Go back to the interactive dataset
2020 - Full Cities Dataset
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 147751 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 32480 | City of Adelaide | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 9 | Co-benefit area | 7 | Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147752 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49334 | City of Richmond, VA | United States of America | North America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 4 | Average concentration for third most recent year available (ug/m3) | 2 | PM2.5 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147753 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54498 | Ayuntamiento de Murcia | Spain | Europe | Adaptation | Adaptation Planning Process | 3.4 | Does your local/regional government apply a Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system for monitoring the implementation of adaptation goals and targets as part of the climate adaptation plan (or integrated climate action plan)? | 1 | Response | 1 | Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) system | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147754 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 37241 | City of Berkeley | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 7 | Comment | 4 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 147755 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31169 | Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region | China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region | East Asia | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 10 | Scope and impact of action | 9 | To implement the Integrated Waste Management Facilities (IWMF) Phase 1 through a Design-Build-Operate contract. Upon commissioning in 2025 IWMF Phase 1 could treat 3000 tonnes of municipal solid wastes every day by advanced moving grate incinerators. Through recovering the heat generated from the incineration, it would generate 480,000 MWh of electricity and reduce 440,000 tonnes of CO2 emission each year. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147756 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58569 | City of Podgorica | Montenegro | Europe | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 6 | Marginalized groups | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147757 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73701 | San Carlos Sud | Argentina | Latin America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 7 | Sectors/areas adaptation action applies to | 8 | Transport (Mobility) | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147758 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 832002 | Municipalidad de Quepos | Costa Rica | Latin America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.4 | Which gases are included in your city-wide emissions inventory? | 0 | 0 | N20 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 147759 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 10495 | City of Las Vegas | United States of America | North America | Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 2 | Action | 20 | Hazard resistant infrastructure design and construction | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147760 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 73701 | San Carlos Sud | Argentina | Latin America | Food | 12.0a | Report the tonnes per food group that are served and/or sold through programs managed by your city (this includes schools, canteens, hospitals etc.). | 1 | Tonnes served and/or sold | 1 | Vegetables | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147761 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 13506 | Nottingham City Council | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Europe | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 2 | Where data is not available, please explain why | 6 | Transportation – Scope 2 (II.X.2) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147762 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50359 | Gobierno Municipal de León de los Aldamas | Mexico | Latin America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 13 | Total cost provided by the local government | 27 | 0 | La información que se muestra en 0 de costos o ahorro energético, consumos o producción no se cuenta con ellos. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147763 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 49339 | City and County of Honolulu | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 27 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > CHP generation | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147764 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 845316 | Villa de Soto | Argentina | Latin America | Food | 12.0a | Report the tonnes per food group that are served and/or sold through programs managed by your city (this includes schools, canteens, hospitals etc.). | 2 | Comment | 4 | Whole grains | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147765 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 36501 | Comune di Prato | Italy | Europe | City-wide Emissions | City-wide external verification | 4.12a | Please provide the following information about the city-wide emissions verification. | 2 | Year of verification | 1 | Please complete | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147766 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 845308 | Puerto Cortés | Honduras | Latin America | Buildings | 9.4 | What is the total final annual energy use for buildings within your city boundary (aggregated across all fuel types)? (*in USA 'total final energy use' is known as 'site energy use')? | 1 | Total final energy use (kWh/annum) | 4 | Residential | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147767 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 849121 | Junín | Argentina | Latin America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 3 | Average concentration for second most recent year available (ug/m3) | 5 | NO2 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147768 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31056 | Edinburgh City Council | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Europe | Energy | 8.4 | How much (in MW capacity) renewable energy is installed within the city boundary in the following categories? | 2 | Comment | 3 | Solar thermal | This figure corresponds to the Royal Commonwealth Pool only. The solar roof has a surface of 800 m2. Assuming a conversion factor of 0.7 kWhth/m2, we get an estimated capacity of 0.56 MWth.Sources :http://www.retrofitscotland.org/media/24404/retrofit-case-study-commonwealth-pool.pdf https://www.iea-shc.org/Data/Sites/1/documents/statistics/Technical_Note-New_Solar_Thermal_Statistics_Conversion.pdf | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147769 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848476 | Municipalidad de Cañas | Costa Rica | Latin America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.3a | Please report on how climate change impacts health outcomes and health services in your city. | 4 | Identify the climate-related health issues faced by your city | 1 | Food & Nutrition Security | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147770 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54114 | City of Asheville | United States of America | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment | 2.0b | Please attach and provide details on your climate change risk and vulnerability assessment. Please provide details on the boundary of your assessment, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 5 | Explanation of boundary choice where the assessment boundary differs from the city boundary | 1 | Adjoining areas were considered when analysis focused on regional supply chains that may be impacted. The assessment looks at both municipal and community risks. Additionally census block data was used which crosses city boundaries into the county. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147771 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50650 | City of Gibraltar | Gibraltar | Europe | Transport | 10.5 | Provide information on GHG emissions from the transport sector. | 2 | Inventory year (numerical year) | 5 | Passenger Transport: Taxi/TNC | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147772 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848997 | Villarino | Argentina | Latin America | Transport | 10.14 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 4 | Average concentration for third most recent year available (ug/m3) | 7 | SO2 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147773 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50543 | Halifax Regional Municipality | Canada | North America | Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.5 | Please give the total amount of fuel (refers to Scope 1 emissions) that your local government has consumed this year. | 4 | Units | 2 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147774 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848568 | Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 10 | Comment | 5 | Used for electricity sold from any utility other than Xcel Energy | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147775 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 840244 | Prefeitura de Águas da Prata | Brazil | Latin America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0c | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year intensity target. An intensity target is usually measured per capita or per unit GDP. If you have an absolute emissions reduction target, please select “Base year emissions (absolute) target” in question 5.0. | 4 | Base year | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147776 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848978 | Floresta | Colombia | Latin America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 14 | Majority funding source | 2 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 147777 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50359 | Gobierno Municipal de León de los Aldamas | Mexico | Latin America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 10 | Scope and impact of action | 33 | Objetivo: Conocer mediante la utilización de los sensores de bajo costo la concentración de contaminantes PM 1, PM 2.5 y PM 10 a los que está expuesto la ciudadanía. Participantes: Municipio de León, a través de la Dirección General de Gestión Ambiental., Instituto de Recursos Mundiales de México (WRI)., Universidad de Edimburgo Escocia., Gobierno del estado de Guanajuato a través de la Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Ordenamiento Territorial. Duración: 21 de octubre de 2019 al 02 de diciembre de 2019SENSORES ESTACIONARIOS Y PORTÁTILES DE BAJO COSTO SENSORES PORTÁTILESEstos se emplearon para hacer recorridos peatonales y en bicicleta con personal de la Dirección General de Gestión Ambiental, mismos se realizaron en zona centro y dentro del polígono del Sistema de Bicicleta Compartida, mismos circuitos y polígono.CIRCUITO 1 (caminando). En las siguientes imágenes nos muestra el valor más alto respecto a la calidad del aire durante el recorrido 1, obteniendo un valor de 599.02 μg/m³ de PM 10, así como se puede observar la ruta que se realiza durante el recorrido y la semaforización de la calidad del aire (gráfico 2). CIRCUITO 2 (caminando).Para el caso del recorrido 2, el valor más alto fue de 611.17 μg/m³ de PM 10, tal como se puede observar en el siguiente gráfico. Gráfico 3. Valor máximo de calidad del aire durante el periodo de estudio en la ruta 2.Así como se puede apreciar la ruta que se estableció para el circuito 2 en el siguiente gráfico.CIRCUITO 3 (bicicleta). Para el caso de los recorridos en bicicleta, las dos rutas establecidas se realizaron con el mismo equipo, por lo que se tomó el día más alto en concentración por ruta de recorrido. Para el caso del circuito 3, el valor más alto, se presenta el día 12 de noviembre con un valor de 241.39 μg/m³ de PM 10. Tal como se observa en el siguiente gráfico. Gráfico 5. Valor máximo de calidad del aire durante el periodo de estudio en la ruta 3.La ruta establecida para este recorrido es más extensa que el circuito 4, mismo se puede apreciar en el gráfico que a continuación se presenta.CIRCUITO 4 (bicicleta). Para este circuito, el valor más alto de acuerdo al panel Specknet, se presenta el día 13 de noviembre del 2019, con un valor de 349.56 μg/m³ de PM 10, tal como se observa en el gráfico.El circuito 4, también fue realizó en bicicleta y con el mismo equipo portátil, a diferencia del circuito 3 este es más corto, mismo se puede apreciar, en el siguiente gráfico.ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVOPara tener un panorama más puntual y certero sobre los resultados que nos arrojaron los sensores portátiles, se realizó un comparativo con los niveles establecidos en el programa de contingencias ambientales atmosféricas del municipio de León y el semáforo de la calidad del aire de Gobierno del estado de Guanajuato. En la siguiente tabla podemos observar la comparativa de los resultados obtenidos con la campaña piloto de monitoreo de la calidad del aire, con el programa de contingencias ambientales y el semáforo de la calidad del aire.En los resultados presentados, se pueden observar que sobrepasan los valores establecidos en el programa de contingencias ambientales del municipio y los valores del semáforo de la calidad del aire establecidos por el Gobierno del estado de Guanajuato. SENSORES ESTACIONARIOS Para el caso de los sensores estacionarios, los valores que se obtuvieron en el periodo de estudio fueron muy similares a los valores que arrojan las estaciones de monitoreo, estos sensores se colocaron a una altura aproximada de 3 a 5 metros de altura y los gráficos que se muestran solo representan la calidad del aire en los puntos donde se colocaron durante el periodo de estudio.Los valores obtenidos, no fueron de mucho impacto en comparación con los resultados de los sensores portátiles, esto no quiere decir que se dejan de lado los resultados si no, mostrar más atención a las acciones que se pueden llevar a cabo para minimizar el impacto negativo a exposición personal. | La información que se muestra en 0 de costos o ahorro energético, consumos o producción no se cuenta con ellos. | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147778 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 840161 | Municipality of Del Carmen | Philippines | Southeast Asia and Oceania | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 23 | AFOLU > Land use | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147779 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31051 | Coventry City Council | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Europe | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.3 | Is your city facing risks to public health or health systems associated with climate change? | 0 | 0 | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 147780 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50543 | Halifax Regional Municipality | Canada | North America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 5 | Social impact of hazard overall | 1 | Increased resource demand | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147781 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848971 | Balcarce | Argentina | Latin America | Transport | 10.4 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 7 | Customer-drive carshares (e.g. Car2Go, Drivenow) fleet size | 3 | Hybrid | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 147782 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31111 | Tokyo Metropolitan Government | Japan | East Asia | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.0a | Please detail which goals and targets are incorporated in your city’s master plan and describe how these goals are addressed in the table below. | 2 | How are these goals/targets addressed in the city master plan? | 17 | Improve the energy efficiency of overall water supply system that TMG manages by 20% by 2024 compared to 2000 levels | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147783 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 31446 | Taipei City Government | Taiwan, Greater China | East Asia | City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.15 | Please provide a summary of emissions factors and activity data used in your inventory. | 8 | Emission factor unit (denominator) | 14 | L | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147784 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58489 | Hoeje-Taastrup Kommune | Denmark | Europe | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6b | Please provide a summary of emissions by sector and scope as defined in the Global Protocol for Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC) in the table below. | 2 | Where data is not available, please explain why | 2 | Stationary Energy: energy use – Scope 2 (I.X.2) | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147785 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43917 | Sofia Municipality | Bulgaria | Europe | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0a | Please provide details of your total city-wide base year emissions reduction (absolute) target(s). In addition, you may add rows to provide details of your sector-specific targets, by providing the base year emissions specific to that target. | 3 | Boundary of target relative to city boundary (reported in 0.1) | 1 | Larger – covers the whole city and adjoining areas | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147786 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 42120 | City of Salvador | Brazil | Latin America | Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1a | Have you identified the most vulnerable geographic areas in your city? | 1 | Response | 1 | Vulnerable geographic areas | Yes | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147787 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 848476 | Municipalidad de Cañas | Costa Rica | Latin America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Planning | 5.5a | Please attach your city’s climate change mitigation plan below. If your city has both mitigation and energy access plans, please make sure to attach all relevant documents below. | 5 | Areas covered by action plan | 1 | Building and Infrastructure | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147788 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 32480 | City of Adelaide | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | Energy | 8.1 | Please indicate the source mix of electricity consumed in your city. | 12 | Year data applies to | 1 | Electricity source | 2019 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147789 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 44299 | Dangjin City | Republic of Korea | East Asia | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 11 | Does this target align with the global 1.5 - 2 °C pathway set out in the Paris agreement? | 9 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147790 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54253 | Wollongong City Council | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 12 | Total cost of the project | 18 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||||
| 147791 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 845302 | Paraíso | Costa Rica | Latin America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 2 | Stationary energy > Commercial buildings & facilities | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147792 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 826429 | Município de Figueira da Foz | Portugal | Europe | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.2 | Please list the local government departments involved in the GCC program and its role. It is important to specify the program coordinator, action plan developer, GHG inventory accountant, verifier and action plan implementer. | 5 | Attach organigram or other relevant reference document | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147793 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 845309 | Puente Piedra | Peru | Latin America | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0b | Please provide details of your total fixed level target(s). | 10 | Select the initiatives that this target contributes towards | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147794 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 54075 | City of Lakewood | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.3 | Please give the name of the primary protocol, standard, or methodology you have used to calculate your city’s city-wide GHG emissions. | 2 | Comment | 1 | Emissions methodology | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147795 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 58796 | Odder Kommune | Denmark | Europe | Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.2 | Please list the local government departments involved in the GCC program and its role. It is important to specify the program coordinator, action plan developer, GHG inventory accountant, verifier and action plan implementer. | 1 | Name of the department | 0 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147796 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 35993 | Singapore Government | Singapore | Southeast Asia and Oceania | Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 18 | Role in the GCC program | 8 | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | |||
| 147797 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 74386 | Gangtok | India | South and West Asia | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 18 | Total Waste | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147798 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 60114 | City of Gdynia | Poland | Europe | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 7 | Please explain any excluded sources, identify any emissions covered under an ETS and provide any other comments | 3 | Stationary energy > Institutional buildings & facilities | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147799 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 50394 | Prefeitura Municipal de João Pessoa | Brazil | Latin America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 21 | Total IPPU | Question not applicable | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 | ||
| 147800 | Cities 2020 | 2020 | 43908 | City of Milwaukee | United States of America | North America | City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 1 | Direct emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) | 18 | Total Waste | 5000 | 07/16/2021 01:47:15 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2020. To view the complete cities 2020 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked in 2020, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities. Please contact cities@cdp.net if you have any questions.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and 5 American regional councils, which are: Chicago Metropolitan Mayors Caucus; Denver Regional Council of Governments; Metropolitan Council, Twin Cities; Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; and Mid-America Regional Council.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 8976
- Downloads
- 860
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2020 full cities dataset, cities, 2020
- Row Label
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
