Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 146801 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35853 | City of Baltimore | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 22 | AFOLU > Livestock | Not Estimated | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146802 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58413 | City of Carmel, IN | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 6 | Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 1 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146803 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59572 | District of Saanich, BC | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 4 | Emission factor source | 3 | 2017/18 B.C. BEST PRACTICES METHODOLOGY FOR QUANTIFYING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INCLUDING GUIDANCE FOR PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND COMMUNITY EMISSIONS | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146804 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35475 | City of Calgary | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 27 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > CHP generation | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146805 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59633 | City of Santa Cruz, CA | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.6 | Has your city tested their climate actions through pilot/demonstration projects? | 1 | Pilot/demonstration projects | 1 | Tested by city government | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146806 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 832838 | Town of Wellfleet | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.5 | Please give the total amount of fuel (refers to Scope 1 emissions) that your local government has consumed this year. | 5 | Emissions (tonnes CO2e) | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146807 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31090 | District of Columbia | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 20 | Aim of the engagement activities | 29 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146808 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74594 | City of Boynton Beach | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 8 | Timescale of reduction / savings / energy production | 3 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 146809 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50540 | City of Albuquerque | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.4 | Please list the stakeholder engagement activities for each relevant stakeholder group. | 4 | Aim of the engagement activities | 0 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 146810 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 4 | Current magnitude of hazard | 2 | Medium High | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146811 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 3417 | New York City | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 23 | AFOLU > Land use | Not Estimated | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146812 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53879 | City of Jersey City | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.5a | Please provide details on your city’s energy efficiency targets. | 6 | Total energy consumed/produced covered by target in target year (in unit specified in column 2) | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 146813 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54104 | City of Boulder | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.4 | What is the amount of solid waste being treated (tonnes/year) through the methods listed. | 1 | Tonnes/year | 1 | Re-use | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146814 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54088 | City of Peterborough | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2b | Please explain why there is no published plan that addresses climate change adaptation and outline any future arrangements you have to create a plan. | 2 | Comment | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146815 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35870 | City of Miami | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.3 | Please give the name of the primary protocol, standard, or methodology you have used to calculate your city’s city-wide GHG emissions. | 2 | Comment | 1 | Emissions methodology | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146816 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59631 | City of San Leandro, CA | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 4 | Status of action | 5 | Operation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146817 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59633 | City of Santa Cruz, CA | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply Management | 14.3 | Please select the actions you are taking to reduce the risks to your city’s water security. | 4 | Action description and implementation progress | 2 | City of Santa Cruz Climate Action Plan 2012B5: protect watershed land and vegetation; B6: protect water system infrastructure. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146818 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848568 | Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0d | Does your city have an update/revision process for the climate risk and vulnerability assessment? | 1 | Update/revision process in place | 1 | Update/revision process | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146819 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.0b | Please explain why you do not have a renewable energy or electricity target and any plans to introduce one in the future. | 1 | Reason | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146820 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35883 | City of San José | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply | 14.2a | Please identify the risks to your city’s water security as well as the timescale and level of risk. | 5 | Risk description | 3 | Over the past 120 years, California has become increasingly dry. The most recent drought from 2012 to 2016 was the most extreme since instrumental records began. Drought decreases the availability and quality of water for humans. This includes reduced water levels to fight wildfires. Drought may increase exposure to health hazards including wildfires, dust storms, extreme heat events, land subsidence, increased water pollution, erosion, degraded water quality, and reduced water quantity, degradation of watersheds, and alteration of ecosystems and loss of habitat. It can also lead to the emergence of new contagious and vector-borne disease. Although San José significantly cut back on its water consumption during the community’s most recent drought, a rebound is expected, and demand will continue to grow in the absence of long-term measures. It is in the community’s interest to curb its water use to reduce the strain on the water supply and be prepared for future droughts. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146821 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54110 | City of Santa Monica | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply Management | 14.4a | Please provide more information on your city’s public Water Resource Management strategy. | 4 | Does this strategy include sanitation services? | 1 | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146822 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 8 | Areas/sectors covered by the risk and vulnerability assessment | 8 | Other, please specify: Framework applies generally to all sectors relevant to running the city. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146823 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59633 | City of Santa Cruz, CA | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.4 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 7 | Customer-drive carshares (e.g. Car2Go, Drivenow) fleet size | 4 | Plug in hybrid | 0 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146824 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58626 | City of Racine, WI | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.1 | Does your city have emissions reduction targets or energy efficiency targets for the following building types? | 2 | Please provide more details and/or link to more information about the emission reduction target. | 1 | Commercial | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146825 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43909 | City of Orlando | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 1 | Most recent years available (select year) | 6 | O3 (Daily maximum 8 hour mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146826 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54026 | City of Tacoma | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 2 | Where data is not available, please explain why | 6 | Transportation – Scope 2 (II.X.2) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146827 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54085 | City of Savannah | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 1 | Stationary energy > Residential buildings | Not Estimated | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146828 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49334 | City of Richmond, VA | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.12 | What is the most recent calendar year for which you have air quality data? | 0 | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||||
| 146829 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74414 | Boulder County | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 5 | Stationary energy > Agriculture | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146830 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35883 | City of San José | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 7 | Disaster Risk Reduction | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146831 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 60656 | City of Piedmont, CA | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.4 | Which gases are included in your emissions inventory? | 0 | 0 | CO2 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 146832 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49334 | City of Richmond, VA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 1 | Emergency services | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146833 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54034 | City of Grand Rapids | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0a | Please select the primary process or methodology used to undertake the risk and vulnerability assessment of your city. | 1 | Primary methodology | 1 | Risk assessment methodology | Unknown | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146834 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848568 | Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 13 | Total Transport | 12515115 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146835 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73666 | Cuyahoga County | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 1 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 3 | Stationary Energy: energy use – Scope 3 (I.X.3) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146836 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54109 | City of Bloomington | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 21 | Infrastructure development | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146837 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 21 | Attach reference document | 10 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146838 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73301 | City of Gretna, LA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 9 | Future change in intensity | 1 | Increasing | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146839 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74546 | City of Milwaukie, OR | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 8 | Areas/sectors covered by the risk and vulnerability assessment | 1 | Public health | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146840 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Transport | 10.9 | How many public access EV charging points do you have in your city and/or metropolitan area for the following types. | 3 | Comment | 2 | Fast 7-22kw | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 146841 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49327 | City of Providence | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 9 | Please explain | 6 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 146842 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35859 | City of Cleveland | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.5a | Please provide details on your city’s energy efficiency targets. | 7 | Percentage of energy efficiency improvement in target year compared to base year levels | 1 | 18 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 146843 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54098 | City of Thunder Bay | Canada | North America | Transport | 10.4 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 7 | Customer-drive carshares (e.g. Car2Go, Drivenow) fleet size | 2 | Electric | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 146844 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54114 | City of Asheville | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 18 | Total Waste | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146845 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35393 | City of St Louis | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.9 | How many public access EV charging points do you have in your city and/or metropolitan area for the following types. | 3 | Comment | 3 | Slow 3kw or below | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146846 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74423 | City of Key West, FL | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.5 | List any mitigation, adaptation, water related or resilience projects you have planned within your city for which you hope to attract financing and provide details on the estimated costs and status of the project. If your city does not have any relevant projects, please select 'No relevant projects' under 'Project Area'. | 1 | Project area | 2 | Waste recycling | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146847 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50541 | City of Greensboro | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.7 | If the submitted GHG inventory is baseline inventory for target setting, please provide the Baseline Synthesis Report and stakeholder consultation process and results to this inventory. | 2 | Baseline synthesis report | 1 | Please complete | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 146848 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 11 | Finance status | 5 | Finance secured | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 146849 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35859 | City of Cleveland | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 15 | Target meets initial GCoM validation criteria | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 146850 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59669 | City of North Vancouver | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 7 | Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
