Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120801 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50572 | City of Saint Paul, MN | United States of America | North America | Food | 12.1 | What is the per capita meat and dairy consumption (kg/yr) in your city? | 1 | Amount | 1 | Meat consumption per capita (kg/year) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 120802 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73666 | Cuyahoga County | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.0 | What is the annual solid waste generation in your city? | 3 | Please describe the methodology used to calculate the annual solid waste generation in your city | 1 | Please complete | This information was obtained from the Ohio EPA's website using data provided by the Cuyahoga County Solid Waste District. This data is Waste generation (Disposal+recycling). | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120803 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54098 | City of Thunder Bay | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 2 | Category | 8 | Emissions occurring outside the city boundary as a result of in-city activities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120804 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54124 | City of Fremont | United States of America | North America | Introduction | City Details | 0.5 | Please provide details of your city’s current population. Report the population in the year of your reported inventory, if possible. | 3 | Projected population | 1 | Please complete | 256200 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 120805 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54037 | City of Des Moines | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 2 | Where data is not available, please explain why | 6 | Transportation – Scope 2 (II.X.2) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 120806 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59572 | District of Saanich, BC | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 2 | Climate hazards that adaptation goal addresses | 12 | Wild fire > Forest fire | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120807 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54111 | City of Iowa City | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.5 | Please describe to what extent the planning process is transparent and open. | 2 | The climate adaptation/mitigation plan makes the criteria and process for prioritizing climate actions explicit | 1 | Planning process | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 120808 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 1 | Climate hazards | 3 | Extreme hot temperature > Extreme hot days | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120809 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49333 | City of Louisville, KY | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 2 | Climate hazards that adaptation goal addresses | 7 | Extreme hot temperature > Heat wave | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120810 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35877 | City of Pittsburgh | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Climate Action Planning | 6.15 | How many people within your city are employed in green jobs/industries? | 4 | Comment | 1 | Green jobs/industries | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 120811 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 4 | Status of action | 1 | Implementation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120812 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43912 | City of Edmonton | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 7 | Please explain any excluded sources, identify any emissions covered under an ETS and provide any other comments | 27 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > CHP generation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120813 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54070 | City of Eugene | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 13 | Description of the stakeholder engagement processes | 1 | The City of Eugene conducted an award winning outreach program to ensure participation from the public, businesses, and government entities around the city. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120814 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50568 | City of Saskatoon | Canada | North America | Food | 12.6 | What percentage of your population is food insecure? | 2 | Comment | 1 | Population that is food insecure | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120815 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59707 | Town of Princeton, NJ | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 13 | Total Transport | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 120816 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54088 | City of Peterborough | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 11 | Does this target align with the global 1.5 - 2 °C pathway set out in the Paris Agreement? | 1 | No | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120817 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49342 | City of Rochester | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6c | Please provide a breakdown of your GHG emissions by scope. Where values are not available, please use the comment field to indicate the reason why. | 2 | Level of confidence | 1 | City-wide emissions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 120818 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50568 | City of Saskatoon | Canada | North America | Food | 12.0a | Report the tonnes per food group that are served and/or sold through programs managed by your city (this includes schools, canteens, hospitals etc.). | 1 | Tonnes served and/or sold | 6 | Protein sources | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120819 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54037 | City of Des Moines | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.2 | What scale is the electricity mix data reported above? | 0 | 0 | We do not have access to electricity data: Since electricity is supplied through MidAmerican Energy, we do not have direct access to the breakdown of sources of energy provided to the City of Des Moines. We will be working closely with the utility to identify these sources in the near term. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||||
| 120820 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50549 | City of Fort Worth | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 3 | Emergency services | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120821 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54070 | City of Eugene | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 2 | Energy | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120822 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59124 | City of Natchez, MS | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 2 | Climate hazards that adaptation goal addresses | 0 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 120823 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31182 | City of San Francisco | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 11 | Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water) | Exact project funding/costs data is unavailable at this time. A few of the listed emission reduction programs/activities do not have estimated emissions reduction targets, due to the fact that they have not been calculated before for the specific action only and are a part of a larger action strategy with estimated emissions reduction, but ratio emissions reduction targets are unknown. However, all programs listed below are expected to yield emission reductions, regardless of the project timescale. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 120824 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50558 | City of London, ON | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 4 | Current magnitude of hazard | 3 | Medium High | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120825 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59535 | Town of Vail, CO | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning Process | 3.5 | Please explain how your city has addressed vulnerable groups through transformative action. | 0 | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 120826 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54092 | City of Ann Arbor | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 10 | Future expected magnitude of hazard | 9 | High | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120827 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31108 | City of Houston | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 1 | Climate hazards | 2 | Storm and wind > Cyclone (Hurricane / Typhoon) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120828 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54085 | City of Savannah | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.5 | Please give the total amount of fuel (refers to Scope 1 emissions) that your local government has consumed this year. | 4 | Units | 4 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120829 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31181 | City of Philadelphia | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 1 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 6 | Transportation – Scope 2 (II.X.2) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 120830 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50551 | City of Long Beach | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Emissions Verification | 7.9b | Please explain why your local government operations inventory is not verified and describe any future plans for verification. | 2 | Explanation | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 120831 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 32550 | City of Denver | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 5 | Does this goal align with a requirement from a higher level of government? | 9 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 120832 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73666 | Cuyahoga County | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.0 | What is the annual solid waste generation in your city? | 1 | Amount of waste generated (tonnes/year) | 1 | Please complete | 2999989 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120833 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59642 | City of Dublin, CA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 20 | Aim of the engagement activities | 6 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120834 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 3417 | New York City | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 19 | Name of the engagement activities | 24 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 120835 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50558 | City of London, ON | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Publication title and attach the document | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120836 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31108 | City of Houston | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.5 | Provide information on GHG emissions from the transport sector. | 2 | Inventory year (numerical year) | 6 | Freight transport | 2019 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120837 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59572 | District of Saanich, BC | Canada | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 8 | Who owns the data? | 4 | PM10 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120838 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43910 | City of Columbus | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6f | Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your city-wide emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by end user (buildings, water, waste, transport), economic sector (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional), or any other classification system used in your city. | 1 | Source | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120839 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35883 | City of San José | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 6 | Primary author of assessment | 3 | Regional / state / provincial government | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120840 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49335 | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 9 | Please explain | 4 | Mayor Cooper re-promulgated this plan for necessary FEMA eligibility criteria on May 8, 2020, and in doing so made a direct link between hazards identified in the Hazard Mitigation Plan and rising global temperatures due to climate change: https://www.nashville.gov/Portals/0/SiteContent/OEM/docs/MultiHazardMitigation/cooper%20promulgation%20adoption%2005_08_20.pdfThis Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies goals and measures for hazard mitigation and risk reduction in order to make communities less vulnerable and more disaster resistant and sustainable. Information in the plan is used to help guide and coordinate mitigationactivities and local policy decisions for future land use decisions. The Plan follows DMA planning requirements and associated guidance for developing Local Hazard Mitigation Plans. This guidance sets forth a generalized four-task process:1) Organize Resources;2) Assess Hazards and Risks;3) Develop a Mitigation Plan; and4) Evaluate the Plan Effectiveness.This Plan also uses the guidelines from FEMA’s Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide, published October 2011. Although not required under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson, along with the Community Planning Team recognizes the need to integrate human-caused hazards into the natural hazard mitigation planning process. Althoughnot inclusive of all potential hazards, the most likely hazards in both categories are addressed here in order to necessitate a more effective mitigation planning process and strategy. The risk assessment for Metropolitan Nashville-Davidson County followed methodology from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Emergency Management Accreditation Program. This assessment process was conducted by the Nashville-Davidson County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Community Planning Team, and select subject matter experts. Risk from natural and man-made hazards is measured by a combination of impact, vulnerability and likelihood scores (Impact + Vulnerability x Likelihood = Risk). The impact and vulnerability scores were given the below parameters resulting from a hazard event:• Geographic Extent• Duration of the Event• Environment• Health Effects• Displacement and Suffering• Economy• Infrastructure• Transportation• Critical Services• Confidence in Government• Cascading EffectsThe Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment, published April 2019, can be found here: https://www.nashville.gov/Portals/0/SiteContent/OEM/docs/MultiHazardMitigation/public%20full%20thira%202019.pdfThe top identified climate-related risks for this area are Flooding, Tornadoes, Winter Storms, Extreme Temperature - Heat, Extreme Temperature - Cold, and Thunderstorms. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120841 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 55801 | City of West Palm Beach | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 8 | Emission factor unit (denominator) | 52 | MMBtu | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120842 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49333 | City of Louisville, KY | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 13 | Total cost provided by the local government | 2 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 120843 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 834083 | City of Eau Claire, WI | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.5 | Please attach your city-wide inventory in Excel or other spreadsheet format and provide additional details on the inventory calculation methods in the table below. | 3 | Emissions factors used | 2 | IPCC | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120844 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50558 | City of London, ON | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 2 | Category | 1 | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120845 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53829 | City of Kingston, ON | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning Process | 3.4 | Does your local/regional government apply a Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system for monitoring the implementation of adaptation goals and targets as part of the climate adaptation plan (or integrated climate action plan)? | 2 | Description of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system applied | 1 | Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) system | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 120846 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58627 | City of Alton, IL | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.5 | Please give the total amount of fuel (refers to Scope 1 emissions) that your local government has consumed this year. | 1 | Source | 2 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120847 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53829 | City of Kingston, ON | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 6 | Select the initiatives related to this adaptation goal that your city has committed to | 0 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 120848 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43912 | City of Edmonton | Canada | North America | Water Security | Water Supply Management | 14.3 | Please select the actions you are taking to reduce the risks to your city’s water security. | 4 | Action description and implementation progress | 5 | EPCORs is developing a River Flood Resiliency Plan to minimize the damage to both water treatment plants during large flood event in the North Saskatchewan River. The Government of Canada and the Province of Alberta have announced grant funding (March 2019) to support these flood mitigation upgrades of $11 million. The river flood protection plan at these plants is estimated to cost around $37 million. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120849 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59644 | City of Culver City, CA | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 3 | Action title | 10 | Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 120850 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50578 | City of Windsor | Canada | North America | Transport | 10.5 | Provide information on GHG emissions from the transport sector. | 1 | GHG emissions (CO2e) | 5 | Passenger Transport: Taxi/TNC | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
