Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 132851 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50559 | City of St Catharines, ON | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 5 | Emissions occurring outside the city boundary as a result of in-city activities (metric tonnes CO2e) | 22 | AFOLU > Livestock | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132852 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 60656 | City of Piedmont, CA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 21 | Total IPPU | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 132853 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50566 | City of Anchorage | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply | 14.2a | Please identify the risks to your city’s water security as well as the timescale and level of risk. | 1 | Water security risk drivers | 1 | Increased water stress | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132854 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50541 | City of Greensboro | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.4 | Please list the stakeholder engagement activities for each relevant stakeholder group. | 1 | Name of the stakeholder group | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132855 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43912 | City of Edmonton | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 11 | Does this target align with the global 1.5 - 2 °C pathway set out in the Paris Agreement? | 1 | No | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132856 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58627 | City of Alton, IL | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.3 | What is the amount of your city’s total solid waste collected for each of the following sectors (tonnes/year)? | 1 | Amount of solid waste generated (tonnes/year) | 5 | Construction and demolition waste | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132857 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59678 | City of Evanston, IL | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 6 | Primary author of assessment | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132858 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 10894 | City of Los Angeles | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6d | Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your city-wide emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by IPCC sector in the table below. | 4 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132859 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35859 | City of Cleveland | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | Re-stating previous emissions inventories | 4.14a | Please provide your city’s recalculated total city-wide emissions figures for any previous inventories along with Scope 1, 2 and 3 breakdowns where applicable. | 1 | Inventory date from | 8 | 2016-01-01 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132860 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74558 | Summit County, UT | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 7 | Please explain any excluded sources, identify any emissions covered under an ETS and provide any other comments | 24 | AFOLU > Other AFOLU | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 132861 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35870 | City of Miami | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Opportunities | 6.0 | Please indicate the opportunities your city has identified as a result of addressing climate change and describe how the city is positioning itself to take advantage of these opportunities. | 2 | Describe how the city is maximizing this opportunity | 1 | Increased sea level rise and other current and projected impacts will require additional infrastructure investment to adapt. -Miami Forever Bond passed in 2017 which funds $198 million dollars for sea level rise and resilience projects. “The intent of Miami Forever Bond is to build a stronger, more resilient future for Miami, alleviating existing and future risks to residents, economy, tourism and the city’s legacy. The Bond will fund a series of projects that will transform the future of Miami by investing a total of $400 million in five key categories, which align with the City’s most pressing needs: Sea-Level Rise and Flood Prevention, Roadways, Parks and Cultural Facilities, Public Safety and Affordable Housing. Bond projects will benefit current and future residents, businesses and visitors, while also creating jobs and lowering costs related to sea-level rise and increased storm events. (from City of Miami - Miami Forever Bond website)”-FEMA has now adopted a resilience lens to its projects dedicating more money towards hazard mitigation as opposed to restoration projects that lead to repetitive loss. City of Miami has applied for FEMA funding from Hurricane Irma to invest in a number of resilience projects.-US Army Corps of Engineers is investing $4.6 Billion in storm surge protective measures in Miami-Dade County as part of their Back Bay plan. We have provided feedback and guidance to this plan to help drive funds towards projects of greatest need, that will promote equity, and integrate use of green infrastructure. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132862 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43914 | City of Charlotte | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 1 | Mitigation action | 5 | Finance and Economic Development > Developing the green economy | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132863 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54119 | City of Palo Alto | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply Management | 14.4a | Please provide more information on your city’s public Water Resource Management strategy. | 2 | Year of adoption from local government | 1 | 2016 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132864 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 36410 | City of Memphis | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 12 | Select the initiatives that this target contributes towards | 1 | Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132865 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63562 | City of South Bend, IN | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.5 | Please attach your city-wide inventory in Excel or other spreadsheet format and provide additional details on the inventory calculation methods in the table below. | 7 | Overall level of confidence | 1 | Medium | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132866 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54114 | City of Asheville | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.1 | Please indicate the source mix of electricity consumed in your city. | 4 | Nuclear | 1 | Electricity source | 31.6 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132867 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50545 | City of Henderson | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 2 | Average concentration for most recent year available (ug/m3) | 6 | O3 (Daily maximum 8 hour mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132868 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63862 | City of Ashland, OR | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 1 | Most recent years available (select year) | 6 | O3 (Daily maximum 8 hour mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132869 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 16581 | City of Seattle | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.1 | Does your city have emissions reduction targets or energy efficiency targets for the following building types? | 3 | Energy efficiency target | 2 | Municipal | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132870 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 17 | Name of the stakeholder group | 2 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132871 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63862 | City of Ashland, OR | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 11 | Finance status | 7 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 132872 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848568 | Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.4 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 7 | Customer-drive carshares (e.g. Car2Go, Drivenow) fleet size | 1 | Total fleet size | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 132873 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58591 | City of Greenbelt, MD | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 30 | Total Generation of grid-supplied energy | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132874 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59537 | City of Denton, TX | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.5 | Please attach your city-wide inventory in Excel or other spreadsheet format and provide additional details on the inventory calculation methods in the table below. | 4 | Global Warming Potential (select relevant IPCC Assessment Report) | 1 | IPCC 5th AR (2013) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132875 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35883 | City of San José | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 8 | Action description and implementation progress | 5 | The City of San José is collaborating with Santa Clara University to conduct a heat mapping campaign this August for Santa Clara County, funded by an Urban Heat Island mapping grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Integrated Heat Health Information System. Heat mapping was conducted on August 26 by community volunteers who drove along designated routes with sensors provided by CAPA Heat Watch (https://www.capastrategies.com/capa-heat-watch/). The data gathered will be used to build detailed urban heat island maps which we will use to target future heat mitigation work in the areas that are most vulnerable to extreme heat.The City contributed $10,000 to the cost for this project but we do not know the total cost of the project. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132876 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31182 | City of San Francisco | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 9 | Transportation > Rail | 12178 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 132877 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54100 | City of Columbia, MO | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.2 | What is the mode share of each transport mode in your city for freight transport? | 1 | Mode share | 1 | Motorcycle | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132878 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74418 | Town of Breckenridge, CO | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 17 | Waste > Wastewater | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 132879 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49345 | City of Birmingham | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 8 | Transportation > On-road | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 132880 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50566 | City of Anchorage | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 1 | Persons with disabilities | http://cespubs.uaf.edu/index.php/download_file/1430/ https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2016/03/climate-change-impacts-in-anchorage.pdf | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 132881 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63601 | Township of Maplewood, NJ | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.3 | What is the amount of your city’s total solid waste collected for each of the following sectors (tonnes/year)? | 1 | Amount of solid waste generated (tonnes/year) | 2 | Residential | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132882 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 13 | Total cost provided by the local government | 8 | 1750000 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132883 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50543 | Halifax Regional Municipality | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 20 | Aim of the engagement activities | 10 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132884 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74531 | Santa Fe County | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Collaboration | 6.2a | Please provide some key examples of how your city collaborates with business in the table below. | 2 | Type of collaboration | 1 | Financial mechanism (grants etc.) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132885 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 11 | Finance status | 17 | Finance secured | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132886 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54109 | City of Bloomington | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.7a | Please complete the table reporting your local government Scope 3 emissions. | 2 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 3 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132887 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74423 | City of Key West, FL | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.5a | Please provide details on your city’s energy efficiency targets. | 10 | Please indicate to which energy sector(s) the target applies (Multiple choice) | 1 | Public facility | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 132888 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 14344 | City of Park City, UT | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 7 | Please explain any excluded sources, identify any emissions covered under an ETS and provide any other comments | 17 | Waste > Wastewater | There is no wastewater treated inside the City.Includes Nitrification/Denitrification Process, N2O Emissions from Wastewater Treatment, and Process N2O from Effluent Discharge to Rivers and Estuaries.Wastewater treatment data came from Snyderville Water Reclamation District. All wastewater is treated outside of City limits at two treatment plants: East Canyon Water Reclamation Facility (ECWRF) and Silver Creek Water Reclamation Facility (SCWRF). The City contributes 52% of annual District flow or, an average daily flow of 1.89 MGD. No digester gas is produced and no digester gas is flared. The plants use an anaerobic process and nitrification and denitrification processes. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 132889 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59642 | City of Dublin, CA | United States of America | North America | Food | 12.0a | Report the tonnes per food group that are served and/or sold through programs managed by your city (this includes schools, canteens, hospitals etc.). | 2 | Comment | 4 | Whole grains | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132890 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43912 | City of Edmonton | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 14 | Majority funding source | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 132891 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49345 | City of Birmingham | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 7 | If the city boundary is different from the plan boundary, please explain why | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132892 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58871 | City of Salem, MA | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 5 | Means of implementation | 3 | Capacity building and training activities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132893 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43907 | City of Indianapolis | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.1 | Does your city have emissions reduction targets or energy efficiency targets for the following building types? | 3 | Energy efficiency target | 2 | Municipal | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132894 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58668 | City of New Bedford, MA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.2 | Please identify and describe the factors that most greatly affect your city’s ability to adapt to climate change and indicate how those factors either support or challenge this ability. | 3 | Level of degree to which factor challenges/supports the adaptive capacity of your city | 2 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 132895 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73669 | San Luis Obispo | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6f | Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your city-wide emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by end user (buildings, water, waste, transport), economic sector (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional), or any other classification system used in your city. | 1 | Source | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132896 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 2430 | City of Burlington | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 7 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 132897 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49342 | City of Rochester | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 8 | Action description and implementation progress | 1 | Climate Change Resilience Plan (completed in fall 2019) recommends various strategies that will increase resilience and improve adaptation to climate change impacts in Rochester, including extreme storms/flooding which are projected to increase in frequency and severity. The plan will investigate impacts of extreme rain/flooding on the focus areas of infrastructure, natural resources and socioeconomic sector. Strategies for adaptation, including resilient building and street design and green infrastructure, and public outreach and awareness of the issues are being considered in the Plan to account for increased storms, extreme weather, flooding events. Special emphasis for ensuring the health and safety of vulnerable populations during extreme rain/flood events is being included in the plan. The City received input from the Plan's Technical Advisory Committee stakeholders engaged with vulnerable populations, and the public and incorporated feedback into the final plan. In addition to the plan, the City has been implementing some green infrastructure projects (including rain gardens, porous pavement, green roofs, bioswales), has developed a Green infrastructure retrofit manual for future planning. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132898 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58626 | City of Racine, WI | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.1 | What is the mode share of each transport mode in your city for passenger transport? | 1 | Private motorized transport | 1 | Please complete | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 132899 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63862 | City of Ashland, OR | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.4 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 1 | Number of private cars | 5 | Hydrogen | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 132900 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 55800 | City of Cambridge | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.2 | What scale is the electricity mix data reported above? | 0 | 0 | Regional/State electricity mix reported | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
