Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 161951 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74401 | City of Encinitas, CA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 29 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > Local renewable generation | Integrated Elsewhere | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161952 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54110 | City of Santa Monica | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 2 | Action | 2 | Community engagement/education | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161953 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54034 | City of Grand Rapids | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 9 | Percentage reduction target from business as usual | 10 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161954 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35274 | City of Portland, ME | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.5 | Please give the total amount of fuel (refers to Scope 1 emissions) that your local government has consumed this year. | 5 | Emissions (tonnes CO2e) | 4 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161955 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 14344 | City of Park City, UT | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 3 | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling (metric tonnes CO2e) | 17 | Waste > Wastewater | 0 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161956 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54085 | City of Savannah | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 14 | Does this target correspond to a requirement from a higher level of government? | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161957 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74418 | Town of Breckenridge, CO | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 3 | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling (metric tonnes CO2e) | 11 | Transportation > Aviation | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161958 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43909 | City of Orlando | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.0 | Does your city incorporate sustainability goals and targets (e.g. GHG reductions) into the master planning for the city? | 0 | 0 | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 161959 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59642 | City of Dublin, CA | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.0a | Please detail which goals and targets are incorporated in your city’s master plan and describe how these goals are addressed in the table below. | 1 | Goal type | 1 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161960 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50578 | City of Windsor | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 47 | Enhanced climate change adaptation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161961 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35878 | City of Sacramento | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 9 | Percentage reduction target from business as usual | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161962 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49345 | City of Birmingham | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 5 | Emissions occurring outside the city boundary as a result of in-city activities (metric tonnes CO2e) | 22 | AFOLU > Livestock | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161963 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63941 | Broward County, FL | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6e | Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your city-wide emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by the US Community Protocol sources. | 3 | Scope | 2 | Scope 2 | Solid waste not available for 2018; Full breakdown available in ClearPath tool | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161964 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50560 | City of Oakland | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Planning | 5.5a | Please attach your city’s climate change mitigation plan below. If your city has both mitigation and energy access plans, please make sure to attach all relevant documents below. | 5 | Areas covered by action plan | 1 | Energy | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161965 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50540 | City of Albuquerque | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 1 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 15 | TOTAL Scope 3 emissions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161966 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74558 | Summit County, UT | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 2 | Other, please specify: Everyone is affected | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161967 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43909 | City of Orlando | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 3 | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling (metric tonnes CO2e) | 5 | Stationary energy > Agriculture | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161968 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54098 | City of Thunder Bay | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 6 | Energy savings (MWh) | 2 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 161969 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54037 | City of Des Moines | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 2 | Low-income households | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161970 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49333 | City of Louisville, KY | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 10 | Scope and impact of action | 3 | Bike Louisville, Louisville Metro's bicycle education and awareness program, works with residents and community partners across the city to encourage alternative transportation and biking in Louisville. Two of these initiatives include LouVelo, the city's bikeshare program, and the Louisville Loop, an estimated 100-mile trail system that will eventually encircle the city. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161971 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 55801 | City of West Palm Beach | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 21 | Total IPPU | Not Estimated | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161972 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74453 | City of Highland Park, IL | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.7 | Has your city received/secured funding for any low carbon projects (e.g. energy efficiency, renewable energy, low emission vehicles, bus rapid transit, waste management) or climate adaptation projects from a development bank (e.g. World Bank, Asian Development Bank, etc.)? | 2 | Comment | 1 | Funding received/secured | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161973 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54109 | City of Bloomington | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.4 | What is the amount of solid waste being treated (tonnes/year) through the methods listed. | 1 | Tonnes/year | 1 | Re-use | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161974 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49339 | City and County of Honolulu | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 3 | Food & agriculture | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161975 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49330 | Kansas City | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 1 | Sector | 1 | All emissions sources included in city inventory | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161976 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35883 | City of San José | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.4 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 8 | Comment | 1 | Total fleet size | The municipal fleet also includes additional low-carbon vehicles in categories that aren't included in this table: 551 diesel vehicles that run on 100% renewable diesel, and 13 liquid petroleum gas (LPG) vehicles. This means that 1039 vehicles in our fleet, or 45%, are low-carbon vehicles. | We have not been able to find data sources for the columns left empty. Taxi data are from the airport taxi fleet database. The database only notes whether taxis are conventional ICE vehicles or alternative fuel vehicles. The number of alternative fuel vehicles was split equally between electric, hybrid, and plug in hybrid as an estimate. Bus data are from the local public transit agency, the Valley Transportation Authority, and municipal fleet data are from the City Fleet Manager. Freight vehicle data are from the EMFAC fleet database (https://arb.ca.gov/emfac/fleet-db) and represent 2018 counts of medium and heavy duty vehicles registered in ZIP codes that lie within San Jose city boundaries. These data do not distinguish between gasoline and gas hybrid vehicles. Private car data are directly from the CA Department of Motor Vehicles, from the most recent dataset available at the city level, from October 2018. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161977 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50551 | City of Long Beach | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply Management | 14.3 | Please select the actions you are taking to reduce the risks to your city’s water security. | 2 | Adaptation action | 4 | Water recycling / reclamation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161978 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54113 | City of Flagstaff | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 16 | Waste > Incineration and open burning | Not Occurring | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161979 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 10495 | City of Las Vegas | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 5 | Estimated emissions reduction (metric tonnes CO2e) | 13 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 161980 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35857 | City of Cincinnati | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Publication title and attach the document | 2 | City Resilience Index | City Resilience Index - Cincinnati Quantitative 2019.pdf, CRI_Cincinnati Profiles and Data Review.pptx | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161981 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74563 | Town of Guilford, VT | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.5a | Please provide details on your city’s energy efficiency targets. | 6 | Total energy consumed/produced covered by target in target year (in unit specified in column 2) | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 161982 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 3417 | New York City | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6d | Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your city-wide emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by IPCC sector in the table below. | 4 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161983 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31108 | City of Houston | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.5 | Please give the total amount of fuel (refers to Scope 1 emissions) that your local government has consumed this year. | 5 | Emissions (tonnes CO2e) | 9 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161984 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59631 | City of San Leandro, CA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 3 | Current probability of hazard | 4 | Medium | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161985 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58485 | Abington Township | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.0a | Please detail which goals and targets are incorporated in your city’s master plan and describe how these goals are addressed in the table below. | 2 | How are these goals/targets addressed in the city master plan? | 3 | Transition Abington Township's vehicle fleet to 100% electric vehicles by 2030 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161986 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58591 | City of Greenbelt, MD | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 3 | Stationary energy > Institutional buildings & facilities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161987 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49330 | Kansas City | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 7 | Please explain any excluded sources, identify any emissions covered under an ETS and provide any other comments | 11 | Transportation > Aviation | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161988 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74401 | City of Encinitas, CA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 12 | Please describe the impacts experienced so far, and how you expect the hazard to impact in the future | 6 | Considering the City’s location, which runs along the coastline, sea-level rise is an important concern for potential climate-related risks. Sea-level rise may endanger the City in several key ways, including property damage to development along the coast; damage to transportation, electrical, and wastewater infrastructure; and compromised or lost public access to the coast. Sea-level rise in the City could also have considerable effects on coastal ecosystems, such as rocky intertidal areas, beaches, dunes, wetlands, estuaries, lagoons and tidal marshes, tidal flats, eelgrass beds, and tidally-influenced streams and rivers. Impacts can include coastal bluff erosion; alterations in long-shore sediment transport; and salt water intrusion into wetlands, estuaries, and aquifers. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161989 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54075 | City of Lakewood | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 5 | Emissions occurring outside the city boundary as a result of in-city activities (metric tonnes CO2e) | 12 | Transportation > Off-road | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161990 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35475 | City of Calgary | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 12 | Please describe the impacts experienced so far, and how you expect the hazard to impact in the future | 6 | The consequences of a multi-year drought are far reaching. In addition to the impact on local agriculture, droughts affect the health of plants, wildlife, wetlands, forests, parks, open spaces, recreational facilities and private yards. Drying out of forests increases the risk of wildfires, which impact both local air quality and even water quality if they occur upstream of the source of Calgary’s water supply. Trees and plants also become more susceptible to pest and disease outbreaks (e.g. pine beetles) since lack of water can stress trees, limiting their ability to react to these attacks.Alberta has a large farming and ranching community, and multi-year droughts could impact income of these families, and possibly lead to migration of rural people to the cities. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161991 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49333 | City of Louisville, KY | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.6 | Please provide total (Scope 1 + Scope 2) GHG emissions for your local government operations, in metric tonnes CO2e. | 2 | Total Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 1 | Local government emissions breakdown | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161992 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54116 | City of Dubuque | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.2 | Please identify and describe the factors that most greatly affect your city’s ability to adapt to climate change and indicate how those factors either support or challenge this ability. | 2 | Indicate if this factor either supports or challenges the ability to adapt | 1 | Challenges | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161993 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74488 | City of Beverly, MA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | Re-stating previous emissions inventories | 4.14a | Please provide your city’s recalculated total city-wide emissions figures for any previous inventories along with Scope 1, 2 and 3 breakdowns where applicable. | 4 | Previous emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161994 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49334 | City of Richmond, VA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 14 | Majority funding source | 3 | (Sub)national | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161995 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59550 | City of Bend, OR | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6e | Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your city-wide emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by the US Community Protocol sources. | 1 | US Community Protocol Sources | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161996 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59644 | City of Culver City, CA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 11 | Finance status | 10 | Finance secured | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 161997 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35268 | City of Boston | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.4 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 2 | Number of buses | 4 | Plug in hybrid | 0 | Private vehicle sources: Total - Boston Collecting Division, Electric and hybrid vehicles - Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) Massachusetts Vehicle Census (2014), Plug-in hybrid vehicles - Commonwealth of Massachusetts MOR-EV ProgramBuses: 727 Boston Public School buses in total (including 397 liquid propane-powered), 1022 MBTA buses (including 28 electric, 332 hybrid, 1 hydrogen)Municipal fleet: Boston Central Fleet ManagementFreight: Massachusetts Registry of Motor VehiclesTaxis: Boston Collecting Division | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161998 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50560 | City of Oakland | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 1 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 7 | Transportation – Scope 3 (II.X.3) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 161999 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 19 | Enhanced climate change adaptation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 162000 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54026 | City of Tacoma | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.0a | Please detail which goals and targets are incorporated in your city’s master plan and describe how these goals are addressed in the table below. | 1 | Goal type | 3 | Waste management targets | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
