Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 181101 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54124 | City of Fremont | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 10 | Completeness of data (%) | 1 | PM2.5 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181102 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49342 | City of Rochester | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.5 | Provide information on GHG emissions from the transport sector. | 2 | Inventory year (numerical year) | 3 | Passenger Transport: Public Transport (LRT/MRT/Railway) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181103 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35393 | City of St Louis | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 16 | Target meets initial GCoM validation criteria | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181104 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.8 | Please indicate if your local government operations emissions have increased, decreased, or stayed the same since your last emissions inventory, and please describe why. | 2 | Primary reason for change | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 181105 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54098 | City of Thunder Bay | Canada | North America | Submit your response | Response Language | What language are you submitting your response in? | 0 | 0 | English | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||||
| 181106 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35857 | City of Cincinnati | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 19 | Name of the engagement activities | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 181107 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 4 | Enhanced resilience | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181108 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74423 | City of Key West, FL | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.0a | Please detail which goals and targets are incorporated in your city’s master plan and describe how these goals are addressed in the table below. | 1 | Goal type | 1 | Energy efficiency targets | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181109 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50559 | City of St Catharines, ON | Canada | North America | Water Security | Water Supply Management | 14.4 | Does your city have a publicly available Water Resource Management strategy? | 0 | 0 | Intending to undertake in next 2 years | The City will be undertaking a Storm Water Management Master Plan within the next two years. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181110 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50558 | City of London, ON | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 7 | Environment, biodiversity, forestry | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181111 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54111 | City of Iowa City | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 5 | Estimated emissions reduction (metric tonnes CO2e) | 3 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 181112 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74418 | Town of Breckenridge, CO | United States of America | North America | Food | 12.4 | How does your city increase access to sustainable foods? | 1 | Action implemented | 4 | Do you incentivise fresh fruit/vegetables vendor locations? | No | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181113 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50578 | City of Windsor | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 76 | Improved access to data for informed decision-making | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181114 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58513 | City of Medford | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 3 | Average concentration for second most recent year available (ug/m3) | 2 | PM2.5 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181115 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73666 | Cuyahoga County | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 4 | Stationary energy > Industrial buildings & facilities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181116 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43910 | City of Columbus | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 3 | Fuel type or activity | 26 | Diesel oil | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181117 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59572 | District of Saanich, BC | Canada | North America | Water Security | Water Supply | 14.1 | What percentage of your city's population has access to potable water supply service? | 0 | 0 | 100 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 181118 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 2 | Category | 35 | Direct emissions | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181119 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 13067 | City of New Orleans | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 5 | Emissions occurring outside the city boundary as a result of in-city activities (metric tonnes CO2e) | 1 | Stationary energy > Residential buildings | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181120 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43909 | City of Orlando | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.3 | What are the total number of journeys made in your city each year by each mode below? | 1 | Number of journeys made each year | 7 | Taxis or For Hire Vehicles | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181121 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73666 | Cuyahoga County | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.6 | How many city staff (FTE) work on topics related to climate change mitigation and adaptation? | 3 | Comment | 1 | Please complete | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 181122 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59563 | City of Takoma Park, MD | United States of America | North America | Introduction | 0.1 | Please give a general description and introduction to your city including your city’s reporting boundary in the table below. | 2 | Description of city | 1 | Please complete | Takoma Park is a city in Montgomery County, Maryland. It is a suburb of Washington, D.C., and part of the Washington metropolitan area. Founded in 1883 and incorporated in 1890, Takoma Park, informally called "Azalea City," is a Tree City USA and a nuclear-free zone. A planned commuter suburb, it is situated along the Metropolitan Branch of the historic Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, just northeast of Washington, D.C., and it borders the neighborhood of Takoma, Washington, D.C. It is governed by an elected mayor and six elected council members, who form the city council, and an appointed city manager, under a council-manager style of government. The city's population was 16,715 at the 2010 national census. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181123 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49342 | City of Rochester | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 1 | Climate Hazards | 4 | Extreme Precipitation > Rain storm | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181124 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74453 | City of Highland Park, IL | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 1 | Climate Hazards | 9 | Extreme cold temperature > Cold wave | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181125 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59537 | City of Denton, TX | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6e | Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your city-wide emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by the US Community Protocol sources. | 2 | Sector | 7 | Commercial buildings | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181126 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49339 | City and County of Honolulu | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 2 | Average concentration for most recent year available (ug/m3) | 1 | PM2.5 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181127 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54119 | City of Palo Alto | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.0a | Please provide details of your renewable energy or electricity target(s) and how the city plans to meet those targets. | 6 | Percentage renewable energy / electricity of total energy or electricity in base year | 1 | 22 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 181128 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54113 | City of Flagstaff | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 2 | Web link | 2 | https://www.flagstaff.az.gov/DocumentCenter/View/59411/Flagstaff-Climate-Action-and-Adaptation-Plan_Nov-2018 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181129 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 840269 | Town of Whitby, ON | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 5 | Means of implementation | 3 | Stakeholder engagement | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181130 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58513 | City of Medford | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 3 | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling (metric tonnes CO2e) | 13 | Total Transport | 2097 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 181131 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54026 | City of Tacoma | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.4 | What is the total final annual energy use for buildings within your city boundary (aggregated across all fuel types)? (*in USA 'total final energy use' is known as 'site energy use')? | 1 | Total final energy use (kWh/annum) | 5 | New buildings | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181132 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50568 | City of Saskatoon | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 1 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 181133 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74558 | Summit County, UT | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6c | Please provide a breakdown of your GHG emissions by scope. Where values are not available, please use the comment field to indicate the reason why. | 8 | Total Scope 2 emissions | 1 | City-wide emissions | 439966 | The inventory was completed by an independent contracting firm and results were integrated into a county Climate Action Plan, in which they did not break down the emissions into scopes. We only emissions by sector and source. In 2020 a new inventory will be undertaken, and it will include emissions by scopes, sector, source, etc. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |
| 181134 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53921 | City of Tempe, AZ | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 4 | Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181135 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50571 | City of Victoria | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 4 | Status of action | 8 | Implementation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181136 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35879 | City of Minneapolis | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Planning | 5.5a | Please attach your city’s climate change mitigation plan below. If your city has both mitigation and energy access plans, please make sure to attach all relevant documents below. | 11 | Description of the stakeholder engagement process | 1 | City staff initiated the development process in early 2012 with the formation of three technical working groups and a steering committee, each made up of City and other government agency representatives, technical experts, community representatives, and members of the City’s Community Environmental Advisory Commission (CEAC). A project kickoff meeting in February 2012 attracted over 100 attendees.Between March and August 2012, the three technical working groups met five times each, focusing on three key emissions areas: buildings and energy, transportation and land use, and waste and recycling. The groups reviewed Minneapolis’ greenhouse gas emissions in each sector, developed strategies to reduce those emissions, and ultimately forwarded a set of draft emissions reduction goals and strategies to the Steering Committee.An Environmental Justice Working Group (EJWG) was established in August 2012 - the intent of this effort was to ensure that the voices of those most impacted by both climate change (namely communities of color, American Indians, and low-income communities) were represented and supported within a decision-making capacity in the planning process. The EJWG reviewed the technical working groups’ proposed goals and strategies, and after meeting five times from September 2012 to January 2013, submitted comments, strategy proposals, and additional recommendations to the Steering Committee in February 2013.Staff solicited public input on the technical working groups’ draft emissions reduction goals and strategies in November and December of 2012. Two public open houses attracted over 50 attendees and an online survey garnered 65 additional responses. Project staff also presented the draft goals and strategies to five of the City’s advisory groups. Each group adopted and submitted resolutions supporting the Plan and offering comments and priorities.The Steering Committee met five times between September 2012 and April 2013, reviewing the four working groups’ recommendations, public input and feedback, as well as comments from City advisory groups and other interested organizations. All Steering Committee meetings were open to the public, and Working Group members attended and gave feedback. Steering Committee meeting information was communicated directly to committee members and via the project website, which also included meeting materials. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181137 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31181 | City of Philadelphia | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply Management | 14.4b | Please explain why your city does not have a public Water Resource Management strategy. | 2 | Please explain | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 181138 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54037 | City of Des Moines | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.1 | Does your city have emissions reduction targets or energy efficiency targets for the following building types? | 1 | Emissions reduction target | 1 | Commercial | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181139 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35475 | City of Calgary | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Planning | 5.5a | Please attach your city’s climate change mitigation plan below. If your city has both mitigation and energy access plans, please make sure to attach all relevant documents below. | 5 | Areas covered by action plan | 2 | Spatial Planning | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181140 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 36410 | City of Memphis | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 8 | Target year | 1 | 2020 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181141 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54098 | City of Thunder Bay | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 20 | Aim of the engagement activities | 4 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181142 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43910 | City of Columbus | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 18 | Role in the GCC program | 7 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181143 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.8 | Please indicate if your local government operations emissions have increased, decreased, or stayed the same since your last emissions inventory, and please describe why. | 1 | Change in emissions | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 181144 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50571 | City of Victoria | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 7 | Land use planning | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181145 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50566 | City of Anchorage | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 6 | Infrastructure development | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181146 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 20113 | City of Vancouver | Canada | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 13 | Total cost provided by the majority funding source (currency) | 10 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 181147 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73530 | Town of Lexington, MA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | Re-stating previous emissions inventories | 4.14a | Please provide your city’s recalculated total city-wide emissions figures for any previous inventories along with Scope 1, 2 and 3 breakdowns where applicable. | 2 | Inventory date to | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181148 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31182 | City of San Francisco | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 2 | Average concentration for most recent year available (ug/m3) | 6 | O3 (Daily maximum 8 hour mean) | 146 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181149 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50560 | City of Oakland | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 10 | Completeness of data (%) | 2 | PM2.5 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 181150 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50558 | City of London, ON | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 8 | Future change in frequency | 2 | Increasing | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
