Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 123301 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74575 | Dane County | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.5 | List any mitigation, adaptation, water related or resilience projects you have planned within your city for which you hope to attract financing and provide details on the estimated costs and status of the project. If your city does not have any relevant projects, please select 'No relevant projects' under 'Project Area'. | 3 | Stage of project development | 1 | Scoping | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123302 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35853 | City of Baltimore | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 13 | Total cost provided by the local government | 8 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 123303 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43908 | City of Milwaukee | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 19 | Name of the engagement activities | 1 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123304 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848565 | Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | Historical emissions inventories | 4.13 | Please provide details on any historical and base year city-wide emissions inventories your city has, in order to allow assessment of targets in the table below. | 4 | Previous emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 2 | 139830000 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123305 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50541 | City of Greensboro | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.4 | How much (in MW capacity) renewable energy is installed within the city boundary in the following categories? | 2 | Comment | 3 | Solar thermal | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 123306 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50578 | City of Windsor | Canada | North America | Buildings | 9.2 | Is your city implementing a strategy/pathway/roadmap to ensure that all new buildings are net zero carbon operational by 2030? | 3 | Please provide more detail and/or link to more information about the requirements | 1 | Please complete | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123307 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49327 | City of Providence | United States of America | North America | Food | 12.1 | What is the per capita meat and dairy consumption (kg/yr) in your city? | 2 | Year data applies to | 2 | Dairy consumption per capita (kg/year) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 123308 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63862 | City of Ashland, OR | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.4 | Please list the stakeholder engagement activities for each relevant stakeholder group. | 1 | Name of the stakeholder group | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123309 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54048 | City of Knoxville | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 16 | Target meets initial GCoM validation criteria | 1 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123310 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.6 | How many buses has your city procured in the last year? | 1 | Number of buses | 8 | CNG | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123311 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54116 | City of Dubuque | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 6 | Energy savings (MWh) | 6 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 123312 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74401 | City of Encinitas, CA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 11 | Does this target align with the global 1.5 - 2 °C pathway set out in the Paris agreement? | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123313 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.9 | Has your city taken steps to decarbonize the investments held by the city retirement funds and/or municipal investments, e.g. by making a commitment to divest from fossil fuels and/or increase sustainable investments? | 1 | Response | 1 | Municipal investments, e.g. by divesting from fossil fuels | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 123314 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74558 | Summit County, UT | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 3 | Stationary energy > Institutional buildings & facilities | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 123315 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74463 | Village of Park Forest, IL | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.6 | Please provide total (Scope 1 + Scope 2) GHG emissions for your local government operations, in metric tonnes CO2e. | 1 | Total Scope 1 + Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 1 | Local government emissions breakdown | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 123316 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59537 | City of Denton, TX | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.5 | Provide information on GHG emissions from the transport sector. | 2 | Inventory year (numerical year) | 5 | Passenger Transport: Taxi/TNC | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123317 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 13067 | City of New Orleans | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.6 | How many city staff (FTE) work on topics related to climate change mitigation and adaptation? | 3 | Comment | 1 | Please complete | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123318 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 4 | Implementation status | 36 | Monitoring and reporting | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123319 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73669 | San Luis Obispo | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 8 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 123320 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.3a | Please report on how climate change impacts health outcomes and health services in your city. | 5 | Timescale of climate-related issues for the selected health area | 2 | Current | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123321 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.3 | Please give the name of the primary protocol, standard, or methodology you have used to calculate your city’s city-wide GHG emissions. | 2 | Comment | 1 | Emissions methodology | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123322 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59535 | Town of Vail, CO | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 12 | Select the initiatives that this target contributes towards | 2 | Other, please specify: Climate Action Plan for Eagle County, Colorado Communities for Climate Action, Town of Vail Environmental Sustainability Strategic Plan | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123323 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63941 | Broward County, FL | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0b | Please provide details of your total fixed level target(s). | 8 | Percentage of target achieved | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123324 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 14874 | City of Portland, OR | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 6 | Energy savings (MWh) | 3 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 123325 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59707 | Town of Princeton, NJ | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 8 | Areas/sectors covered by the risk and vulnerability assessment | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123326 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74466 | Village of South Barrington, IL | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.2 | What is the mode share of each transport mode in your city for freight transport? | 1 | Mode share | 6 | In-land waterways | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123327 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74463 | Village of Park Forest, IL | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 10 | Future expected magnitude of hazard | 1 | High | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123328 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59538 | City of Mississauga | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 11 | Elderly | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123329 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 32550 | City of Denver | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 1 | Stationary energy > Residential buildings | 935172 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 123330 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35862 | City of Detroit | United States of America | North America | Food | 12.4 | How does your city increase access to sustainable foods? | 1 | Action implemented | 1 | Do you subsidise fresh fruits and vegetables? | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 123331 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59653 | City of Manhattan Beach, CA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 11 | Does this target align with the global 1.5 - 2 °C pathway set out in the Paris agreement? | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123332 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35874 | City of Phoenix | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.12 | Does your city have its own credit rating? | 2 | Rating agency | 2 | Domestic | Moody's | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 123333 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73706 | City of Alameda | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 5 | Number of monitoring stations | 4 | PM10 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123334 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31108 | City of Houston | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 2 | Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123335 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74594 | City of Boynton Beach | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.7 | Do you measure local government Scope 3 emissions? | 0 | 0 | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 123336 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 55801 | City of West Palm Beach | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 6 | Emission factor value | 16 | 10.21 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123337 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58621 | Town of Blacksburg | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 1 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 14 | TOTAL Scope 2 emissions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 123338 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74558 | Summit County, UT | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.6 | Does your city have any of the following initiatives, policies and/or regulations. | 1 | Response | 1 | Bans or restrictions on single use or non-recyclable materials | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123339 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50545 | City of Henderson | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 12 | Please describe the impacts experienced so far, and how you expect the hazard to impact in the future | 2 | In Clark County, there are 417.1 square miles in the Special Flood Hazard Areas. While floods can, and have occurred in almost every month of the year, the most damaging storms typically occur between July and September. Recent major events include:- Aug. 25, 2013 flash flooding on the Las Vegas Paiute Golf Resort caused millions of dollars in damage to three golf courses, only 18 of the 54 holes were spared from damage.- Sept. 9, 2014: Nearly five inches of rain over a two hour period resulted in two washes and a river overflowing. 139 homes were damaged and a large portion of I-15 was washed away and impaired accessibility to the Moapa River Indian Reservation. A major disaster declaration was proclaimed for the State of Nevada.- July 6, 2015: A thunderstorm brought heavy rain, hail and strong winds across the valley. One area of the valley received nearly an inch of rainfall within just 15 minutes, and 1 to 1.5 feet of rain was reported in the west valley. Firefighters performed 10 swift-water rescues and tended to stranded motorists. Approximately 800 Southern Nevada customers lost power.- April 9, 2016: Flash flood warnings were issued when 0.81 inch of rain was recorded at McCarran International Airport. The Nevada Highway Patrol responded to 127 crashes, mostly caused by hydroplaning. A total of 43 injuries and 77 cases of property damage were reported. In addition, the Clark County Fire Department also rescued seven people caught in the flooding.- August 4, 2017: Heavy flooding was trigged by afternoon thunderstorms that dropped a total of 0.47 inches of rain on the central valley over a six-hour period. Mount Charleston was hit the hardest, receiving 2.80 inches of rain in total that caused heavy flooding and debris to clutter roads. Along the Las Vegas Strip area, eight people were swept away by floodwaters in two areas. Seven of the eight people were rescued and one body was later recovered. The desert southwest often experiences intense rainfall and subsequent flash floods. Floods can and have occurred in almost every month of the year, however, the most damaging storms typically occur between July and September, which has been designated as flash flood season. According to the Clark County Emergency Management Plan – Basic Plan, a severe flash flood will occur in the Las Vegas Metropolitan Statistical Area every 2 – 12 months. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123340 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 55801 | City of West Palm Beach | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 16 | Web link to action website | 4 | https://www.wpb.org/government/engineering/mobility-and-transportation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123341 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49339 | City and County of Honolulu | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 2 | Action | 36 | Resilience and resistance measures for buildings | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123342 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59562 | City of Urbana, IL | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 7 | Percentage reduction target | 3 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 123343 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73295 | City of La Crosse, WI | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 7 | Please explain any excluded sources, identify any emissions covered under an ETS and provide any other comments | 10 | Transportation > Waterborne navigation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123344 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54034 | City of Grand Rapids | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply | 14.2a | Please identify the risks to your city’s water security as well as the timescale and level of risk. | 1 | Water security risk drivers | 2 | Inadequate or ageing water supply infrastructure | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123345 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43912 | City of Edmonton | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 18 | Total Waste | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123346 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43910 | City of Columbus | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 1 | Applicable sub-sector | 28 | CRF - Transportation > On-road | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123347 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54098 | City of Thunder Bay | Canada | North America | Food | 12.0a | Report the tonnes per food group that are served and/or sold through programs managed by your city (this includes schools, canteens, hospitals etc.). | 1 | Tonnes served and/or sold | 8 | Foods with added sugar | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 123348 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 3417 | New York City | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning Process | 3.5 | Please explain how your city has addressed vulnerable groups through transformative action. | 0 | 0 | NYC addresses the needs of vulnerable groups by prioritizing investments in vulnerable communities and identifying and implementing co-benefits of resilience and adaptation investments. For example, NYC developed a heat vulnerability index (HVI) that accounts for both the social and physical indicators of heat risk. The HVI guides NYC’s investments in heat resiliency. Heat resiliency solutions such as street tree plantings and installation of cool roofs have multiple benefits such as increased vegetation and beautification and reduced energy bills, respectively. Similarly, NYC’s coastal protection projects prioritize socially and physically vulnerable areas. For example, the East Side Coastal Resiliency project, which will break ground this year, will protect 110,000 people including 28,000 public housing residents. The project, largely as a result of feedback from the community, will not only protect 2.4 miles of coastline from the impacts of storm surge and sea-level rise but will also provide improved recreational areas and enhanced waterfront access | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 123349 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54034 | City of Grand Rapids | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply | 14.2a | Please identify the risks to your city’s water security as well as the timescale and level of risk. | 3 | Estimated magnitude of potential impact | 2 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 123350 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54048 | City of Knoxville | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide external verification | 4.12b | Please explain why your city-wide emissions inventory is not verified and describe any plans to verify your city-wide emissions in the future. | 2 | Comments | 1 | Please explain | Currently, funding is not available for an external audit of our GHG emissions data. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
