Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 177751 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35859 | City of Cleveland | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 5 | Emissions occurring outside the city boundary as a result of in-city activities (metric tonnes CO2e) | 10 | Transportation > Waterborne navigation | 202657 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 177752 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49327 | City of Providence | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 9 | Future change in intensity | 8 | Increasing | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177753 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74558 | Summit County, UT | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 11 | When do you first expect to experience those changes in frequency and intensity? | 3 | Immediately | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177754 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50540 | City of Albuquerque | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 14 | Web link | 4 | https://www.cabq.gov/environmentalhealth/urban-biology/mosquitoes/aedes-aegypti-the-yellow-fever-mosquito | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177755 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43907 | City of Indianapolis | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 10 | Completeness of data (%) | 5 | NO2 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177756 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50560 | City of Oakland | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 13 | Description of the stakeholder engagement processes | 1 | To achieve a more trustworthy and responsive government, Oakland empowers our “entrepreneurial bureaucrats” to think outside the box while collaborating closely with community stakeholders. The City of Oakland boasts a passionate and mission-driven staff. Resilient Oakland engaged staff from nearly all City departments, led by a team of doers and innovators, to address interdisciplinary issues.The City will set up “Resilience Delivery Teams,” internal working groups that will ensure coordination and accountability in resilience strategy refinement and implementing innovative solutions. These teams will be interdepartmental, with members from relevant agencies, and can include community stakeholders. Resilience Delivery Teams will be responsible for direct implementation, working with senior staff, City units, and departments, but will remain outside the regular organizational hierarchy. These teams will be uniquely positioned to coordinate across departments and functions, leveraging City talent and commitment to achieve concrete results. The City of Oakland will participate in regional resilience partnerships with organizations including the Bay Area Regional Collective (BARC), Coastal Hazards Adaptation Resiliency Group (CHARG), and SuperPublic. BARC, with support from a Caltrans Regional Planning Grant, will coordinate planning efforts to ensure the Bay Area transportation system is more resilient to increased flooding and sea level rise, while also improving the safety and sustainability of our communities, particularly our most vulnerable and disadvantaged communities. The City will also participate in regional pilots and programs. For example, the City of Oakland serves on the executive board of the Bay Area Resilient by Design challenge, a unique nine-county pilot to co-create a vision for vibrant climate adaptation along our shoreline as the rate of sea level rise, extreme storms, and urban flooding accelerates. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177757 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74466 | Village of South Barrington, IL | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.3a | Please provide details on the use of transferable emissions. | 2 | Emissions saved (metric tonnes CO2e) | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177758 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54110 | City of Santa Monica | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 11 | When do you first expect to experience those changes in frequency and intensity? | 5 | Medium-term (2026-2050) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177759 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43910 | City of Columbus | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 6 | Elderly | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177760 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63919 | City of Saratoga Springs, NY | United States of America | North America | Introduction | 0.1 | Please give a general description and introduction to your city including your city’s reporting boundary in the table below. | 1 | Administrative boundary | 1 | Please complete | City / Municipality | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177761 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 3417 | New York City | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 5 | Does this goal align with a requirement from a higher level of government? | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 177762 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63862 | City of Ashland, OR | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply | 14.2a | Please identify the risks to your city’s water security as well as the timescale and level of risk. | 4 | Estimated probability of impact | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177763 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58483 | City of Surrey | Canada | North America | Waste | 13.6 | Does your city have any of the following initiatives, policies and/or regulations. | 2 | Please provide more details and/or a link to more information about any of the proposed initiatives/policies/regulations | 1 | Bans or restrictions on single use or non-recyclable materials | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177764 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 55801 | City of West Palm Beach | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 2 | Category | 68 | Direct emissions | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177765 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 61790 | City of Emeryville, CA | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.3 | Please give the name of the primary protocol, standard, or methodology used to calculate your local government operations emissions inventory and attach your inventory using the attachment function. | 2 | Comment | 1 | Emissions methodology | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 177766 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58310 | City of Roanoke | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.6 | Please provide total (Scope 1 + Scope 2) GHG emissions for your local government operations, in metric tonnes CO2e. | 1 | Total Scope 1 + Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 1 | Local government emissions breakdown | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 177767 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74575 | Dane County | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 5 | Social impact of hazard overall | 2 | Increased risk to already vulnerable populations | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177768 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53959 | City of Fayetteville, AR | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 2 | Did this hazard significantly impact your city before 2020? | 7 | No | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177769 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35883 | City of San José | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 3 | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling (metric tonnes CO2e) | 11 | Transportation > Aviation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177770 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54108 | City of Durham | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 2 | Where sources differ from the inventory, identify and explain these additions / exclusions | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177771 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54124 | City of Fremont | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 12 | Total cost of the project | 9 | 245000 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177772 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50545 | City of Henderson | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 7 | Please explain any excluded sources, identify any emissions covered under an ETS and provide any other comments | 1 | Stationary energy > Residential buildings | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 177773 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848567 | Mid-America Regional Council | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0b | Please provide details of your total fixed level target(s). | 9 | Does this target align with the global 1.5 -2 °C pathway set out in the Paris agreement? | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177774 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49342 | City of Rochester | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 20 | Aim of the engagement activities | 3 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177775 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35268 | City of Boston | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 4 | Emergency services | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177776 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63601 | Township of Maplewood, NJ | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 5 | Means of implementation | 2 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 177777 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74558 | Summit County, UT | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.5a | Please provide details on your city’s energy efficiency targets. | 5 | Target year | 1 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 177778 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 20113 | City of Vancouver | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 6 | Stakeholder engagement | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177779 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43910 | City of Columbus | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 6 | Energy savings (MWh) | 12 | 16127.22 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177780 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 13067 | City of New Orleans | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.4 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 2 | Number of buses | 5 | Hydrogen | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 177781 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54088 | City of Peterborough | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 18 | Role in the GCC program | 4 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177782 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54075 | City of Lakewood | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 3 | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling (metric tonnes CO2e) | 31 | Total Emissions (excluding generation of grid-supplied energy) | 653793.8 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 177783 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 834083 | City of Eau Claire, WI | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 2 | Did this hazard significantly impact your city before 2020? | 2 | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177784 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63862 | City of Ashland, OR | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 8 | Action description and implementation progress | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 177785 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43908 | City of Milwaukee | United States of America | North America | Food | 12.4 | How does your city increase access to sustainable foods? | 1 | Action implemented | 1 | Do you subsidise fresh fruits and vegetables? | No | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177786 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50544 | City of Aurora, IL | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 30 | Total Generation of grid-supplied energy | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 177787 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50541 | City of Greensboro | United States of America | North America | Waste | 13.0 | What is the annual solid waste generation in your city? | 3 | Please describe the methodology used to calculate the annual solid waste generation in your city | 1 | Please complete | Based on cumulative weight of truckloads delivered to solid waste transfer station, for subsequent transport to landfill. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177788 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54124 | City of Fremont | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0c | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year intensity target. An intensity target is usually measured per capita or per unit GDP. If you have an absolute emissions reduction target, please select “Base year emissions (absolute) target” in question 5.0. | 1 | Sector | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177789 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49334 | City of Richmond, VA | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.12 | Does your city have its own credit rating? | 3 | Rating | 1 | International | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 177790 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50540 | City of Albuquerque | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.8 | Do you have a loading / unloading Restricted Zone for Logistics? If yes, please provide more detail about the Restricted zone. | 3 | Please provide more detail about the Restricted zone | 1 | Please complete | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 177791 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59572 | District of Saanich, BC | Canada | North America | Opportunities | Climate Action Planning | 6.15 | How many people within your city are employed in green jobs/industries? | 4 | Comment | 1 | Green jobs/industries | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 177792 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 14344 | City of Park City, UT | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 8 | Timescale of reduction / savings / energy production | 19 | Per year | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177793 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 832838 | Town of Wellfleet | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 5 | Number of monitoring stations | 3 | PM10 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177794 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43910 | City of Columbus | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 5 | Social inclusion, social justice | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177795 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58668 | City of New Bedford, MA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 13 | Total Transport | 250200 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 177796 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50540 | City of Albuquerque | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.4 | How much (in MW capacity) renewable energy is installed within the city boundary in the following categories? | 2 | Comment | 5 | Wind | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 177797 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35860 | City of Dallas | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Climate Action Planning | 6.14 | How do the city's environment/sustainability and economic development departments work together, for instance, in planning climate actions? | 7 | If they do not work together, please explain why | 1 | Working togehter | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 177798 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74546 | City of Milwaukie, OR | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0d | Does your city have an update/revision process for the climate risk and vulnerability assessment? | 2 | Provide more details on the update / revision process for your climate risk or vulnerability assessment | 1 | Update/revision process | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 177799 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 20113 | City of Vancouver | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 6 | Low-income households | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 177800 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 37241 | City of Berkeley | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 12 | Please describe the target and the modelling methodology(ies) and parameters used to define it | 1 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
