Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 125801 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43911 | City of Ottawa | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 1 | Mitigation action | 0 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 125802 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50555 | City of Hamilton | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 11 | Total cost of the project (currency) | 5 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 125803 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54100 | City of Columbia, MO | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | Historical emissions inventories | 4.13 | Please provide details on any historical and base year city-wide emissions inventories your city has, in order to allow assessment of targets in the table below. | 5 | Is this inventory used as the base year inventory? | 3 | No | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125804 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59550 | City of Bend, OR | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 15 | Total cost provided by the majority funding source (currency) | 8 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 125805 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59653 | City of Manhattan Beach, CA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 15 | Target meets initial GCoM validation criteria | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 125806 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50544 | City of Aurora, IL | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.7a | Please provide more details about the zero emissions zone. | 1 | Size (sq. km) | 1 | Please complete | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125807 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 14344 | City of Park City, UT | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 27 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > CHP generation | Not Occurring | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 125808 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43912 | City of Edmonton | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 3 | Current probability of hazard | 7 | Medium High | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125809 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54110 | City of Santa Monica | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 9 | Please explain | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 125810 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58483 | City of Surrey | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 7 | If the city boundary is different from the plan boundary, please explain why | 3 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 125811 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35862 | City of Detroit | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Emissions Verification | 7.9a | Please provide the following information about the emissions verification process. | 1 | Name of verifier and attach verification certificate | 1 | Verification details | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 125812 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50543 | Halifax Regional Municipality | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 3 | Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy) | Most GHG estimates are coming from the defined actions in our HalifACT 2050 Plan, and represent full implementation of the actions from now until 2050. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 125813 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74423 | City of Key West, FL | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 5 | Emissions occurring outside the city boundary as a result of in-city activities (metric tonnes CO2e) | 6 | Stationary energy > Fugitive emissions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 125814 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35475 | City of Calgary | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 8 | Future change in frequency | 5 | Increasing | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125815 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 60656 | City of Piedmont, CA | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.0a | Please detail which goals and targets are incorporated in your city’s master plan and describe how these goals are addressed in the table below. | 2 | How are these goals/targets addressed in the city master plan? | 1 | Piedmont is one of 14 cities that contributes to Alameda County's Stormwater Quality Management Plan. The Plan established new standards called TMDLs (Total Maximum Daily Load) which limit the total quantity of a pollutant that may be discharged to a water body during a specified time period. The Plan also includes a watershed management program that focuses on cooperative solutions amongcities. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125816 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43907 | City of Indianapolis | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.1 | Does your city have emissions reduction targets or energy efficiency targets for the following building types? | 2 | Please provide more details and/or link to more information about the emission reduction target. | 5 | All building types | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125817 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31090 | District of Columbia | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 21 | Attach reference document | 11 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125818 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50572 | City of Saint Paul, MN | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Planning | 5.5a | Please attach your city’s climate change mitigation plan below. If your city has both mitigation and energy access plans, please make sure to attach all relevant documents below. | 5 | Areas covered by action plan | 1 | Agriculture and Forestry | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125819 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35475 | City of Calgary | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 5 | Means of implementation | 5 | Assessment and evaluation activities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125820 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54060 | City of Greater Sudbury / Grand Sudbury | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 10 | Future expected magnitude of hazard | 2 | Medium | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125821 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54048 | City of Knoxville | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 13 | Enhanced climate change adaptation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125822 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59631 | City of San Leandro, CA | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.5 | Does your city have a target to increase energy efficiency? | 0 | 0 | In progress | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||||
| 125823 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 10894 | City of Los Angeles | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 5 | Emissions occurring outside the city boundary as a result of in-city activities (metric tonnes CO2e) | 20 | IPPU > Product use | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125824 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43912 | City of Edmonton | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 2 | Where data is not available, please explain why | 11 | Industrial Processes and Product Use – Scope 1 (IV) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 125825 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49342 | City of Rochester | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 6 | Energy savings (MWh) | 2 | 0 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125826 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50543 | Halifax Regional Municipality | Canada | North America | Buildings | 9.1 | Does your city have emissions reduction targets or energy efficiency targets for the following building types? | 3 | Energy efficiency target | 3 | Residential | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125827 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49327 | City of Providence | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.0a | Please provide details of your renewable energy or electricity target(s) and how the city plans to meet those targets. | 3 | Energy / electricity types covered by target | 4 | All electricity consumed (percentage) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 125828 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50541 | City of Greensboro | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.11 | If city staff pensions are managed at the city level, who has responsibility for making investments decisions for the city retirement funds? | 1 | Does the department/institution have responsibility for oversight and/or implementation of investment of the city retirement funds? | 4 | Other staff | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 125829 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54114 | City of Asheville | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 4 | Average concentration for third most recent year available (ug/m3) | 6 | O3 (Daily maximum 8 hour mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125830 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 1184 | City of Austin | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0b | Please provide details of your total fixed level target(s). | 6 | Projected population in target year | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125831 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58626 | City of Racine, WI | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 13 | Description of the stakeholder engagement processes | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125832 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54104 | City of Boulder | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 5 | Estimated emissions reduction (metric tonnes CO2e) | 4 | 2098 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125833 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35859 | City of Cleveland | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 24 | AFOLU > Other AFOLU | Not Estimated | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 125834 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 10 | Comment | 17 | Diesel Marine emissions from City Marine Fleet (Ferries, Fire & Police Boats) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125835 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 60603 | City of Prince George, BC | Canada | North America | Energy | 8.0b | Please explain why you do not have a renewable energy or electricity target and any plans to introduce one in the future. | 2 | Comment | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125836 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74418 | Town of Breckenridge, CO | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.3a | Please report on how climate change impacts health outcomes and health services in your city. | 5 | Timescale of climate-related issues for the selected health area | 2 | Medium-term (2026-2050) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125837 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Opportunities | 6.0 | Please indicate the opportunities your city has identified as a result of addressing climate change and describe how the city is positioning itself to take advantage of these opportunities. | 2 | Describe how the city is maximizing this opportunity | 3 | In 2018, the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB), staffed by COG, approved Visualize 2045, a federally mandated, long-range transportation plan for the region. Visualize 2045 shows land use and transportation projects being planned for the region to support forecasted growth in population and employment. The performance analysis of the Visualize 2045 constrained elements projects long-term GHG reductions relative to today due to factors such as:•Growth in the region’s vehicle miles travelled (VMT) (20%) will be less than population growth (23%), which means that on average, a person is forecast to drive 3 percent fewer miles in 2045.•More residents will have better access to high-capacity transit in the future. In 2045, 38% of the region’s population is forecast to live within walking distance of such transit, compared to 29% today. Furthermore, 59% of jobs will be accessible by high-capacity transit, compared to 51% today.•By 2045, 71 percent of Activity Centers will be connected to high-capacity transit, up from 59%. •The region’s residents can reach 369,000 jobs within a 45-minute transit commute in the morning peak period. By 2045, with addition of population and jobs, mostly in or near Activity Centers and high capacity transit stations, and transit improvements, residents will be able to access 518,000 jobs within a 45-minute transit commute, which is a 40% increase relative to today. •Today, on average, the region’s residents can reach 864,000 jobs within a 45-minute drive from home in the morning peak period. By 2045, with the addition of population and jobs, mostly in Activity Centers, and transportation improvements, residents will be able to access 909,000 jobs within a 45-minute auto commute. The TPB’s Visualize 2045 Plan includes seven initiatives representing priorities to significantly improve the region’s transportation system performance, including achieving further GHG emissions reductions. • Bring Jobs and Housing Closer Together• Expand Bus Rapid Transit and Transitways Regionwide• Move More People on Metrorail• Provide More Telecommuting and Other Options for Commuting• Expand Express Highway Network with Enhanced Express Bus System• Improve Walk and Bike Access to Transit• Complete the National Capital Trail NetworkIn 2020, the TPB Board identified climate change as a top priority. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125838 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59572 | District of Saanich, BC | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 13 | Select the initiatives that this target contributes towards | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125839 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58627 | City of Alton, IL | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 24 | AFOLU > Other AFOLU | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 125840 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49327 | City of Providence | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 1 | Adaptation goal | 6 | Support the development of a Green Port initiative. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125841 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 60599 | Town of Bridgewater, NS | Canada | North America | Buildings | 9.3 | Is your city implementing any requirements to achieve net zero carbon existing buildings? For example, regulations, codes or planning policies requiring Passive House or other ultra-high efficiency standards for existing buildings being implemented. | 1 | Response | 1 | Net zero carbon existing buildings | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125842 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35859 | City of Cleveland | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 1 | Job creation | For all emission reduction activities, the anticipated emissions reductions are for annual emission reductions in the year 2030. These are not cumulative emission reductions up to 2030. In 2019-2020, the City will be developing a pathway to 100% renewable by 2050, which will provide more detailed reduction estimates out to 2050.Assumptions:1) An assumptions of constant energy demand from 2017 through 2030 is made for energy efficiency calculations. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 125843 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59550 | City of Bend, OR | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 2 | Where data is not available, please explain why | 9 | Waste: waste generated within the city boundary – Scope 3 (III.X.2) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125844 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58357 | City of West Hollywood | United States of America | North America | Food | 12.4 | How does your city increase access to sustainable foods? | 2 | Please provide details and/or links to more information about the actions your city is taking to increase access to sustainable foods | 2 | Do you tax/ban higher carbon foods (meat, dairy, ultra-processed)? | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 125845 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50566 | City of Anchorage | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 1 | Persons with chronic diseases | http://cespubs.uaf.edu/index.php/download_file/1430/ https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2016/03/climate-change-impacts-in-anchorage.pdf | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 125846 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73301 | City of Gretna, LA | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.3 | What is the amount of your city’s total solid waste collected for each of the following sectors (tonnes/year)? | 1 | Amount of solid waste generated (tonnes/year) | 2 | Residential | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125847 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43914 | City of Charlotte | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.1 | How much of the solid waste generated in your city is disposed to landfill or incineration (tonnes/year)? | 0 | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||||
| 125848 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49333 | City of Louisville, KY | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 1 | Stationary energy > Residential buildings | N/A | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 125849 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54037 | City of Des Moines | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 4 | Base year | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 125850 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43914 | City of Charlotte | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.0 | What is the total tCO2e emissions per capita from existing commercial, institutional and residential buildings in your city? | 1 | Total tonnes of CO2e emissions per capita | 5 | All building types | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
