Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 153301 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 1184 | City of Austin | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.4 | Please list the stakeholder engagement activities for each relevant stakeholder group. | 1 | Name of the stakeholder group | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153302 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50559 | City of St Catharines, ON | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 6 | Emission factor value | 5 | 2681.28 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153303 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74418 | Town of Breckenridge, CO | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 12 | Please describe the target and the modelling methodology(ies) and parameters used to define it | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153304 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35268 | City of Boston | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 9 | Publicly available? | 1 | PM2.5 (1 year (annual) mean) | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153305 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43910 | City of Columbus | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.7 | Has your city received/secured funding for any low carbon projects (e.g. energy efficiency, renewable energy, low emission vehicles, bus rapid transit, waste management) or climate adaptation projects from a development bank (e.g. World Bank, Asian Development Bank, etc.)? | 2 | Comment | 1 | Funding received/secured | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153306 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49334 | City of Richmond, VA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Planning | 5.5a | Please attach your city’s climate change mitigation plan below. If your city has both mitigation and energy access plans, please make sure to attach all relevant documents below. | 2 | Web link | 1 | http://www.richmondgov.com/Sustainability/Reports.aspx | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153307 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 57616 | City of Lake Forest, IL | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.2 | Please identify and describe the factors that most greatly affect your city’s ability to adapt to climate change and indicate how those factors either support or challenge this ability. | 4 | Please describe how the factor supports or challenges the adaptive capacity of your city | 2 | Lake Forest has a strong economy and its residents have above average income, allowing the city greater flexibility and ability to absorb cost increases, resource needs and other unanticipated hardships related to climate change. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153308 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59572 | District of Saanich, BC | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 2 | Where data is not available, please explain why | 10 | Waste: waste generated outside the city boundary – Scope 1 (III.X.3) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153309 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54104 | City of Boulder | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 3 | Sectors/areas covered by plan that addresses climate change adaptation | 1 | ICT (Information and Communication Technology) | Progress Report is here: https://www-static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/COB_Resilience_Progress_Report-1-201712081130.pdfFull strategy: https://www-static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/Resilience_Strategy_Final_Low-Res-1-201701120822.pdf?_ga=2.267462478.15810155.1559053032-1865843188.1539968573 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153310 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49335 | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 4 | Average concentration for third most recent year available (ug/m3) | 4 | PM10 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153311 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49333 | City of Louisville, KY | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 7 | Where can the data be accessed? | 7 | SO2 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153312 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54088 | City of Peterborough | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 3 | Reduced GHG emissions | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153313 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50544 | City of Aurora, IL | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 19 | Name of the engagement activities | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 153314 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58668 | City of New Bedford, MA | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.5 | Please describe to what extent the planning process is transparent and open. | 1 | The climate adaptation/mitigation plan makes opportunities for engagement that civil society had during the planning process explicit | 1 | Planning process | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153315 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35883 | City of San José | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Collaboration | 6.2a | Please provide some key examples of how your city collaborates with business in the table below. | 3 | Description of collaboration | 6 | With support through the American Cities Climate Challenge, the City has developed an electric vehicle public outreach and discount program called Drive Electric San José to significantly increase the number of electric vehicles on the road over the next several years. Drive Electric San José is a part of San José’s new Electric Mobility Roadmap, adopted in January 2020, a plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector, of which passenger vehicles are one of the largest contributors. Less than one percent of passenger vehicles on California roads are electric, even though the state has invested in EV production and charging stations. Studies show this is because the number of car-owning households that are aware of electric vehicles is not growing. Other challenges include low numbers of workplace and residential charging stations and the relatively high cost of electric vehicles, which may keep them out of reach for many households. In response to these challenges, the Department of Transportation has partnered with five local car dealerships (Capitol Chevy, Capitol Hyundai, Capitol Kia, Premier Nissan of Stevens Creek, and Stevens Creek Kia) to offer extra discounts of up to $3,200 on seven electric vehicle models from August 1-October 31, 2020, which customers can stack on top of local, state, and federal rebates for up to $13,500 in savings. The program also includes targeted public education and awareness about electric vehicles. Building on the one-stop-shop electric vehicle website page developed by San José Clean Energy, Department of Transportation worked with members of SJCE to develop and translate a new webpage, www.sanjosecleanenergy.org/drive-electric, EV buyer’s guide, flyers, and banners for City Hall, the five participating dealerships , and local co-marketing partners including Samsung, Adobe, and Santa Clara County. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153316 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59644 | City of Culver City, CA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 21 | Total IPPU | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153317 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54078 | City of Hayward | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 10 | Comment | 15 | Commercial | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153318 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58413 | City of Carmel, IN | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.4 | What is the amount of solid waste being treated (tonnes/year) through the methods listed. | 1 | Tonnes/year | 1 | Re-use | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153319 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73530 | Town of Lexington, MA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6c | Please provide a breakdown of your GHG emissions by scope. Where values are not available, please use the comment field to indicate the reason why. | 5 | Calculated Total Scope 1 emissions | 1 | City-wide emissions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153320 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54078 | City of Hayward | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 12 | Total cost of the project | 2 | 340000 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153321 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 3203 | City of Chicago | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 5 | Emissions occurring outside the city boundary as a result of in-city activities (metric tonnes CO2e) | 15 | Waste > Biological treatment | 103 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153322 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 1184 | City of Austin | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 9 | Future change in intensity | 4 | Increasing | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153323 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74531 | Santa Fe County | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.3 | What are the total number of journeys made in your city each year by each mode below? | 1 | Number of journeys made each year | 6 | Cycling | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153324 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35393 | City of St Louis | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Planning | 5.5a | Please attach your city’s climate change mitigation plan below. If your city has both mitigation and energy access plans, please make sure to attach all relevant documents below. | 12 | Does your plan include policy goals that explicitly reflect one of the following principles? | 1 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153325 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50555 | City of Hamilton | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 10 | Future expected magnitude of hazard | 2 | Medium High | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153326 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50544 | City of Aurora, IL | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 2 | Action | 1 | Public preparedness (including practice exercises/drills) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153327 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58513 | City of Medford | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 6 | Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 1 | 465879 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153328 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50545 | City of Henderson | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.11 | If city staff pensions are managed at the city level, who has responsibility for making investments decisions for the city retirement funds? | 2 | Comment | 1 | City council/elected representatives | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153329 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Energy | 8.0a | Please provide details of your renewable energy or electricity target(s) and how the city plans to meet those targets. | 4 | Base year | 3 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||||
| 153330 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35874 | City of Phoenix | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 3 | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling (metric tonnes CO2e) | 3 | Stationary energy > Institutional buildings & facilities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153331 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35853 | City of Baltimore | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 10 | Scope and impact of action | 9 | The City's utility BGE implemented smart grid technologies in the City of Baltimore, including the installation and deployment of smart meters throughout the City. The City has installed smart meters in a number of the larger buildings. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153332 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43910 | City of Columbus | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 11 | Transportation > Aviation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153333 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848567 | Mid-America Regional Council | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.9 | Has your city taken steps to decarbonize the investments held by the city retirement funds and/or municipal investments, e.g. by making a commitment to divest from fossil fuels and/or increase sustainable investments? | 2 | Please provide more details about how your city is taking steps to decarbonize the investments | 1 | Municipal investments, e.g. by divesting from fossil fuels | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153334 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53879 | City of Jersey City | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 3 | Fuel type or activity | 36 | Electricity | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153335 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50578 | City of Windsor | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 1 | Climate hazards | 83 | Extreme hot temperature > Extreme hot days | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153336 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 832838 | Town of Wellfleet | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.0b | Please explain why you do not have a renewable energy or electricity target and any plans to introduce one in the future. | 2 | Comment | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153337 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 3203 | City of Chicago | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 5 | Social impact of hazard overall | 4 | Increased demand for healthcare services | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153338 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 14344 | City of Park City, UT | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.4 | What is the amount of solid waste being treated (tonnes/year) through the methods listed. | 1 | Tonnes/year | 6 | Open burning | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153339 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59536 | City of Kitchener | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 14 | Waste > Solid waste disposal | 50828 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153340 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 7 | Where can the data be accessed? | 7 | SO2 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153341 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58357 | City of West Hollywood | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 2 | Monitor activities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153342 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 60656 | City of Piedmont, CA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 26 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > Electricity-only generation | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153343 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58483 | City of Surrey | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 13 | Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of sub-national government | 1 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153344 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35874 | City of Phoenix | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 1 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 5 | Transportation – Scope 1 (II.X.1) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153345 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 6 | Monitor activities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153346 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58668 | City of New Bedford, MA | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.8 | Please indicate if your local government operations emissions have increased, decreased, or stayed the same since your last emissions inventory, and please describe why. | 1 | Change in emissions | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 153347 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50568 | City of Saskatoon | Canada | North America | Transport | 10.4 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 6 | Transport Network Companies (e.g. Uber, Lyft) fleet size | 3 | Hybrid | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 153348 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35883 | City of San José | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 3 | Sectors/areas covered by plan that addresses climate change adaptation | 1 | Energy | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153349 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63601 | Township of Maplewood, NJ | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.3 | What are the total number of journeys made in your city each year by each mode below? | 1 | Number of journeys made each year | 4 | Ferries / River boats | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 153350 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35862 | City of Detroit | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.3 | What are the total number of journeys made in your city each year by each mode below? | 1 | Number of journeys made each year | 6 | Cycling | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
