Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 117551 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53959 | City of Fayetteville, AR | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 7 | Please explain any excluded sources, identify any emissions covered under an ETS and provide any other comments | 27 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > CHP generation | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117552 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54124 | City of Fremont | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 2 | Action title | 7 | Public Transit Improvements | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117553 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54113 | City of Flagstaff | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 8 | Who owns the data? | 6 | O3 (Daily maximum 8 hour mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117554 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43907 | City of Indianapolis | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 5 | Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117555 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59572 | District of Saanich, BC | Canada | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 1 | Most recent years available (select year) | 5 | NO2 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117556 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54100 | City of Columbia, MO | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 3 | Target year of goal | 1 | 2050 | There are multiple goals (and key performance indicators) for our adaptation goals. I've included 1 of the goals and one of the KPIs examples because we only have the values and targets for the one KPI. We're developing the values and targets for the other KPIs. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117557 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74463 | Village of Park Forest, IL | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.0a | Please detail which goals and targets are incorporated in your city’s master plan and describe how these goals are addressed in the table below. | 1 | Goal type | 7 | Other, please specify: Land management targets | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117558 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 10 | Scope and impact of action | 22 | The Waste Reduction Community Investment Program pilot is modelled on the former Live Green Community Investment Program whose objective was to initiate actions and build capacity with local communities and neighbourhoods.The purpose of the Waste Reduction Community Investment Program is to identify, develop and initiate community-led actions that reduce residential waste and increase participation in the City of Toronto's waste diversion programs. The priority is on investing in actions that address multi-residential buildings, multi-lingual communities, and Neighbourhood Improvement Areas. Examples of projects include community composting, waste education and engagement, and projects that support products / goods repair, sharing, exchanges or swaps to reduce waste. The Waste Reduction Community Investment Program will operate as a pilot project from 2018 to 2021 and will fund community-led projects in 2018, 2019 and 2020, totalling $745,798, which includes a maximum of $150,000 of grant funding per year. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117559 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54082 | City of Hollywood, FL | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.0a | Please provide details of your renewable energy or electricity target(s) and how the city plans to meet those targets. | 2 | Type | 1 | Energy | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 117560 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43914 | City of Charlotte | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 11 | Awareness raising program or campaign | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117561 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 55419 | City of Miramar | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 2 | Where data is not available, please explain why | 6 | Transportation – Scope 2 (II.X.2) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117562 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50540 | City of Albuquerque | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.6 | How many buses has your city procured in the last year? | 2 | Comment | 3 | Electric trolley buses | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117563 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54104 | City of Boulder | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 2 | Category | 22 | Direct emissions | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117564 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59572 | District of Saanich, BC | Canada | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.7a | Please complete the table reporting your local government Scope 3 emissions. | 1 | Source of Scope 3 emissions | 1 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117565 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 834083 | City of Eau Claire, WI | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.5 | Please attach your city-wide inventory in Excel or other spreadsheet format and provide additional details on the inventory calculation methods in the table below. | 5 | Please select which additional sectors are included in the inventory | 2 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 117566 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49342 | City of Rochester | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Climate Action Planning | 6.14 | How do the city's environment/sustainability and economic development departments work together, for instance, in planning climate actions? | 4 | Joint target setting and/or monitoring (e.g. environmental targets impacting business) | 1 | Working togehter | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117567 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54037 | City of Des Moines | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.9 | How many public access EV charging points do you have in your city and/or metropolitan area for the following types. | 1 | Number of charging points | 4 | All types | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117568 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59545 | City of Charlottesville, VA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 5 | Stationary energy > Agriculture | Not Occurring | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117569 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63862 | City of Ashland, OR | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Planning | 5.5a | Please attach your city’s climate change mitigation plan below. If your city has both mitigation and energy access plans, please make sure to attach all relevant documents below. | 5 | Areas covered by action plan | 1 | Waste | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117570 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49335 | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.6 | Has your city tested their climate actions through pilot/demonstration projects? | 2 | Description of project and weblink | 1 | Tested by city government | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117571 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58513 | City of Medford | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 3 | Average concentration for second most recent year available (ug/m3) | 4 | PM10 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117572 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63862 | City of Ashland, OR | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply Management | 14.3 | Please select the actions you are taking to reduce the risks to your city’s water security. | 4 | Action description and implementation progress | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117573 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31182 | City of San Francisco | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6f | Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your city-wide emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by end user (buildings, water, waste, transport), economic sector (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional), or any other classification system used in your city. | 3 | Scope | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117574 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 61790 | City of Emeryville, CA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 19 | Name of the engagement activities | 2 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117575 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 55419 | City of Miramar | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide external verification | 4.12b | Please explain why your city-wide emissions inventory is not verified and describe any plans to verify your city-wide emissions in the future. | 1 | Reason | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117576 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43914 | City of Charlotte | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6c | Please provide a breakdown of your GHG emissions by scope. Where values are not available, please use the comment field to indicate the reason why. | 8 | Total Scope 2 emissions | 1 | City-wide emissions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117577 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31108 | City of Houston | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply | 14.2a | Please identify the risks to your city’s water security as well as the timescale and level of risk. | 3 | Estimated magnitude of potential impact | 1 | Extremely serious | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117578 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59633 | City of Santa Cruz, CA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 8 | Future change in frequency | 6 | Increasing | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117579 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54104 | City of Boulder | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Collaboration | 6.3 | Describe how your local/regional government collaborates and coordinates horizontally on climate action. | 1 | Entity with which your local/regional government collaborates and coordinates horizontally on climate action | 1 | Horizontal collaboration and coordination | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117580 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49327 | City of Providence | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.8 | Please indicate if your city-wide emissions have increased, decreased, or stayed the same since your last emissions inventory, and describe why. | 3 | Please explain and quantify changes in emissions | 1 | Please explain | Citywide Emissions declined by 3.04% over the three-year span from 2,574,360 tonnes of CO2e in 2015, to 2,496,185 tonnes in 2018, equating to an approximate average of 1.01% reduction per year.Residential energy use, solid waste, and process and fugitive emissions remained relatively flat between 2015 and 2018. Commercial energy use increased, while both industrial and transportation energy went down. The increase in commercial energy use is largely attributed to an increase in electricity use from the Commercial and Industrial sector. Industrial has declined due to the reduction of emissions from Manchester Street Power Station. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117581 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50565 | City of Toledo | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.1 | Does your city have emissions reduction targets or energy efficiency targets for the following building types? | 4 | Please provide more details and/or link to more information about the energy efficiency target. | 3 | Residential | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117582 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 10894 | City of Los Angeles | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply Management | 14.3 | Please select the actions you are taking to reduce the risks to your city’s water security. | 3 | Status of action | 10 | Implementation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117583 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35883 | City of San José | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.2 | What percentage of the solid waste generated in your city is diverted away from landfill or incineration? | 0 | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||||
| 117584 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 14874 | City of Portland, OR | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 27 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > CHP generation | Integrated Elsewhere | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117585 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54119 | City of Palo Alto | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 10 | Scope and impact of action | 1 | Launched a new Energy Reach Code demonstrating leadership in the energy efficiency space for new construction. Implement the City's sustainability goals by codifying the Green Building Summit's recommendations into 2019 Building Code cycle update and continue to support the Office of Sustainability with the Sustainability Implementation Plan. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117586 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58513 | City of Medford | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 6 | Land use planning | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117587 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50544 | City of Aurora, IL | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0c | Please explain why your city does not have a climate risk and vulnerability assessment. | 2 | Comment | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117588 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59631 | City of San Leandro, CA | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.5 | List any mitigation, adaptation, water related or resilience projects you have planned within your city for which you hope to attract financing and provide details on the estimated costs and status of the project. If your city does not have any relevant projects, please select 'No relevant projects' under 'Project Area'. | 6 | Identified financing model description | 4 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 117589 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35853 | City of Baltimore | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 13 | Total cost provided by the majority funding source (currency) | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 117590 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54111 | City of Iowa City | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.3a | Please report on how climate change impacts health outcomes and health services in your city. | 3 | Identify the climate hazards most significantly impacting the selected areas | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117591 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54078 | City of Hayward | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 2 | Action title | 1 | EBCE Brilliant 100 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117592 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50558 | City of London, ON | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 2 | Enhanced resilience | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117593 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43912 | City of Edmonton | Canada | North America | Energy | 8.5b | Please explain why you do not have an energy efficiency target and any plans to introduce one in the future. | 1 | Reason | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117594 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50559 | City of St Catharines, ON | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 9 | Activity level (per emission factor unit denominator) | 11 | 0.002 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117595 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59669 | City of North Vancouver | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 26 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > Electricity-only generation | Not Occurring | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 117596 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54100 | City of Columbia, MO | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 2 | Web link | 2 | https://www.como.gov/sustainability/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2018/05/CoMoCAAP_VAfactsheets_BuiltEnv_v1.pdf | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117597 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74546 | City of Milwaukie, OR | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply | 14.2a | Please identify the risks to your city’s water security as well as the timescale and level of risk. | 1 | Water security risk drivers | 2 | Drought | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117598 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 55801 | City of West Palm Beach | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 7 | Persons living in sub-standard housing | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 117599 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54119 | City of Palo Alto | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.5 | Does your city have a target to increase energy efficiency? | 0 | 0 | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||||
| 117600 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848567 | Mid-America Regional Council | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 5 | Social impact of hazard overall | 2 | Increased demand for public services | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
