Go back to the interactive dataset

2016 – Water risks that could impact companies’ direct operations

Row numberAccount NumberCompany NameIncorporated CountryCDP ProgramReporting YearAccessIndustry Activity GroupGiCS SectorCountryRiver basinRisk driverPotential impactDescription of impactTimeframeLikelihoodMagnitude of potential financial impactResponse strategyCosts of response strategyDetails of strategy and costs
10019863LIXIL Group CorporationJapanWater2016PublicBuilding ProductsIndustrialsChinaOther: ??????Regulatory-Regulatory uncertaintyHigher operating costs1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with public policy makers
10029863LIXIL Group CorporationJapanWater2016PublicBuilding ProductsIndustrialsChinaOther: ??????Physical-Projected water scarcityHigher operating costs1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with public policy makers
10039863LIXIL Group CorporationJapanWater2016PublicBuilding ProductsIndustrialsChinaOther: ?????????Physical- Pollution of water sourceHigher operating costs1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure investment????????????????????????????3??????9600???????????
10049863LIXIL Group CorporationJapanWater2016PublicBuilding ProductsIndustrialsChinaOther: ?????????Physical-Declining water qualityHigher operating costs1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure investment????????????????????????????3??????9600???????????
10059872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanKisoPhysical-Climate changeReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10069872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanKisoPhysical-Declining water qualityReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10079872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanKisoPhysical-Increased water stressReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10089962Kajima CorporationJapanWater2016PublicConstruction & EngineeringIndustrialsJapanOther: ??????(????????)Physical-Climate changePlant/production disruption leading to reduced outputCurrent-up to 1 yearProbableMediumDevelop flood emergency plans; Other: ??????????????6,000??????????????????????????????????????????????6,000??????????????????????????????????????????
10099872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanKisoPhysical-Increased water scarcityReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10109872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanKisoRegulatory-Statutory water withdrawal limits/changes to water allocationReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10119872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanKisoPhysical-FloodingReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10129872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanKisoPhysical-Rationing of municipal water supplyReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10139872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanKisoPhysical-Seasonal supply variability/Inter annual variabilityReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10149872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanKisoRegulatory-Unclear and/or unstable regulations on water allocation and wastewater dischargeReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10159872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanTonePhysical-Climate changeReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10169962Kajima CorporationJapanWater2016PublicConstruction & EngineeringIndustrialsJapanOther: ??????(????????)Physical-FloodingPlant/production disruption leading to reduced outputCurrent-up to 1 yearProbableMediumDevelop flood emergency plans; Other: ??????????????6,000??????????????????????????????????????????????6,000??????????????????????????????????????????
10179975KAZ MineralsUnited KingdomWater2016PublicMining - Iron, Aluminum, Other MetalsMaterials
10189872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanTonePhysical-Declining water qualityReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10199872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanTonePhysical-Increased water stressReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10209872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanTonePhysical-Seasonal supply variability/Inter annual variabilityReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10219872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanToneRegulatory-Statutory water withdrawal limits/changes to water allocationReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10229872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanToneRegulatory-Regulation of discharge quality/volumes leading to higher compliance costsReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10239872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanToneRegulatory-Unclear and/or unstable regulations on water allocation and wastewater dischargeReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10249872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanTonePhysical-FloodingReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
102510666Lexmark International, Inc.USAWater2016PublicTechnology Hardware & EquipmentInformation TechnologyUnited States of AmericaMississippi RiverPhysical-DroughtPlant/production disruption leading to reduced outputWater is used in production at the facilityUnknownUnlikelyMedium-highPromote best practice and awareness; Supplier diversificationNo additional costLexmark has diversified to add additional suppliers
10269872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanTonePhysical-Increased water scarcityReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10279872JSR CorporationJapanWater2016PublicChemicalsMaterialsJapanTonePhysical-Rationing of municipal water supplyReduction in revenueIf both quantity and quality of water required for our production becomes not sufficiently ensured, the production might be strongly influenced, and in the worst case, the production might stop. Such case might reduce revenues, and might have big impact to our results.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumAlignment of public policy positions with water stewardship goals; Develop flood emergency plans; Engagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Infrastructure maintenanceIt is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.It is estimated that the equipment cost will increase in the order of 1,000 million yen or more for replacement of the equipment.
10289956KAO CorporationJapanWater2016PublicConsumer Durables, Household and Personal ProductsConsumer StaplesChinaYangtze River (Chang Jiang)Physical-Projected water stressConstraint to growthWater purchase and water quality management cost increase, and it restricts the growth of our business if the procurement of water becomes difficult, production capacity becomes limited, and water contamination would not improve.>6 yearsProbableHighOther: Promotion of the efficency of water utilizationLow-mediumUse of rainwater ,water conservation activities and development of water balance data for strategy
10299956KAO CorporationJapanWater2016PublicConsumer Durables, Household and Personal ProductsConsumer StaplesVietnamOther: Song Dong NaiPhysical-Projected water stressConstraint to growthThe procurement of water in a certain quality becomes difficult, which restricts the production capacity and limits the growth of our business.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumOther: Promotion of the efficency of water utilizationLow-mediumWater conservation activities and development of water balance data for strategy
10309956KAO CorporationJapanWater2016PublicConsumer Durables, Household and Personal ProductsConsumer StaplesPhilippinesOther: CabligPhysical-FloodingConstraint to growthDecrease in production capacity caused by flooding damages to facilities results in the loss of market opportunities.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumOther: Prevention of flooding to the inside of the facilities and the establishment of systems to quickly discharge flooded waterLow-mediumInstallation of water prevention walls and drainage canals
10319956KAO CorporationJapanWater2016PublicConsumer Durables, Household and Personal ProductsConsumer StaplesThailandOther: Bang PakongPhysical-FloodingConstraint to growthDecrease in production capacity caused by flooding damages to facilities and the stagnation of the supply chain due to long-term problems expected in wide areas will result in the loss of market opportunities.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumOther: Prevention of flooding to the inside of the facilities, the establishment of systems to quickly discharge flooded water and the establishment of supply chain BCP and the building systemsLow-mediumThe development of flood prevention and response facilities and the development of supply chain response systems
10329956KAO CorporationJapanWater2016PublicConsumer Durables, Household and Personal ProductsConsumer StaplesMalaysiaOther: Sungai JawiPhysical-Projected water stressConstraint to growthThe procurement of water in a certain quality becomes difficult, which restricts the production capacity and limits the growth of our business.>6 yearsProbableLow-mediumOther: Promotion of the efficency of water utilizationLow-mediumUse of rainwater ,water conservation activities and development of water balance data for strategy
10339956KAO CorporationJapanWater2016PublicConsumer Durables, Household and Personal ProductsConsumer StaplesIndonesiaOther: Saluran Irigasi KaliReputational-Inadequate access to water, sanitation and hygieneConstraint to growthThe procurement of water becomes difficult, which restricts the production capacity and limits the growth of our business. If economic growth in the future results in the increased amount of water use by people, the associated risks will increase.Current-up to 1 yearProbableMediumOther: Promotion of the efficency of water utilizationLow-mediumWater conservation activities and development of water balance data for strategy
10349956KAO CorporationJapanWater2016PublicConsumer Durables, Household and Personal ProductsConsumer StaplesJapanOther: KinikawaOther: Tightening of regulationsHigher operating costsThe performance level of a effluent treatment facility became higher than before so as to meet the standard of drainage water quality.4-6 yearsUnlikelyLowOther: Compliance to criteria of local law or internal criteria, whichever is more strict0.1 billion yenEnhancement of effluent treatment facility.Cost was estimated considering effluent quantity, water quality, and specification for those items. Additional cost will not apperer until reguration level would set much severer.
10359956KAO CorporationJapanWater2016PublicConsumer Durables, Household and Personal ProductsConsumer StaplesJapanOther: ToyokawaPhysical-Seasonal supply variability/Inter annual variabilityPlant/production disruption leading to reduced outputA risk of the restriction of production would generate in case that the rainfall in Toyokawa basin decrease and the water withdrawal is restricted.UnknownUnlikelyLowIncreased investment in new technologyLow-mediumThe development and introduction of water recycling system
103610056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesUnited States of AmericaMississippi RiverPhysical-Inadequate infrastructureHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Omaha, Nebraska plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the internal knowledge survey portion of our Water Risk Assessment has highlighted the fact that the local infrastructure is currently capacity constrained and has a history of flooding.1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Establish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Increased investment in new technology; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.During 2015, the Omaha GoGreen employee engagement team held several plant-wide meetings to increase employee awareness about onsite water use and to generate water saving ideas. The Omaha plant will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained or the local infrastructure constraint is not resolved at the Omaha plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks. Capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented projects and those currently under investigation.
103710056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesUnited States of AmericaMississippi RiverRegulatory-Higher water pricesHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Omaha, Nebraska plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the internal knowledge survey portion of our Water Risk Assessment has highlighted the fact that the local infrastructure is currently capacity constrained and has a history of flooding.1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Establish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Increased investment in new technology; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.During 2015, the Omaha GoGreen employee engagement team held several plant-wide meetings to increase employee awareness about onsite water use and to generate water saving ideas. The Omaha plant will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained or the local infrastructure constraint is not resolved at the Omaha plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks. Capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented projects and those currently under investigation.
103810056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesUnited States of AmericaMississippi RiverPhysical-FloodingHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Omaha, Nebraska plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the internal knowledge survey portion of our Water Risk Assessment has highlighted the fact that the local infrastructure is currently capacity constrained and has a history of flooding.1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Establish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Increased investment in new technology; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.During 2015, the Omaha GoGreen employee engagement team held several plant-wide meetings to increase employee awareness about onsite water use and to generate water saving ideas. The Omaha plant will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained or the local infrastructure constraint is not resolved at the Omaha plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks. Capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented projects and those currently under investigation.
103910056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesUnited States of AmericaMississippi RiverRegulatory-Regulatory uncertaintyHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Omaha, Nebraska plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the internal knowledge survey portion of our Water Risk Assessment has highlighted the fact that the local infrastructure is currently capacity constrained and has a history of flooding.1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Establish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Increased investment in new technology; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.During 2015, the Omaha GoGreen employee engagement team held several plant-wide meetings to increase employee awareness about onsite water use and to generate water saving ideas. The Omaha plant will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained or the local infrastructure constraint is not resolved at the Omaha plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks. Capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented projects and those currently under investigation.
104010056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesUnited States of AmericaMississippi RiverPhysical-Increased water scarcityHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Omaha, Nebraska plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the internal knowledge survey portion of our Water Risk Assessment has highlighted the fact that the local infrastructure is currently capacity constrained and has a history of flooding.1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Establish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Increased investment in new technology; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.During 2015, the Omaha GoGreen employee engagement team held several plant-wide meetings to increase employee awareness about onsite water use and to generate water saving ideas. The Omaha plant will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained or the local infrastructure constraint is not resolved at the Omaha plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks. Capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented projects and those currently under investigation.
104110148Kimberly-Clark CorporationUSAWater2016PublicConsumer Durables, Household and Personal ProductsConsumer StaplesBahrainOther: Groundwater/industrialPhysical-Projected water scarcityConstraint to growthLimited access to fresh water supplyCurrent-up to 1 yearHighly probableMediumEngagement with public policy makers; Engagement with other stakeholders in the river basin; Infrastructure investment; Increased capital expenditure; Increased investment in new technology; Promote best practice and awareness$500,000 estimateSubstantive change at this facility is limited future growth due to limited access to fresh water. Facility is using new technology (RO System) to use treated cooling water from a nearby power plant for their process water supply, at a cost of $500,000.
104210056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesUnited States of AmericaMississippi RiverPhysical-Increased water stressHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Omaha, Nebraska plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the internal knowledge survey portion of our Water Risk Assessment has highlighted the fact that the local infrastructure is currently capacity constrained and has a history of flooding.1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Establish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Increased investment in new technology; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.During 2015, the Omaha GoGreen employee engagement team held several plant-wide meetings to increase employee awareness about onsite water use and to generate water saving ideas. The Omaha plant will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained or the local infrastructure constraint is not resolved at the Omaha plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks. Capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented projects and those currently under investigation.
104310056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesUnited States of AmericaMississippi RiverRegulatory-Regulation of discharge quality/volumes leading to higher compliance costsHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Omaha, Nebraska plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the internal knowledge survey portion of our Water Risk Assessment has highlighted the fact that the local infrastructure is currently capacity constrained and has a history of flooding.1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Establish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Increased investment in new technology; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.During 2015, the Omaha GoGreen employee engagement team held several plant-wide meetings to increase employee awareness about onsite water use and to generate water saving ideas. The Omaha plant will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained or the local infrastructure constraint is not resolved at the Omaha plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks. Capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented projects and those currently under investigation.
104410056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesUnited States of AmericaMississippi RiverRegulatory-Unclear and/or unstable regulations on water allocation and wastewater dischargeHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Omaha, Nebraska plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the internal knowledge survey portion of our Water Risk Assessment has highlighted the fact that the local infrastructure is currently capacity constrained and has a history of flooding.1-3 yearsProbableLowEngagement with community; Engagement with public policy makers; Establish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Increased investment in new technology; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.During 2015, the Omaha GoGreen employee engagement team held several plant-wide meetings to increase employee awareness about onsite water use and to generate water saving ideas. The Omaha plant will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained or the local infrastructure constraint is not resolved at the Omaha plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks. Capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented projects and those currently under investigation.
104510056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesSpainEbroPhysical-Increased water scarcityHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Valls, Spain plant as a high risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained.1-3 yearsProbableLowEstablish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.The Valls plant is one of our most efficient users of water amongst our global manufacturing facilities and will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets have were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained at the Valls plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks.
104610056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesSpainEbroPhysical-Increased water stressHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Valls, Spain plant as a high risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained.1-3 yearsProbableLowEstablish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.The Valls plant is one of our most efficient users of water amongst our global manufacturing facilities and will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets have were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained at the Valls plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks.
104710056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesRussiaDonRegulatory-Higher water pricesHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Voronezh, Russia plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the Voronezh plant is currently experiencing increased costs associated with water withdrawal limits and strict wastewater quality limits. The cost of water and wastewater treatment is expected to continue to increase and growth in this location may be constrained.Current-up to 1 yearHighly probableLowEstablish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.. The Voronezh plant is one of our most efficient users of water amongst our global manufacturing facilities and will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets have were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained at the Voronezh plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks
104810056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesRussiaDonPhysical-Increased water scarcityHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Voronezh, Russia plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the Voronezh plant is currently experiencing increased costs associated with water withdrawal limits and strict wastewater quality limits. The cost of water and wastewater treatment is expected to continue to increase and growth in this location may be constrained.Current-up to 1 yearHighly probableLowEstablish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.. The Voronezh plant is one of our most efficient users of water amongst our global manufacturing facilities and will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets have were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained at the Voronezh plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks
104910056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesRussiaDonPhysical-Increased water stressHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Voronezh, Russia plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the Voronezh plant is currently experiencing increased costs associated with water withdrawal limits and strict wastewater quality limits. The cost of water and wastewater treatment is expected to continue to increase and growth in this location may be constrained.Current-up to 1 yearHighly probableLowEstablish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.. The Voronezh plant is one of our most efficient users of water amongst our global manufacturing facilities and will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets have were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained at the Voronezh plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks
105010056Kellogg CompanyUSAWater2016PublicFood & Beverage ProcessingConsumer StaplesRussiaDonRegulatory-Regulation of discharge quality/volumes leading to higher compliance costsHigher operating costsThe Kellogg Water Risk Assessment identified the Voronezh, Russia plant as a moderate risk for increased water scarcity and stress. As water stress increases, the cost of water will continue to increase. As water scarcity increases, growth in this location may be constrained. Additionally, the Voronezh plant is currently experiencing increased costs associated with water withdrawal limits and strict wastewater quality limits. The cost of water and wastewater treatment is expected to continue to increase and growth in this location may be constrained.Current-up to 1 yearHighly probableLowEstablish site-specific targets; Increased capital expenditure; Promote best practice and awarenessWater conservation efforts are expected to cost less than $500,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual operating budget. Increased capital investment is expected to cost less than $2,000,000 USD. This is a relatively low cost in the context of the Kellogg overall global annual capital budget.. The Voronezh plant is one of our most efficient users of water amongst our global manufacturing facilities and will continue to reduce water consumption through employee engagement, asset care programs, and capital projects within the next three years. Site-specific 2016 water use targets have were established for all global manufacturing facilities in 2015. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the short term risk to water stress. Water conservation and capital investment costs were estimated based on previously implemented conservation programs and projects and those currently under investigation. If growth is constrained at the Voronezh plant, Kellogg may need to invest capital in either product relocation or water reduction/reuse technologies at this facility. This response is not expected to be required within the next decade. This strategy is expected to be an effective response to the long term water scarcity risks

About

Profile Picture Simeran

created Sep 18 2017

updated Oct 4 2018

Description

CDP's water program motivates companies to disclose and reduce their environmental impacts by using the power of investors and customers. The data CDP collects help influential decision makers to reduce risk, capitalize on opportunities and drive action towards a more sustainable world. This dataset comes from question W3.2c asking companies to list the inherent water risks that could generate a substantive change in their business, operations, revenue or expenditure, the potential impact to their direct operations and the strategies to mitigate them.

Activity
Community Rating
Current value: 0 out of 5
Raters
0
Visits
376
Downloads
112
Comments
0
Contributors
0
Meta
Category
Companies
Permissions
Public
Tags
water, 2016
Row Label
SODA2 Only
Yes
Licensing and Attribution
Data Provided By
(none)
Source Link
(none)
License Type
License Type
CDP Open Database License

Filter

  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;

Sort

  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;

Search

Post a Comment

Comments

  • Total Comments: 0
  • Average Rating: 0.0

Sharing

This dataset is public

Publishing

See Preview