Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 167651 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50578 | City of Windsor | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 12 | Total cost of the project | 11 | 12935705 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167652 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59572 | District of Saanich, BC | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 4 | Description of metric / indicator used to track goal | 5 | In development. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167653 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54075 | City of Lakewood | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.8 | Has your city established a fund to invest in energy efficiency, renewable energy or carbon reduction projects? | 2 | Comment | 1 | Funds | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 167654 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59669 | City of North Vancouver | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 12 | Please describe the impacts experienced so far, and how you expect the hazard to impact in the future | 7 | Drought: Increased risk of summer drought and water shortages due to decreased water supply and increased water use. Food insecurity due to disruption of the supply chain. Increased pressure from invasive species and stress on native species and habitat due to hydrologic changes and hotter and drier summers. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167655 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49342 | City of Rochester | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Opportunities | 6.0 | Please indicate the opportunities your city has identified as a result of addressing climate change and describe how the city is positioning itself to take advantage of these opportunities. | 2 | Describe how the city is maximizing this opportunity | 5 | EV charging stations being installed citywide to incentivize EV use. ROC EV initiative to raise awareness and promote EV use. Bike sharing program expanded to promote biking as a convenient means of transportation. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167656 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 3 | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling (metric tonnes CO2e) | 20 | IPPU > Product use | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167657 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 36410 | City of Memphis | United States of America | North America | Urban Planning | 11.1 | Report the total population living within 500m of a mass transit station, with mass transit defined as any Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), light rail, other rail-based transit modes or frequent bus services (average of five times an hour from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. on a weekday). | 2 | Comment | 1 | Total population living within 500m of a mass transit station | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167658 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50550 | City of Buffalo | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.2 | Please identify and describe the factors that most greatly affect your city’s ability to adapt to climate change and indicate how those factors either support or challenge this ability. | 1 | Factors that affect ability to adapt | 18 | Safety and security | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167659 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35874 | City of Phoenix | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 9 | Future change in intensity | 3 | Increasing | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167660 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 16581 | City of Seattle | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.3 | Please give the name of the primary protocol, standard, or methodology you have used to calculate your city’s city-wide GHG emissions. | 1 | Primary protocol | 1 | Emissions methodology | U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (ICLEI) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 167661 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63919 | City of Saratoga Springs, NY | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 14 | Update/revision process in place for the Adaptation Plan | 1 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167662 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73301 | City of Gretna, LA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 15 | Total cost provided by the majority funding source (currency) | 5 | see responses to 8.1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167663 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49327 | City of Providence | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Planning | 5.5 | Does your city have a climate change mitigation or energy access plan for reducing city-wide GHG emissions? | 0 | 0 | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 167664 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58485 | Abington Township | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.4 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 6 | Transport Network Companies (e.g. Uber, Lyft) fleet size | 4 | Plug in hybrid | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 167665 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54104 | City of Boulder | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 1 | Climate hazards | 2 | Wild fire > Land fire | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167666 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54048 | City of Knoxville | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 20 | IPPU > Product use | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 167667 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 4 | Emission factor source | 53 | US Environmental Protection Agency State Inventory Tool, AG Module | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167668 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74531 | Santa Fe County | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 9 | Publicly available? | 5 | NO2 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167669 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54119 | City of Palo Alto | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 3 | Average concentration for second most recent year available (ug/m3) | 6 | O3 (Daily maximum 8 hour mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167670 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 3203 | City of Chicago | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.3 | What is the amount of your city’s total solid waste collected for each of the following sectors (tonnes/year)? | 1 | Amount of solid waste generated (tonnes/year) | 3 | Commercial | 1230200.8 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167671 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 61790 | City of Emeryville, CA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 10 | Percentage of target achieved so far | 1 | 85.77 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167672 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54104 | City of Boulder | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.5 | Provide information on GHG emissions from the transport sector. | 2 | Inventory year (numerical year) | 6 | Freight transport | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 167673 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 37241 | City of Berkeley | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.4 | Please list the stakeholder engagement activities for each relevant stakeholder group. | 1 | Name of the stakeholder group | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167674 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58591 | City of Greenbelt, MD | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 27 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > CHP generation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167675 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58483 | City of Surrey | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 7 | Comment | 3 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 167676 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 61790 | City of Emeryville, CA | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 2 | Average concentration for most recent year available (ug/m3) | 2 | PM2.5 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167677 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35877 | City of Pittsburgh | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply | 14.2b | Please explain why you do not consider your city to be exposed to any substantive water-related risk. | 2 | Please explain | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 167678 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50540 | City of Albuquerque | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.0a | Please provide details of your renewable energy or electricity target(s) and how the city plans to meet those targets. | 7 | Target year | 1 | 2030 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 167679 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49327 | City of Providence | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.5a | Please provide details on your city’s energy efficiency targets. | 2 | Energy efficiency type covered by target | 5 | Reduce total energy consumed (in MWh) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 167680 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54026 | City of Tacoma | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.4 | Please list the stakeholder engagement activities for each relevant stakeholder group. | 4 | Aim of the engagement activities | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167681 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31182 | City of San Francisco | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 13 | Capacity building and training activities | Exact project funding/costs data is unavailable at this time. A few of the listed emission reduction programs/activities do not have estimated emissions reduction targets, due to the fact that they have not been calculated before for the specific action only and are a part of a larger action strategy with estimated emissions reduction, but ratio emissions reduction targets are unknown. However, all programs listed below are expected to yield emission reductions, regardless of the project timescale. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 167682 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59545 | City of Charlottesville, VA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0b | Please provide details of your total fixed level target(s). | 3 | Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | 4 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167683 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 10495 | City of Las Vegas | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 21 | Policy and regulation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167684 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54078 | City of Hayward | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 19 | Name of the engagement activities | 10 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167685 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.4 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 3 | Number of municipal fleet (excluding buses) | 4 | Plug in hybrid | Notes: 1. The data in the table are observed data extracted from the summary of decoded 2016 vehicle registration data.2. Government vehicles except for buses were added to the passenger car or passenger truck during VIN decoding and decoded, thus it is impossible to separate the government vehicles. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167686 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 14344 | City of Park City, UT | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 4 | Financial mechanism | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167687 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43912 | City of Edmonton | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 3 | Action title | 15 | The City of Edmonton identifies and assesses opportunities to increase the resilience of Edmonton's energy systems | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167688 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31177 | Salt Lake City | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.9 | How many public access EV charging points do you have in your city and/or metropolitan area for the following types. | 3 | Comment | 4 | All types | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167689 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59644 | City of Culver City, CA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 29 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > Local renewable generation | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 167690 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35862 | City of Detroit | United States of America | North America | Food | 12.0a | Report the tonnes per food group that are served and/or sold through programs managed by your city (this includes schools, canteens, hospitals etc.). | 1 | Tonnes served and/or sold | 7 | Added fats | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167691 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54092 | City of Ann Arbor | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 11 | Total cost of the project (currency) | 6 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 167692 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58485 | Abington Township | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 1 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 17 | TOTAL BASIC+ emissions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 167693 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50549 | City of Fort Worth | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 7 | Where can the data be accessed? | 7 | SO2 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167694 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50555 | City of Hamilton | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 8 | Action description and implementation progress | 12 | Public Health Services responsible for monitoring and responding to water born diseases. Regular testing of water from wells, treatment plant and beach inspections are performed annually. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167695 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73666 | Cuyahoga County | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 6 | Base year emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 2 | 26918798 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167696 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31182 | City of San Francisco | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.5 | List any mitigation, adaptation, water related or resilience projects you have planned within your city for which you hope to attract financing and provide details on the estimated costs and status of the project. If your city does not have any relevant projects, please select 'No relevant projects' under 'Project Area'. | 2 | Project title | 14 | Electric Shuttle Buses and Electric Vehicle Charger Installation at SFO | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167697 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74488 | City of Beverly, MA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 5 | Explanation of boundary choice where the assessment boundary differs from the city boundary | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 167698 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49327 | City of Providence | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 8 | Areas/sectors covered by the risk and vulnerability assessment | 1 | Transport | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167699 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.5b | Please explain why you do not have an energy efficiency target and any plans to introduce one in the future. | 2 | Comment | 1 | Please explain | Metropolitan Washington spans across the District of Columbia (DC), Maryland (MD) and Virginia (VA). Nine energy utilities serving Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments’ (COG) 24 local jurisdictions. COG does not have authority over local, state, or utility goals and actions; however, COG does advocate for and support implementation of these policies and programs. DC and MD are part of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), which is a regional cap on CO2 that can be emitted by power plants. This is achieved through the issuance of tradable CO2 allowances. VA will join on Jan. 1, 2021. DC, MD and VA have adopted buildings codes that drive greater energy efficiency in the built environment. MD has adopted 2018 International Energy Conservation Codes (IECC) and the DC and VA have adopted IECC 2015. DC and MD have also adopted the International Green Construction Code (IgCC), versions 2012 and 2018, respectively.Each state has passed energy efficiency legislation. The District’s Clean and Affordable Energy Act of 2008 established the DC Sustainable Energy Utility (SEU) to administer sustainable energy programs with certain targets they needed to meet. DC's 2018 CleanEnergy Act further expanded DCSEU’s role. The EmPOWER MD Energy Efficiency Act of 2008 established a goal to reduce per capita electricity usage and peak demand 15 percent by 2015 and requires utilities to establish efficiency programs. Also, electric utilities are required to achieve annual incremental cost-effective energy savings equal to 2% of their retail electric sales. VA's Grid Transformation and Security Act of 2018 requires Dominion Energy to develop energy conservation measures, investing at least $870 million. The Metropolitan Washington 2030 Climate and Energy Action Plan addresses the climate mitigation goal of reducing emissions 50% by 2030. The plan does not set any sub-goals or sector specific targets; however, the 2030 technical potential scenarios and mitigation actions do identify the level of implementation needed to meet the 2030 goal to reduce emissions 50% by 2030. To meet the 50% by 2030 goal, all new construction will need to be net zero energy by 2030, there will need to be deep energy retrofits of existing residential and commercial buildings at an annual rate of 2 percent, and 2/3rds of refrigerant emissions will need to be reduced. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 167700 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59642 | City of Dublin, CA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 9 | Please explain | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
