the properties with sustainable flood mitigation systems and public parks and recreation amenities. | |
| 530 | Cities 2021 | 54037 | City of Des Moines, IA | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 2 | Des Moines Climate Action and Adaptation Plan | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | Consultant | Yes | Commercial; Community & Culture; Education; Emergency Management; Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Industrial; Land use planning; Other, please specify: Economic development; Land Use and Access, Natural resources; Public health; Residential; Transport; Waste Management; Water Supply & Sanitation | They City's forthcoming Climate Action and Adaptation Plan will incorporate an Risk and Vulnerability Assessment specific to the City of Des Moines. This analysis will inform the climate action planning process and enable the City to prioritize recommended actions more effectively. The RVA will build from the metro-wide RVA conducted in 2019. | ||||
| 531 | Cities 2021 | 54048 | City of Knoxville, TN | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Knox County, City of Knoxville, and Town of Farragut Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan | http://knoxvilletn.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_109478/File/Engineering/Stormwater/Knox_County_Multi_Jurisdictional_Local_HMP.pdf | 2018 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | The City's adopted Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) is a multi-jurisdictional plan encompassing unincorporated areas of Knox County and the incorporated City of Knoxville and Town of Farragut. | Regional / state / provincial government | Yes | Commercial; Education; Emergency Management; Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Industrial; Information & Communications Technology; Land use planning; Public health; Residential; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | The risk assessment addresses a wide range of concerns related to 12 natural hazards (dam failure, drought, earthquake, expansive soils, extreme temperatures, flood, land subsidence/sinkholes, landslide, severe storms, tornadoes, wildfire, and winter storms). | |
| 532 | Cities 2021 | 54060 | City of Greater Sudbury / Grand Sudbury, ON | Canada | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | ICLEI Great Lakes Program Sudbury Final | 2017 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | International organization | Yes | Community & Culture; Education; Emergency Management; Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Industrial; Land use planning; Public health; Residential; Tourism; Transport; Waste Management; Water Supply & Sanitation | ||||
| 533 | Cities 2021 | 54066 | City of Fort Collins, CO | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Climate Smart Larimer County | https://www.larimer.org/sites/default/files/uploads/2021/cslc_framework_11.16.2020_final_2.pdf | 2020 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | Fort Collins is a city in Larimer County, which of course will experience these climate hazards in similar ways. When the region experiences a wildfire or flood, for example, all the cities will be impacted in responding and recovering from it. | Regional / state / provincial government | Yes | Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Industrial; Information & Communications Technology; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | The Climate Smart Larimer County (CSLC) framework provides recommendations for future action that range from building, land use, and energy; economy; emergency management and public safety; watershed, agriculture, open spaces and forestry; public and environmental health; and public works and engineering. The next steps in implementing this framework are engaging further with community members to ensure that the intentions set within CSLC are feasible, equitable, and effective. | |
| 534 | Cities 2021 | 54066 | City of Fort Collins, CO | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 2 | Municipal Sustainability and Adaptation Plan | https://www.fcgov.com/sustainability/files/2019-sustainabilityandadaptationplan.pdf | 2019 | Smaller – covers only part of the city | This plan covers municipal adaptation and resilience, which affect services provided to the community, but doesn't cover all aspects of the community. Because Fort Collins is a municipal utility, it does consider electricity and water supplies. | Dedicated city team | No | Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Information & Communications Technology; Water Supply & Sanitation | The Municipal Sustainability and Adaptation Plan focused on the areas most relevant to the city organization. Goal areas were resilience, public lands, water, waste, greenhouse gas emissions, and safe and healthy workplace. | |
| 535 | Cities 2021 | 54066 | City of Fort Collins, CO | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 3 | Larimer County Hazard Mitigation Plan | https://www.larimer.org/emergency/hazard-mitigation-plan | 2021 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | Fort Collins is a city in Larimer County, which of course will experience these climate hazards in similar ways. When the region experiences a wildfire or flood, for example, all the cities will be impacted in responding and recovering from it. | Regional / state / provincial government | Yes | Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Industrial; Information & Communications Technology; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | ||
| 536 | Cities 2021 | 54070 | City of Eugene, OR | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Regional Climate and Hazards Vulnerability Assessment | http://www.eugene-or.gov/DocumentCenter/View/20644 | 2014 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | The geographic boundary for this assessment is the area within the Eugene urban growth boundary and neighboring Springfield urban growth boundary. Due to the regional nature of some systems and hazards, areas outside of this boundary are discussed within several of the summaries. | Dedicated city team | Yes | Community & Culture; Emergency Management; Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Information & Communications Technology; Law & Order; Public health; Residential; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | ||
| 537 | Cities 2021 | 54070 | City of Eugene, OR | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 2 | Eugene-Springfield Multi-Jurisdictional NATURAL HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN | https://www.eugene-or.gov/DocumentCenter/View/48415/Eugene-SpringfieldAreaMJNHMP2020?bidId= | 2020 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | The geographic boundary for this assessment is the area within the Eugene urban growth boundary and neighboring Springfield urban growth boundary. Due to the regional nature of some systems and hazards, areas outside of this boundary are discussed within several of the summaries. | Dedicated city team | Yes | Community & Culture; Emergency Management; Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Information & Communications Technology; Law & Order; Public health; Residential; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | ||
| 538 | Cities 2021 | 54075 | City of Lakewood, CO | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 539 | Cities 2021 | 54078 | City of Hayward, CA | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Hayward Shoreline Resilience Study | http://www.adaptingtorisingtides.org/project/hayward-shoreline/ | 2015 | Smaller – covers only part of the city | According to the "Hayward Shoreline Resilience Study," "the Hayward Shoreline Resilience Study area was selected for several reasons, including its low elevation, the presence of previous studies of the area and the presence of significant regional and local assets. These assets include regional wastewater infrastructure, the eastern approach to the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge (State Route 92, SR-92), important regional recreation assets, including the Bay Trail and the Hayward Shoreline Interpretive Center and tidal marshes and managed ponds that support Bay species and provide other ecosystem services along the shoreline. While there is no residential development in the study area, the City of Hayward is a community of approximately 150,000 people, who rely on the assets within the study area for the services described above." (page 3, Introduction) | Regional / state / provincial government | No | Community & Culture; Emergency Management; Information & Communications Technology; Land use planning; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | Some assets were evaluated in the study and the six water levels used for the assessment. Assets are vulnerable to intermittent flooding and/or permanent inundation depending on their construction and function. For example, marshes are resilient to short term flooding but plants will die and habitat will be lost if the marsh is permanently inundated. Conversely, Hayward Shoreline Interpretive Center is vulnerable to even short-duration flooding because the facility would be damaged by floodwater and would have to close during repairs. Natural areas such as Cogswell marsh are among the first assets vulnerable to sea level rise and extreme tide impacts. In contrast, wastewater infrastructure is vulnerable at higher water levels. | |
| 540 | Cities 2021 | 54078 | City of Hayward, CA | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 2 | Local Hazard Mitigation Plan | https://www.hayward-ca.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/2016%20City%20of%20Hayward%20Local%20Hazard%20Mitigation%20Plan.pdf | 2016 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | This is a City of Hayward-specific plan which must explore the hazards and mitigation strategies for all areas within the City limits. | Regional / state / provincial government | No | Commercial; Education; Emergency Management; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Industrial; Information & Communications Technology; Land use planning; Public health; Residential; Water Supply & Sanitation | The Hazard Mitigation planning team selected the strategies laid out in this plan to preserve the lives, property, and prosperity of Hayward residents in the event of a natural hazard by lessening the impact of the hazard on people, buildings, and City infrastructure. In service of this goal, our priorities were as follows: 1. Protect the lives of members of the Hayward community. 2. Preserve and maintain functional City property and structures. 3. Maintain the consistent quality delivery of essential City services on which our residents depend. 4. Facilitate timely and holisitc citywide recovery following a hazard. | |
| 541 | Cities 2021 | 54082 | City of Hollywood, FL | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Citywide Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Plan | https://www.hollywoodfl.org/DocumentCenter/View/18401/Vulnerability-Assessment-Report | 2020 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | Consultant | Yes | Commercial; Emergency Management; Public health; Residential; Transport; Waste Management; Water Supply & Sanitation | The assessment covered the effects of extreme heat, extreme precipitation, sea-level rise, and storm surges. These can all have disastrous effects on Hollywood, a city with sizable vulnerable and low-income populations that sits on the east coast of Florida. The assessment analyzes the risk these events pose to the general population directly and also by way of threats to essential services such as water supply and sanitation, waste management, and public security. These then have direct impacts on how the City responds. | ||
| 542 | Cities 2021 | 54084 | City of Guelph, ON | Canada | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 543 | Cities 2021 | 54085 | City of Savannah, GA | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Chatham County Multi-Jurisdictional Pre-Disaster Hazard Mitigation Plan | https://cccdn.blob.core.windows.net/cdn/Files/CEMA/Chatham%20County%20Multi-Jurisdictional%20Pre-Disaster%20Hazard%20Mitigation%20Plan_Final.pdf | 2020 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | Chatham County, GA | Regional / state / provincial government | Yes | Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Industrial; Information & Communications Technology; Transport; Waste Management; Water Supply & Sanitation | ||
| 544 | Cities 2021 | 54088 | City of Peterborough, ON | Canada | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | City of Peterborough Community Climate Change Resiliency Strategy | N/A | 2020 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | Consultant | Yes | Commercial; Community & Culture; Emergency Management; Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Industrial; Public health; Residential; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | As part of the City of Peterborough's commitment to addressing climate change, the municipality enrolled in ICLEI-Canada's Changemaker Project in 2018 to create a community adaptation plan. A diverse stakeholder advisory working group was established composed of local experts, community leadership, organizations, academic institutions, and cross-departmental representation of city departments to guide and provide input into the adaptation plan. Over many months the advisory group and ICLEI BARC staff developed the adaptation plan. The risk assessment was independently created by ICLEI staff and can be found in the attachment City of Peterborough Community Climate Change Resiliency Strategy in appendix 4. | ||
| 545 | Cities 2021 | 54092 | City of Ann Arbor, MI | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | City of Ann Arbor Hazard Mitigation Plan | https://www.a2gov.org/departments/fire/emergency-management/SiteAssets/Pages/Hazard-Mitigation-Plan-/Ann_Arbor_Hazard_Mitigation_Plan_FINAL_20171205.pdf | 2017 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | N/A | Consultant | Yes | Commercial; Emergency Management; Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Industrial; Information & Communications Technology; Land use planning; Public health; Residential; Transport; Waste Management; Water Supply & Sanitation | The 2017 Hazard Mitigation Plan was approved by FEMA in November 2017. The plan provides a risk assessment of natural, technological, and human-related hazards that could impact the City of Ann Arbor. The completed 2017 plan enables the city to not only increase its resilience to reduce risks but also maintain its eligibility for state and federal hazard mitigation funding. The city's Technical Advisory Committee meets twice a year to update the mitigation strategy action items within the plan. Regular maintenance of the plan assures continuity across all city mitigation activities and supports the FEMA required 2022 updates. In 2021, the 2022 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update process will begin. | |
| 546 | Cities 2021 | 54096 | City of Saint John, NB | Canada | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |
| 547 | Cities 2021 | 54098 | City of Thunder Bay, ON | Canada | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Climate-Ready City: City of Thunder Bay Climate Adaptation Strategy | https://climatereadycity.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Earthcare_Climate_Ready_City_Web1.pdf | 2015 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | Dedicated city team | Yes | Community & Culture; Emergency Management; Energy; Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Food and agriculture; Land use planning; Law & Order; Public health; Residential; Tourism; Transport; Waste Management; Water Supply & Sanitation | Potential impacts were grouped based on the following: Extreme weather events, increase in temperature, and changes in precipitation patterns.Within the above attached document, the vulnerability and risk assessment results can be found in Appendix D. | ||
| 548 | Cities 2021 | 54100 | City of Columbia, MO | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Health Vulnerability Assessment | https://www.como.gov/sustainability/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2018/05/CoMoCAAP_VAfactsheets_Health_v2.pdf | 2018 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | It is for our Climate Action & Adaptation Plan. | Consultant | Yes | Community & Culture; Emergency Management; Energy; Food and agriculture; Land use planning; Public health; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | This report primarily focused on human health and how different sectors relate to that topic. | |
| 549 | Cities 2021 | 54100 | City of Columbia, MO | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 2 | Built Environment Vulnerability Assessment | https://www.como.gov/sustainability/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2018/05/CoMoCAAP_VAfactsheets_BuiltEnv_v1.pdf | 2018 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | It is for our Climate Action & Adaptation Plan. | Consultant | Yes | Energy; Land use planning; Residential; Transport; Water Supply & Sanitation | This report assesses the vulnerability related to housing, transportation, and stormwater management. | |
| 550 | Cities 2021 | 54100 | City of Columbia, MO | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 3 | Water Vulnerability Assessment | https://www.como.gov/sustainability/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2018/05/CoMoCAAP_VAfactsheets_Water_v1.pdf | 2018 | Same – covers entire city and nothing else | It is for our Climate Action & Adaptation Plan. | Consultant | Yes | Environment, Biodiversity and Forestry; Land use planning; Water Supply & Sanitation | The water-related vulnerabilities and its impact on the environment are discussed in this report. |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This dataset contains 2021 data on cities' climate risk and vulnerability assessments, as reported by cities through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System in response to question 2.0b (" Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment.") in the 2021 Cities questionnaire. View the Cities questionnaire at https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions about the data.
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
For further guidance on how to reference this data for use in external publications, please refer to the Open Data Portal Terms of Use available on the homepage.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 79
- Downloads
- 12
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Climate Hazards
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- climate hazards, risks, 2021, cities
- Row Label
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
