Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2020 - Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 185601 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74508 | City of Winona, MN | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide external verification | 4.11 | Does your city have a strategy, or other policy document, in place for how to measure and reduce consumption-based GHG emissions in your city? | 2 | Please provide more details on and/or a link to the strategy | 6 | Aviation | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185602 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43912 | City of Edmonton | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 8 | Future change in frequency | 2 | Increasing | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185603 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35859 | City of Cleveland | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 4 | Implementation status | 2 | Operation | For all emission reduction activities, the anticipated emissions reductions are for annual emission reductions in the year 2030. These are not cumulative emission reductions up to 2030. In 2019-2020, the City will be developing a pathway to 100% renewable by 2050, which will provide more detailed reduction estimates out to 2050.Assumptions:1) An assumptions of constant energy demand from 2017 through 2030 is made for energy efficiency calculations. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185604 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74401 | City of Encinitas, CA | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 6 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 185605 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 834083 | City of Eau Claire, WI | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 11 | Transportation > Aviation | N/A | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185606 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74418 | Town of Breckenridge, CO | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Climate Action Planning | 6.16 | Does your city report to the national Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system (if in place)? | 2 | Comment | 1 | MRV system | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185607 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 834373 | Town of York, ME | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.5 | Is your city implementing any retrofit programs addressing existing commercial, residential and/or municipal buildings? | 1 | Response | 1 | Retrofit programs | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185608 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74594 | City of Boynton Beach | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 16 | Web link to action website | 6 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 185609 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 37241 | City of Berkeley | United States of America | North America | Energy | 8.1 | Please indicate the source mix of electricity consumed in your city. | 11 | Total - please ensure this equals 100% | 1 | Electricity source | 100 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185610 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 53829 | City of Kingston, ON | Canada | North America | Water Security | Water Supply Management | 14.4a | Please provide more information on your city’s public Water Resource Management strategy. | 3 | Web link | 0 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 185611 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35883 | City of San José | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 7 | Emission factor unit (numerator) | 19 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 185612 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73666 | Cuyahoga County | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 17 | Name of the stakeholder group | 5 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185613 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58531 | City of Somerville, MA | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.3 | What are the total number of journeys made in your city each year by each mode below? | 1 | Number of journeys made each year | 2 | Rail / Metro / Tram | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185614 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50559 | City of St Catharines, ON | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 3 | Stationary energy > Institutional buildings & facilities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185615 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49334 | City of Richmond, VA | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply | 14.2a | Please identify the risks to your city’s water security as well as the timescale and level of risk. | 1 | Water security risk drivers | 1 | Inadequate or ageing water supply infrastructure | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185616 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73301 | City of Gretna, LA | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 6 | Environment, biodiversity, forestry | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185617 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74463 | Village of Park Forest, IL | United States of America | North America | Water Security | Water Supply | 14.2b | Please explain why you do not consider your city to be exposed to any substantive water-related risk. | 2 | Please explain | 1 | Please explain | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185618 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31108 | City of Houston | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Climate Action Planning | 6.15 | How many people within your city are employed in green jobs/industries? | 1 | Number of people in your city employed in green jobs and/or industries | 1 | Green jobs/industries | 39986 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185619 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 14344 | City of Park City, UT | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 5 | Emissions occurring outside the city boundary as a result of in-city activities (metric tonnes CO2e) | 6 | Stationary energy > Fugitive emissions | 0 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185620 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 3 | Means of implementation | 37 | Policy and regulation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185621 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 23 | AFOLU > Land use | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185622 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54100 | City of Columbia, MO | United States of America | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.5 | List any mitigation, adaptation, water related or resilience projects you have planned within your city for which you hope to attract financing and provide details on the estimated costs and status of the project. If your city does not have any relevant projects, please select 'No relevant projects' under 'Project Area'. | 6 | Identified financing model description | 1 | Capitol Improvement Fund, grants, and possible investors | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185623 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 834373 | Town of York, ME | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6e | Where it will facilitate a greater understanding of your city-wide emissions, please provide a breakdown of these emissions by the US Community Protocol sources. | 2 | Sector | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185624 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50545 | City of Henderson | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 4 | Water supply & sanitation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185625 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 14874 | City of Portland, OR | United States of America | North America | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.0a | Please detail which goals and targets are incorporated in your city’s master plan and describe how these goals are addressed in the table below. | 1 | Goal type | 5 | Waste management targets | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185626 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63999 | City of Miami Beach, FL | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.3 | Does your city-wide emissions reduction target(s) account for the use of transferable emissions units? | 0 | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 185627 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50540 | City of Albuquerque | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.9 | How many public access EV charging points do you have in your city and/or metropolitan area for the following types. | 1 | Number of charging points | 3 | Slow 3kw or below | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185628 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 52897 | City of Aspen | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 1 | Emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 11 | Industrial Processes and Product Use – Scope 1 (IV) | 0 | There is a discrepancy in the emissions value of the solid waste figure in our 2017 inventory and the GPC report that is exported from Clearpath. The values listed in the answer for 4.6b are consistent with those in the inventory document and spreadsheet but not the GPC report. The suspected cause of this discrepancy is the emissions factor for methane that is used in Clearpath and how emissions are calculated, resulting in the slight difference relative to our inventory. Since it is automatically calculated in Clearpath, that figure cannot be altered for the GPC exported report at this time, but it is attached for transparency. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |
| 185629 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35857 | City of Cincinnati | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 12 | Transportation > Off-road | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185630 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 63762 | Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 1 | Applicable sub-sector | 16 | CRF -Stationary energy > Commercial buildings & facilities | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185631 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 52897 | City of Aspen | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 12 | Transportation > Off-road | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185632 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59538 | City of Mississauga | Canada | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Emissions Verification | 7.9a | Please provide the following information about the emissions verification process. | 2 | Year of verification | 1 | Verification details | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185633 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35475 | City of Calgary | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 11 | Transport | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185634 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59572 | District of Saanich, BC | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 6 | Most relevant assets / services affected overall | 4 | Land use planning | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185635 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35274 | City of Portland, ME | United States of America | North America | Buildings | 9.4 | What is the total final annual energy use for buildings within your city boundary (aggregated across all fuel types)? (*in USA 'total final energy use' is known as 'site energy use')? | 1 | Total final energy use (kWh/annum) | 4 | Residential | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185636 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59631 | City of San Leandro, CA | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 2 | Where data is not available, please explain why | 7 | Transportation – Scope 3 (II.X.3) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185637 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49342 | City of Rochester | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 7 | Renewable energy production (MWh) | 1 | 0 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185638 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59562 | City of Urbana, IL | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 2 | Did this hazard significantly impact your city before 2020? | 10 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 185639 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73666 | Cuyahoga County | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.13 | How many instances of exceeding your city’s Air Quality Index standards for the Air Quality Index (AQI) has your city experienced ? | 1 | Number of days exceeding your city’s Air Quality Index standards | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 185640 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35894 | Ville de Montreal | Canada | North America | Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.5 | List any mitigation, adaptation, water related or resilience projects you have planned within your city for which you hope to attract financing and provide details on the estimated costs and status of the project. If your city does not have any relevant projects, please select 'No relevant projects' under 'Project Area'. | 7 | Project description and attach project proposal | 1 | Réseau express métropolitain (REM): A new integrated network linking downtown Montreal, South Shore, West Island, North Shore and the airport. Once completed, the REM will be the fourth largest automated transportation system in the world after Singapore (82), Dubai (80 km) and Vancouver (68 km). For the metropolitan area, the REM also represents the largest public transportation infrastructure since the Montréal metro, inaugurated in 1966. Combined with existing transportation networks (metro, trains and buses), the REM opens a new era of public transit development in the Greater Montréal area. The solution proposed by CDPQ Infra will:• offer an integrated, efficient and reliable service• constitute Québec’s first “public-"public"” partnership project• build a new network of strategic importance for the Montreal metropolitan area and for Québec• foster environmentally sustainable transportationp.12: http://www.budget.finances.gouv.qc.ca/budget/2017-2018/fr/documents/Budget1718_TransportCollectif.pdf | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185641 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54048 | City of Knoxville | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6c | Please provide a breakdown of your GHG emissions by scope. Where values are not available, please use the comment field to indicate the reason why. | 3 | Scope 1 emissions from grid-supplied energy generation within the city boundary | 1 | City-wide emissions | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185642 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50566 | City of Anchorage | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 6 | If you have no emissions occurring outside the city boundary to report as a result of in-city activities, please select a notation key to explain why | 2 | Stationary energy > Commercial buildings & facilities | Not Estimated | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185643 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59545 | City of Charlottesville, VA | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 6 | Co-benefit area | 1 | Job creation | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185644 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 10495 | City of Las Vegas | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 5 | Social impact of hazard overall | 5 | Increased demand for healthcare services | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185645 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54037 | City of Des Moines | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 1 | Climate Hazards | 1 | Flood and sea level rise > Flash / surface flood | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185646 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31117 | City of Toronto | Canada | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 3 | Fuel type or activity | 7 | Natural gas | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185647 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59631 | City of San Leandro, CA | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.6 | How many buses has your city procured in the last year? | 2 | Comment | 7 | Diesel | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185648 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49333 | City of Louisville, KY | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 1 | Publication title and attach the document | 1 | Climate Change Vulnerability in Louisville, Kentucky | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 185649 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 59562 | City of Urbana, IL | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide external verification | 4.11 | Does your city have a strategy, or other policy document, in place for how to measure and reduce consumption-based GHG emissions in your city? | 2 | Please provide more details on and/or a link to the strategy | 5 | Electronics | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 185650 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49335 | Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County | United States of America | North America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 16 | Web link to action website | 3 | http://www.nashville.gov/Portals/0/SiteContent/pw/docs/transportation/WalknBike/WalknBikeFinalPlan.pdf | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
This view contains data from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 86
- Downloads
- 15
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
