Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 139251 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 10495 | City of Las Vegas | United States of America | North America | Food | 12.0a | Report the tonnes per food group that are served and/or sold through programs managed by your city (this includes schools, canteens, hospitals etc.). | 2 | Comment | 3 | Dairy foods | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139252 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35894 | Ville de Montreal | Canada | North America | Food | 12.0a | Report the tonnes per food group that are served and/or sold through programs managed by your city (this includes schools, canteens, hospitals etc.). | 2 | Comment | 7 | Added fats | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 139253 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35879 | City of Minneapolis | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 7 | Please explain any excluded sources, identify any emissions covered under an ETS and provide any other comments | 30 | Total Generation of grid-supplied energy | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139254 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59669 | City of North Vancouver | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 8 | Development and implementation of action plan | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139255 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74463 | Village of Park Forest, IL | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 25 | Total AFOLU | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 139256 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59642 | City of Dublin, CA | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 8 | Who owns the data? | 4 | PM10 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139257 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54034 | City of Grand Rapids | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.1 | Does your city have emissions reduction targets or energy efficiency targets for the following building types? | 2 | Please provide more details and/or link to more information about the emission reduction target. | 2 | Municipal | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139258 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53959 | City of Fayetteville, AR | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.2 | Please identify and describe the factors that most greatly affect your city’s ability to adapt to climate change and indicate how those factors either support or challenge this ability. | 2 | Indicate if this factor either supports or challenges the ability to adapt | 5 | Challenges | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139259 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 10495 | City of Las Vegas | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 20 | Verification activities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139260 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43910 | City of Columbus | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 2 | Climate hazards that adaptation goal addresses | 2 | Water Scarcity > Drought | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139261 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59633 | City of Santa Cruz, CA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.3a | Please report on how climate change impacts health outcomes and health services in your city. | 1 | Area affected by climate change | 1 | Health outcomes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139262 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 52894 | City of Winston-Salem | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.1 | Does your city have emissions reduction targets or energy efficiency targets for the following building types? | 4 | Please provide more details and/or link to more information about the energy efficiency target. | 2 | Municipal | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139263 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54082 | City of Hollywood, FL | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6c | Please provide a breakdown of your GHG emissions by scope. Where values are not available, please use the comment field to indicate the reason why. | 6 | Total Scope 1 emissions - please ensure this matches the calculated total above | 1 | City-wide emissions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 139264 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 834373 | Town of York, ME | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.1 | Describe how your city identified and prioritized adaptation actions to implement. | 2 | Comment | 1 | Identifying and prioritizing adaptation actions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 139265 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35393 | City of St Louis | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 18 | Role in the GCC program | 1 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139266 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54124 | City of Fremont | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 3 | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling (metric tonnes CO2e) | 21 | Total IPPU | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139267 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74594 | City of Boynton Beach | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.9 | How many public access EV charging points do you have in your city and/or metropolitan area for the following types. | 3 | Comment | 2 | Fast 7-22kw | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139268 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 55419 | City of Miramar | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.9 | How many public access EV charging points do you have in your city and/or metropolitan area for the following types. | 2 | Number of charging points in your metropolitan area | 3 | Slow 3kw or below | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139269 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 841964 | City of Hallandale Beach, FL | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 5 | Ecosystem preservation and biodiversity improvement | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139270 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50578 | City of Windsor | Canada | North America | Food | 12.0a | Report the tonnes per food group that are served and/or sold through programs managed by your city (this includes schools, canteens, hospitals etc.). | 2 | Comment | 1 | Vegetables | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139271 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59563 | City of Takoma Park, MD | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Planning | 5.5a | Please attach your city’s climate change mitigation plan below. If your city has both mitigation and energy access plans, please make sure to attach all relevant documents below. | 10 | Describe the synergies, trade-offs, and co-benefits of this interaction | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 139272 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49333 | City of Louisville, KY | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 7 | Sectors/areas adaptation action applies to | 17 | Transport (Mobility) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139273 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54098 | City of Thunder Bay | Canada | North America | Buildings | 9.2 | Is your city implementing a strategy/pathway/roadmap to ensure that all new buildings are net zero carbon operational by 2030? | 2 | Building types that the policy applies to | 1 | Please complete | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139274 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59538 | City of Mississauga | Canada | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.7 | Has your city received/secured funding for any low carbon projects (e.g. energy efficiency, renewable energy, low emission vehicles, bus rapid transit, waste management) or climate adaptation projects from a development bank (e.g. World Bank, Asian Development Bank, etc.)? | 2 | Comment | 1 | Funding received/secured | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 139275 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50543 | Halifax Regional Municipality | Canada | North America | Transport | 10.6 | How many buses has your city procured in the last year? | 2 | Comment | 7 | Diesel | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139276 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53860 | City of Wilmington, NC | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 2 | Action | 2 | Sea level rise modelling | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139277 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50555 | City of Hamilton | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 2 | Category | 30 | Direct emissions | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139278 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 832610 | Orange County, NC | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 4 | Current magnitude of hazard | 1 | Medium High | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139279 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35877 | City of Pittsburgh | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 4 | Average concentration for third most recent year available (ug/m3) | 6 | O3 (Daily maximum 8 hour mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139280 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35883 | City of San José | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 13 | Description of the stakeholder engagement processes | 1 | The City held dozens of public meetings and hearings – from town hall-style forums and Council or committee meetings at City Hall to neighborhood association presentations and technical workshops – to gather feedback on a draft of the Climate Smart plan. These meetings typically included a short presentation followed by an opportunity for people to speak, write, and/or submit their thoughts and ideas. The City has held 38 community meetings and a majority of them were at venues in Spanish-speaking and Vietnamese-speaking neighborhoods, such as Roosevelt Community Center, the Vietnamese American Cultural Center, Alviso Youth Center, Emma Prusch Park, Plaza de Cesar Chavez, Downtown San José Library, Berryessa Community Center, Tropicana Lanai Neighborhood, and other community locations throughout San José. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139281 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73666 | Cuyahoga County | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 6 | Stationary energy > Fugitive emissions | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139282 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59669 | City of North Vancouver | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 4 | Emission factor source | 0 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 139283 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54070 | City of Eugene | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning Process | 3.6 | Please explain the level of inclusion of the planning process. | 0 | 0 | A key hallmark of climate action planning for the City of Eugene is the act of bringing our community along throughout the process. While we can always improve these processes, the following are examples of ways the city of Eugene included community members in the planning of this document: Mayor's Climate Recovery Ordinance Ad Hoc Work Group - this was a gathering of dozens of community members who were reconvened by the Mayor to provide input on the plan's progression. There were four meetings between the release of the first draft and the final approved draft climate action plan. Eugene Climate Collaborative - Early on in the process of updating the Climate and Energy Action Plan (CEAP) of 2010, staff recognized the need to utilize system's level actors to drive change within our community. Initially termed "Large Lever Shareholders", these 12 organizations which make up the ECC are large organizations that significantly impact community emissions and local processes. These include the city and county government, school districts, local hospital, utilities, higher education, the local transit district, and the local chamber of commerce. The Equity Panel - This panel was borne out of feedback from the Mayor's CRO Ad Hoc Work Group that equitable practices were sorely missing from the drafting process. After a rigorous application process, 6 local community based organizations were chosen to participate on the panel. These organization were paid for their service, and met 10 times in 2019. One outcome of the panel was a case study as well as set of 40 recommendations placed inside the final draft of the CAP2.0. These recommendations are to be vetted by staff and incorporated into mitigation and resiliency efforts as much as is possible. Citizen Advisory Committees - There are several commissions and committees set up through the city agency that appoint community members to provide additional capacity and oversight regarding certain issues. This includes the Eugene Sustainability Commission as well as the Budget Committee, which both provide additional research and community input into planning. Community Events - City staff attended numerous events throughout the two years the CAP2.0 was in progress. At these events, staff shared about the work and gathered feedback from community members. These events were instrumental in communicating about the work and upcoming opportunities to provide input moving forward. Unfocus Groups - Using support from a contracted agency, staff gathered input from community members about an individual action campaign that will be part of plan implementation moving forward. Community Survey - Towards the end of the drafting process, community members were given several weeks to provide feedback and ideas about actions they felt were missing from the current CAP2.0 draft. These actions were tabulated and sent to a local contractor for high level analysis. These actions were presented to city council, the Mayor's CRO Ad Hoc Work Group, and eventually staff organized them by theme to include them in the final draft of the CAP 2.0. Further analysis is to be done moving forward to find which actions can be included in the climate action planning. Public Forum, Public Hearings, Councils emails, phone calls, emails - The Eugene community is unique in the way community members provide input to city council and staff. Besides having direct access via email and telephone (available on our website), community members also have 1.5 hours every 2nd and 4th Monday of each month to address city council directly about any topic of their choosing. Over the past 2.5 years, community members have utilized this tool to express their thoughts, desires, and concerns to council which staff regularly note and address as needed.Moving forward, the City sees the vital need in centering equity in planning to mitigate the worst impacts of climate change on our most vulnerable community members and increase resiliency within marginalized communities, especially communities of color. To do this, the city will reconvene the Equity Panel, continue to utilize commissions and committees, and utilize grant opportunities to find innovative ways to build relationships and equity within our community. One of these opportunities includes grant funding we just received for increasing language accessibility within our Latinx communities in order to remove barriers to accessing information. The city will also continue to incorporate the use of the triple bottom line analysis in all its planning efforts, and as much as possible rely on feedback from community members to correct for inequitable practices. | COE TBL with additional COE actions.pdf, EP Recommendations ENGLISH 9.20.19.pdf, EP Recommendations SPANISH 9.24.19.pdf, Equity Panel Case Study_FOR PRINT.pdf | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139284 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 14344 | City of Park City, UT | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 5 | Estimated emissions reduction (metric tonnes CO2e) | 2 | 57.7 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139285 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50543 | Halifax Regional Municipality | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 25 | Total AFOLU | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 139286 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 10 | Comment | 16 | Electric Rail emissions from TTC -Toronto Transit Commission - Subways & Streetcars within Toronto | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139287 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73530 | Town of Lexington, MA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 21 | Attach reference document | 3 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139288 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53829 | City of Kingston, ON | Canada | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 10 | Completeness of data (%) | 1 | PM2.5 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139289 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73530 | Town of Lexington, MA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 11 | When do you first expect to experience those changes in frequency and intensity? | 3 | Immediately | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139290 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 55799 | Arlington, VA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 5 | Low-income households | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139291 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35877 | City of Pittsburgh | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.5 | List any mitigation, adaptation, water related or resilience projects you have planned within your city for which you hope to attract financing and provide details on the estimated costs and status of the project. If your city does not have any relevant projects, please select 'No relevant projects' under 'Project Area'. | 3 | Stage of project development | 1 | Pre-feasibility/impact assessment | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139292 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 1184 | City of Austin | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 5 | Means of implementation | 6 | Capacity building and training activities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139293 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 840269 | Town of Whitby, ON | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0c | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year intensity target. An intensity target is usually measured per capita or per unit GDP. If you have an absolute emissions reduction target, please select “Base year emissions (absolute) target” in question 5.0. | 7 | Base year emissions per intensity unit (metric tonnes CO2e per denominator) | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139294 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 5 | Means of implementation | 3 | Capacity building and training activities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139295 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54034 | City of Grand Rapids | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0b | Please provide details of your total fixed level target(s). | 7 | Target year absolute emissions goal (metric tonnes CO2e) | 4 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139296 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74453 | City of Highland Park, IL | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.0a | Please provide details of your renewable energy or electricity target(s) and how the city plans to meet those targets. | 1 | Scale | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 139297 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49342 | City of Rochester | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.9 | Does your city have a consumption-based inventory to measure emissions from consumption of goods and services by your residents? | 1 | Response | 1 | Please complete | Not intending to undertake | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 139298 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2 | Does your city council, or similar authority, have a published plan that addresses climate change adaptation? | 0 | 0 | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 139299 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73530 | Town of Lexington, MA | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.5 | List any mitigation, adaptation, water related or resilience projects you have planned within your city for which you hope to attract financing and provide details on the estimated costs and status of the project. If your city does not have any relevant projects, please select 'No relevant projects' under 'Project Area'. | 5 | Financing model identified | 2 | Do not know | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 139300 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 37241 | City of Berkeley | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 4 | Status of action | 1 | Scoping | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
