Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 152001 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59563 | City of Takoma Park, MD | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 6 | Persons living in sub-standard housing | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152002 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58513 | City of Medford | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6f | Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your city-wide emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by end user (buildings, water, waste, transport), economic sector (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional), or any other classification system used in your city. | 1 | Source | 13 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152003 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 60599 | Town of Bridgewater, NS | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 7 | Please explain any excluded sources, identify any emissions covered under an ETS and provide any other comments | 14 | Waste > Solid waste disposal | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 152004 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54100 | City of Columbia, MO | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 11 | Total cost of the project (currency) | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 152005 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63862 | City of Ashland, OR | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 14 | Majority funding source | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 152006 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 10495 | City of Las Vegas | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 21 | Attach reference document | 11 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152007 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59631 | City of San Leandro, CA | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 7 | Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152008 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 2430 | City of Burlington | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 5 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 152009 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54111 | City of Iowa City | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.5 | Please give the total amount of fuel (refers to Scope 1 emissions) that your local government has consumed this year. | 3 | Amount | 6 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152010 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63601 | Township of Maplewood, NJ | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 6 | Frequency of measurements (e.g. hourly, daily) | 5 | NO2 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152011 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50566 | City of Anchorage | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 3 | Fuel type or activity | 12 | Diesel oil | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152012 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50568 | City of Saskatoon | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 8 | Areas/sectors covered by the risk and vulnerability assessment | 1 | Waste Management | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152013 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54110 | City of Santa Monica | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 1 | Mitigation action | 10 | Mass Transit > Smart public transport | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152014 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58621 | Town of Blacksburg | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 2 | Average concentration for most recent year available (ug/m3) | 2 | PM2.5 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152015 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74594 | City of Boynton Beach | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 3 | Average concentration for second most recent year available (ug/m3) | 2 | PM2.5 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152016 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50541 | City of Greensboro | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 10 | Future expected magnitude of hazard | 6 | High | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152017 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50578 | City of Windsor | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 2 | Action | 15 | Tree planting and/or creation of green space | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152018 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58668 | City of New Bedford, MA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 2 | Where data is not available, please explain why | 16 | TOTAL BASIC emissions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 152019 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54092 | City of Ann Arbor | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 3 | Year of publication or approval from local government | 1 | 2017 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152020 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35475 | City of Calgary | Canada | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.9 | Has your city taken steps to decarbonize the investments held by the city retirement funds and/or municipal investments, e.g. by making a commitment to divest from fossil fuels and/or increase sustainable investments? | 2 | Please provide more details about how your city is taking steps to decarbonize the investments | 2 | Investments held by the city retirement funds, e.g. by making a commitment to divest from fossil fuels and/or increase sustainable investments? | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152021 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49342 | City of Rochester | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 8 | Action description and implementation progress | 3 | Climate Change Resilience Plan ( completed in fall 2019) recommends various strategies that will increase resilience and improve adaptation to climate change impacts in Rochester, including extreme heat events which are projected to increase in frequency and severity. The plan investigates impacts of extreme heat on the focus areas of infrastructure, natural resources and socioeconomic sector. Strategies for adaptation, including working with stakeholder to develop a heat emergency plan, increase access to energy efficient and clean building cooling technology, mapping high heat vulnerability zones, expansion of cooling centers, public awareness and emergency preparedness education, and a special emphasis on health and safety of vulnerable populations is being considered in the plan. The City incorporated input from the Plan's Technical Advisory Committee, stakeholders engaged with vulnerable populations, and the public, into the final plan. In addition to the plan, the City has been implementing the Cool Sweep program that provides access to pools, spray parks, and recreation centers for extended hours during heat waves. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152022 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54078 | City of Hayward | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | Historical emissions inventories | 4.13 | Please provide details on any historical and base year city-wide emissions inventories your city has, in order to allow assessment of targets in the table below. | 4 | Previous emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 1 | 1082891 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152023 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 16581 | City of Seattle | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 2 | Action title | 3 | Seattle City Light Charging Program | The projected emissions reductions from new strategies can be found in the 2018 Climate Action document: http://durkan.seattle.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/SeaClimateAction_April2018.pdf | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 152024 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49347 | City of Omaha | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 3 | Transport | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152025 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50550 | City of Buffalo | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 3 | Average concentration for second most recent year available (ug/m3) | 7 | SO2 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152026 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54088 | City of Peterborough | Canada | North America | Opportunities | Opportunities | 6.0 | Please indicate the opportunities your city has identified as a result of addressing climate change and describe how the city is positioning itself to take advantage of these opportunities. | 2 | Describe how the city is maximizing this opportunity | 4 | City-wide composting facility is in the planning phase of development. Diverting compostable material away from the city landfill will substantially reduce methane emissions. The facility is slated to be open in 2023. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152027 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50541 | City of Greensboro | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 14 | Waste > Solid waste disposal | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 152028 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73666 | Cuyahoga County | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.4 | What is the amount of solid waste being treated (tonnes/year) through the methods listed. | 1 | Tonnes/year | 4 | Anaerobic digestion | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152029 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59644 | City of Culver City, CA | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Opportunities | 6.0 | Please indicate the opportunities your city has identified as a result of addressing climate change and describe how the city is positioning itself to take advantage of these opportunities. | 2 | Describe how the city is maximizing this opportunity | 4 | Culver City launched a Sustainable Business Certificate program in 2017 to recognize businesses that implement best practices and policies that reduce energy use, conserve water, reduce pollution, and divert waste. Through the program, the City provides businesses with the tools and resources they need to meet certification requirements. A checklist provides strategies for reducing energy use, improving water conservation, preventing pollution, reducing solid waste, and information on sustainable methods of transportation. The City recognized 12 businesses through this program. Collectively, they saved 10,310 kWh of electricity annually and 1,598,593 gallons of water (an average savings of 53%). | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152030 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31177 | Salt Lake City | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 1 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 8 | Waste: waste generated within the city boundary – Scope 1 (III.X.1) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 152031 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58626 | City of Racine, WI | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.5 | Please describe to what extent the planning process is transparent and open. | 1 | The climate adaptation/mitigation plan makes opportunities for engagement that civil society had during the planning process explicit | 1 | Planning process | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 152032 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 32550 | City of Denver | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0c | Please explain why your city does not have a climate risk and vulnerability assessment. | 2 | Comment | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 152033 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31090 | District of Columbia | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 1 | Applicable sub-sector | 16 | CRF - Stationary energy > Residential buildings | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152034 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74488 | City of Beverly, MA | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply Management | 14.4a | Please provide more information on your city’s public Water Resource Management strategy. | 1 | Publication title and attach document | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152035 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54108 | City of Durham | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 8 | Who owns the data? | 5 | NO2 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152036 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848568 | Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Emissions Verification | 7.9b | Please explain why your local government operations inventory is not verified and describe any future plans for verification. | 2 | Explanation | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 152037 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 36410 | City of Memphis | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 2 | Average concentration for most recent year available (ug/m3) | 2 | PM2.5 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152038 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43909 | City of Orlando | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide external verification | 4.11 | Does your city have a strategy, or other policy document, in place for how to measure and reduce consumption-based GHG emissions in your city? | 2 | Please provide more details on and/or a link to the strategy | 3 | Transportation | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 152039 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59536 | City of Kitchener | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 15 | Total cost provided by the majority funding source (currency) | 2 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 152040 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58626 | City of Racine, WI | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 9 | Please explain | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152041 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58485 | Abington Township | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | Historical emissions inventories | 4.13 | Please provide details on any historical and base year city-wide emissions inventories your city has, in order to allow assessment of targets in the table below. | 8 | Comments | 1 | The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Greater Philadelphia Region. DVRPC works to promote regional cooperation in a 9-county, bi-state region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery (the county where Abington Township is located and the third largest Pennsylvania county), and Philadelphia counties in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC facilitates city, county and state representatives of this region to address key concerns such as transportation, land use, environmental protection and economic development. DVRPC conducts a regional Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory on a 5-year interval. A detailed guide outlining the methods and data sources used for DVRPC’s 2010 Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Greater Philadelphia, may be viewed at https://www.dvrpc.org/EnergyClimate/pdf/2010_Energy_Use_and_Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_in_Greater_Philadelphia-Methods_and_Sources.pdf. Abington Township's most recent inventory from DVRPC's 2015 inventory is summarized below: 1. DVRPC conducted a baseline inventory in 2005 which may be found at http://www.dvrpc.org/reports/09038A.pdf (Abington's results may be found on line 1 of page 66 or A-13 of this document under the Table "Montgomery County, PA – 2005 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allocated to Municipality (MTCO2E)"; 2. A 2010 inventory for which Abington Townships results may be found at http://www.dvrpc.org/webmaps/MunicipalEnergy/mcdDetail.aspxmcdcode=4209100156 under "GHG Emissions by Sector" which is further broken down at the end under "Non-Energy Greenhouse Gas Emissions"; and 3. The 2015 Inventory which may be found at https://www.dropbox.com/s/spoami2099bynff/DVRPC%202015%20Inventory_Abington%20Township%20-2018-07-09%20-%20FINAL.xlsxdl=0. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152042 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49330 | Kansas City | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | Historical emissions inventories | 4.13 | Please provide details on any historical and base year city-wide emissions inventories your city has, in order to allow assessment of targets in the table below. | 3 | Scopes / boundary covered | 1 | Scope 1 (direct) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152043 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50543 | Halifax Regional Municipality | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 2 | Climate hazards that adaptation goal addresses | 14 | Flood and sea level rise > Coastal flood | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152044 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43907 | City of Indianapolis | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.5 | Provide information on GHG emissions from the transport sector. | 2 | Inventory year (numerical year) | 5 | Passenger Transport: Taxi/TNC | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152045 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53829 | City of Kingston, ON | Canada | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 7 | Where can the data be accessed? | 5 | NO2 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152046 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35877 | City of Pittsburgh | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 30 | Total Generation of grid-supplied energy | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152047 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58310 | City of Roanoke | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0b | Please provide details of your total fixed level target(s). | 11 | Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of government? | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152048 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 52897 | City of Aspen | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 6 | Stationary energy > Fugitive emissions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 152049 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58513 | City of Medford | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 3 | Fuel type or activity | 12 | Diesel oil | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 152050 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73706 | City of Alameda | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.3a | Please report on how climate change impacts health outcomes and health services in your city. | 4 | Identify the climate-related health issues faced by your city | 1 | Disruption to water, sanitation and wastewater services | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
