Go back to the interactive dataset
2021 Full Cities Dataset for Excel - North America
This is a filtered view based on 2021 Full Cities Dataset.
| Row number | Questionnaire | Year Reported to CDP | Account Number | Organization | Country | CDP Region | Parent Section | Section | Question Number | Question Name | Column Number | Column Name | Row Number | Row Name | Response Answer | Comments | File Name | Last update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 192451 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 862673 | City of Selkirk, MB | Canada | North America | 4. City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 8 | Transportation > On-road | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||
| 192452 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 54110 | City of Santa Monica, CA | United States of America | North America | 3. Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 12 | Total cost provided by the local government (currency) | 2 | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||||
| 192453 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 74488 | City of Beverly, MA | United States of America | North America | 10. Transport | 10.1 | What is the mode share of each transport mode in your city for passenger transport? | 9 | Other | 1 | Please complete | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192454 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 31117 | City of Toronto, ON | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 2 | Action title | 36 | Biodiversity Strategy | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192455 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 50559 | City of St Catharines, ON | Canada | North America | 10. Transport | 10.2 | What is the mode share of each transport mode in your city for freight transport? | 2 | Comment | 1 | Motorcycle/Two-wheeler | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192456 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 43905 | City of San Antonio, TX | United States of America | North America | 0. Introduction | City Details | 0.3 | Please provide information about your city’s Mayor or equivalent legal representative authority in the table below. | 1 | Leader title | 1 | Please complete | Mayor | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||
| 192457 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 54030 | City of Little Rock, AR | United States of America | North America | 4. City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 18 | Total Waste | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||
| 192458 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 54029 | City of Spokane, WA | United States of America | North America | 4. City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 27 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > CHP generation | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192459 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 31090 | District of Columbia, DC | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.2 | Please identify and describe the factors that most greatly affect your city’s ability to adapt to climate change and indicate how those factors either support or challenge this ability. | 4 | Please describe how the factor supports or challenges the adaptive capacity of your city | 2 | The District is the seat of the Federal Government and is heavily reliant on that industry, both fiscally and economically. The extent to which this is true became evident during the 2013 government shutdown, during which most Federal operations were suspended for 16 days. The economic impact of the shutdown was $140M, which disproportionately affected DC's low-income residents -- a freeze on our budget authority prevent payments to managed care organizations serving 220,000 low income residents; lower wage contract workers were not reimbursed for their time; and vulnerable populations are largely employed in hospitality, retail, and other service jobs that were the first private sector jobs experiencing layoffs during the shutdown. In 2018/2019 DC experienced an even longer shutdown lasting 35 days. The costs of that shutdown are still being tallied, but estimates are that it cost the District over $47 million in local revenue. Our challenge is to improve resiliency in a city so dependent on an industry that is both inaccessible to large sections of our lower skilled residents, and which can disproportionately affect such residents when it experiences shocks. | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192460 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 54100 | City of Columbia, MO | United States of America | North America | 10. Transport | 10.11 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 9 | Publicly available? | 1 | PM2.5 (1 year (annual) mean) | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192461 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 863407 | Town of Durham, NH | United States of America | North America | 4. City-wide Emissions | GCoM Emission Factor and Activity Data | 4.14 | State if the emissions factors and activity data used to calculate your cities emissions are accessible within the attached emissions inventory in question 4.5. If so, please describe where these are located within the attached inventory. | 1 | Emissions factors and activity data accessibility | 1 | Emissions factors and Activity Data Reported | Emissions factors and activity data are accessible within the attached inventory in question 4.5 | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||
| 192462 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 59538 | City of Mississauga, ON | Canada | North America | 4. City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 3 | Indirect emissions from the use of grid-supplied electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling (metric tonnes CO2e) | 28 | Generation of grid-supplied energy > Heat/cold generation | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192463 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 54113 | City of Flagstaff, AZ | United States of America | North America | 3. Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and/or resilience and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 13 | Description of the stakeholder engagement processes | 2 | The goals, strategies, and indicators presented in the CAAP were developed through collaboration with over 1,000 Flagstaff residents, technical experts, City staff, and City Council members. The City engaged both a Technical Committee of subject experts and a Steering Committee focused on policy impacts. Climate change is a challenging issue to tackle due to its global impacts and the multi-faceted nature of contributing factors. To achieve resident buy-in, outreach emphasized the local community: the unique Flagstaff values at risk and the benefits of local action, rather than referencing impersonal graphs or global challenges.Critical to community discussions was highlighting connections among climatic changes and the downstream effects on the broader community, like health, economic growth, housing, and infrastructure. The CAAP addresses how warmer winters affect not only the snowpack on surrounding mountains, but also the paycheck of a father working at a downtown restaurant and the relationship to Flagstaff’s existing affordability challenges. The CAAP considers how high-severity wildfires affect forests, but also the effects on public health for residents, whether through decreases in recreation or smoke impacts for those with asthma, who are more likely to be from lower-income communities.Outreach took place throughout the Plan development process. The City:•Held a public meeting to discuss what a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan could look like for Flagstaff.•Invited community members to help develop a scope of work for technical consultants•Formed a 15-person Steering Committee comprised of City staff, partners, technical experts, and businesspeople.•Hosted nine interactive community open houses over 10 months, drawing 500+ attendees.•Engaged the public through multiple other methods including four online surveys, five City Council meetings, Coffee and Climate meet-ups, a monthly newsletter and outreach at unrelated community events.•The City involved youth through a Climate Action Challenge and first-ever Youth Climate Summit. | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192464 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 53879 | City of Jersey City, NJ | United States of America | North America | 8. Energy | 8.2 | For each type of renewable energy within the city boundary, please report the installed capacity (MW) and annual generation (MWh). | 4 | Comment | 5 | Bioenergy (Biomass and Biofuels) | Information not available | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192465 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 58621 | Town of Blacksburg, VA | United States of America | North America | 3. Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 13 | Total cost provided by the majority funding source (currency) | 11 | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||||
| 192466 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 35857 | City of Cincinnati, OH | United States of America | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.0d | Please provide details of your total city-wide baseline scenario target(s), including projected business as usual emissions. | 16 | Does this target align to a requirement from a higher level of government? | 0 | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192467 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 59696 | City of Longmont, CO | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 7 | Please identify which vulnerable populations are affected | 4 | Marginalized groups | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192468 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 53959 | City of Fayetteville, AR | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 2 | Did this hazard significantly impact your city before 2021? | 7 | No | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192469 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 59538 | City of Mississauga, ON | Canada | North America | 3. Adaptation | Adaptation Planning | 3.2a | Please provide more information on your plan that addresses climate change adaptation and/or resilience and attach the document. Please provide details on the boundary of your plan, and where this differs from your city’s boundary, please provide an explanation. | 3 | Sectors/areas covered by plan that addresses climate change adaptation | 1 | Industry | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192470 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 37241 | City of Berkeley, CA | United States of America | North America | 10. Transport | 10.3 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 7 | Customer-drive carshares (e.g. Car2Go, Drivenow) fleet size | 2 | Electric | ASk Sarah | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192471 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 59552 | City of Davis, CA | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 5 | Social impact of hazard overall | 3 | Increased demand for public services | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192472 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 74594 | City of Boynton Beach, FL | United States of America | North America | 3. Adaptation | Adaptation Goals | 3.3 | Please describe the main goals of your city’s adaptation efforts and the metrics / KPIs for each goal. | 1 | Adaptation goal | 0 | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||||
| 192473 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 60656 | City of Piedmont, CA | United States of America | North America | 12. Food | 12.1 | What is the per capita meat and dairy consumption (kg/yr) in your city? | 2 | Year data applies to | 2 | Dairy consumption per capita (kg/year) | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||||
| 192474 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 3417 | New York City, NY | United States of America | North America | 4. City-wide Emissions | Historical emissions inventories | 4.13 | Please provide details on any historical, base year or recalculated city-wide emissions inventories your city has, in order to allow assessment of targets in the table below. | 3 | Scopes / boundary covered | 1 | Scope 2 (indirect) | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192475 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 61790 | City of Emeryville, CA | United States of America | North America | 7. Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.5 | Please give the total amount of fuel (refers to Scope 1 emissions) that your local government has consumed this year. | 1 | Source | 6 | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192476 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 54096 | City of Saint John, NB | Canada | North America | 10. Transport | 10.3 | Please provide the total fleet size and number of vehicle types for the following modes of transport. | 4 | Number of freight vehicles | 2 | Electric | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||||
| 192477 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 50551 | City of Long Beach, CA | United States of America | North America | 3. Adaptation | Adaptation Actions | 3.0 | Please describe the main actions you are taking to reduce the risk to, and vulnerability of, your city’s infrastructure, services, citizens, and businesses from climate change as identified in the Climate Hazards section. | 9 | Finance status | 4 | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||||
| 192478 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 50543 | Halifax Regional Municipality, NS | Canada | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.1 | Please list the most significant climate hazards faced by your city and indicate the probability and consequence of these hazards, as well as the expected future change in frequency and intensity. Please also select the most relevant assets or services that are affected by the climate hazard and provide a description of the impact. | 12 | Please describe the impacts experienced so far, and how you expect the hazard to impact in the future | 4 | Increased damage to infrastructure, transportation, and communities (residential property, commercial property and services, and public health) due to periodic loss of electricity (impacting space-heating, personal hygiene/sanitation and ability to prepare food), disruption of water and wastewater services, increased flood risk, and health risks for vulnerable populations related to extreme winter storms and extreme cold conditions. | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192479 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 59588 | Town of Chapel Hill, NC | United States of America | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Planning | 5.5a | Please attach your city’s climate change mitigation plan below. If your city has both mitigation and energy access plans, please make sure to attach all relevant documents below. | 1 | Publication title and attach document | 1 | Town of Chapel Hill Climate Action and Response Plan | CHClimateActionandResponse.pdf | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||
| 192480 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 60603 | City of Prince George, BC | Canada | North America | 4. City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.8 | Please indicate if your city-wide emissions have increased, decreased, or stayed the same since your last emissions inventory, and describe why. | 2 | Primary reason for change | 1 | Please explain | Improved data accuracy | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||
| 192481 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 54034 | City of Grand Rapids, MI | United States of America | North America | 6. Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.11 | Does your city have its own credit rating? | 1 | Does your city have a credit rating? | 2 | Domestic | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||
| 192482 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 74573 | Snoqualmie, WA | United States of America | North America | 1. Governance and Data Management | Governance | 1.0 | Please detail sustainability goals and targets (e.g. GHG reductions) that are incorporated into your city’s master plan and describe how these are addressed in the table below. | 2 | Description | 1 | "Against a projected 2007 baseline, strive to reduce community greenhouse gas emissions 25% by 2020,50% by 2030, and 80% by 2050." | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192483 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 43909 | City of Orlando, FL | United States of America | North America | 2. Climate Hazards and Vulnerability | Climate Hazards | 2.3a | Please report on how climate change impacts health outcomes and health services in your city. | 7 | Please explain | 1 | With the already-dangerous heat conditions in Florida, these significant increases in temperatures, in terms of individual days, averages, and seasonal changes, present serious implications for the health of local residents. The risk for heat-related health impacts is highest amongst infants, young children, the elderly over 65, those already ill, athletes, those spending time outside, including outdoor workers, those engaging in physical activity, and those who don’t have access to air conditioning (Climate Central, “U.S. faces dramatic rise in extreme heat, humidity”, 2016), as well as those in more urban areas within the city, due an increase in the Urban Heat Island effect (Environmental Protection Agency & Center for Disease Control, 2016). Since 9.4% of Orlando’s residents are over the age of 65, 7.1% are under five years old, and one-in-five of all residents (20.2%) live at or below the poverty line, which is above average among the lower 48 states (U.S. Census Bureau, 2017), we have a large representation of groups are considered to be especially vulnerable to extreme heat. Furthermore, during dangerously hot days, the risk for these heat-related effects sharply increases and can reach even healthy young adults to middle-aged individuals. According to current predictions, annual heat-related deaths will increase to tens-of-thousands by the end of the century (Climate Central, “U.S. faces dramatic rise in extreme heat, humidity”, 2016), and, with the projections for our region, many of these deaths will occur in Central Florida. For individuals and families with pets that spend some or all of their time outside or do not have air conditioning, this also presents a serious risk (Florida Division of Emergency Management, 2013). These heat impacts may also provide a strain on the healthcare system when faced with increased hospitalizations and doctors’ visits, need for home care, and insurance claims. (Climate Central, “U.S. faces dramatic rise in extreme heat, humidity”, 2016).The impacts from high heat also interact with other climate hazards that can result in amplified risks. This elevated heat can contribute to stagnant air, which has been increasing in Central Florida, and allows dangerous levels of both air pollutants and ground-level ozone to build up in the local area (Climate Central, “Stagnant air on the rise, upping ozone risk”, 2016). The consequences include respiratory issues and increased risk of air-borne disease. Extreme heat can also compound drought conditions, elevated sink hole risks, and increased algae blooms and bacteria present in water (Climate Central, “U.S. faces dramatic rise in extreme heat, humidity”, 2016). Increases in extreme heat can lead to elevated hospitalizations, illness and death with a large segment of the population at risk. This danger is further elevated as an occupational hazard for those work outside, such as construction workers, crossing guards, athletes, landscaping professionals, groundskeepers, etc.Today, 1 in 3 American households struggle to afford their energy bills, and 1 in 5 are forced to decide between energy and other necessities (EIA RECS 2015). In Orange County Florida, energy affordability threatens the 175,470 households living below 200% of the federal poverty level. Cumulatively, these homes experienced a HEAG of $263.5 million in 2017 alone (Home Energy Affordability Report, 2018). This equates to $1,501 per household in energy costs above the affordability threshold, roughly equal to the state average ($1,507). HEAG trends are severe in Florida, with a HEAG Index of 195.2 compared to the national average of 123.4. This reflects a doubling of the FL HEAG since the 2011 baseline. As extreme heat patterns intensify, these trends can be anticipated to increase and threaten low income populations capacity to afford energy and other critical needs. Residents who do not have easy access to air-conditioning, cannot afford to cool their homes regularly, who have homes without proper weatherization, or those who need to walk, bike, or take public transportation are all at higher risk to extreme heat, even before health and age are factored in. Thus, low-income residents are at a disproportionately high risk for elevated heat events. | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192484 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 831234 | City of Fredericton, NB | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 23 | Attach reference document | 5 | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192485 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 10894 | City of Los Angeles, CA | United States of America | North America | 14. Water Security | Water Supply | 14.2a | Please identify the risks to your city’s water security as well as the timescale and level of risk. | 3 | Estimated magnitude of potential impact | 3 | Less Serious | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192486 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 10894 | City of Los Angeles, CA | United States of America | North America | 4. City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 2 | If you have no direct emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 11 | Transportation > Aviation | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192487 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 54111 | City of Iowa City, IA | United States of America | North America | 7. Local Government Emissions | Local Government Operations GHG Emissions Data | 7.5 | Please give the total amount of fuel (refers to Scope 1 emissions) that your local government has consumed this year. | 5 | Emissions (tonnes CO2e) | 13 | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192488 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 43908 | City of Milwaukee, WI | United States of America | North America | 6. Opportunities | Finance and Economic Opportunities | 6.11 | Does your city have its own credit rating? | 3 | Rating | 1 | International | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||
| 192489 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 50572 | City of Saint Paul, MN | United States of America | North America | 4. City-wide Emissions | City-wide GHG Emissions Data | 4.6a | The Global Covenant of Mayors requires committed cities to report their inventories in the format of the new Common Reporting Framework, to encourage standard reporting of emissions data. Please provide a breakdown of your city-wide emissions by sector and sub-sector in the table below. Where emissions data is not available, please use the relevant notation keys to explain the reason why. | 4 | If you have no indirect emissions to report, please select a notation key to explain why | 5 | Stationary energy > Agriculture | IE | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||
| 192490 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 74453 | City of Highland Park, IL | United States of America | North America | 8. Energy | 8.3a | Please provide details on your city’s energy efficiency targets. | 6 | Total energy consumed/produced covered by target in target year (in unit specified in column 2) | 0 | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||||
| 192491 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 50401 | City of Madison, WI | United States of America | North America | 10. Transport | 10.11 | Please provide city-wide average air pollution metrics from the monitoring sites within your city for the most recent three years. | 1 | Most recent years available (select year) | 4 | PM10 (Maximum 24-hour average) | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192492 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 58636 | City of Bellingham, WA | United States of America | North America | 12. Food | 12.1 | What is the per capita meat and dairy consumption (kg/yr) in your city? | 1 | Kg/Year/Capita | 1 | Meat consumption per capita (kg/year) | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||||
| 192493 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 54034 | City of Grand Rapids, MI | United States of America | North America | 9. Buildings | 9.1 | Does your city have emissions reduction targets (government operations, city wide targets) or energy efficiency targets for the following building types? | 4 | Please provide more details and/or link to more information about the energy efficiency target. | 1 | Commercial | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192494 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 863412 | City of Tumwater, WA | United States of America | North America | 4. City-wide Emissions | Historical emissions inventories | 4.13 | Please provide details on any historical, base year or recalculated city-wide emissions inventories your city has, in order to allow assessment of targets in the table below. | 3 | Scopes / boundary covered | 0 | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||||
| 192495 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 852443 | Ferndale, MI | United States of America | North America | 8. Energy | 8.3a | Please provide details on your city’s energy efficiency targets. | 4 | Total energy consumed/produced covered by target in base year (in unit specified in column 2) | 0 | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||||
| 192496 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 74594 | City of Boynton Beach, FL | United States of America | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5.4 | Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. | 5 | Start year of action | 3 | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | ||||
| 192497 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 59666 | City of Grande Prairie, AB | Canada | North America | 8. Energy | 8.4 | Please report the following energy access related information for your city. | 6 | Percentage of city population with access to clean cooking | 1 | Energy access | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192498 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 59605 | City of Colton, CA | United States of America | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Target setting | 5.3a | Please provide details on the use of transferable emissions. | 2 | Emissions saved (metric tonnes CO2e) | 0 | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192499 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 49347 | City of Omaha, NE | United States of America | North America | 9. Buildings | 9.1 | Does your city have emissions reduction targets (government operations, city wide targets) or energy efficiency targets for the following building types? | 2 | Please provide more details and/or link to more information about the emission reduction target. | 4 | New buildings | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 | |||
| 192500 | Cities 2021 | 2021 | 862760 | City of Oxford, OH | United States of America | North America | 10. Transport | 10.4 | Provide information on GHG emissions from the transport sector. | 1 | GHG emissions (tonne CO2e) | 6 | Freight transport | Question not applicable | 01/20/2022 02:27:05 |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This data is collected through the CDP-ICLEI Unified Reporting System. When using this data, please cite both organisations using the following wording: ‘This data was collected in partnership by CDP and ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability’.
This dataset contains the full responses of publicly disclosing cities in 2021. The platform is still open and the dataset is updated daily to reflect new submissions.
To view the cities 2021 questionnaire guidance, including all questions asked to cities in 2021, visit https://www.cdp.net/en/guidance/guidance-for-cities.
For any questions, including guidance on how to reference this data in your own work, please contact cities@cdp.net.
Please note that this dataset may contain data from cities or, in some instances, groups of cities at different administrative levels. This includes metropolitan areas, combined authorities, and some regional councils.
When using the inventory data for aggregation, comparison and trend analysis, please note that the inventory data is based on non-verified self-reported city inputs. The reported inventory may not include all emission sources within the city boundary.
This dataset contains data pulled from the CDP Cities North America Authority Region.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 2046
- Downloads
- 24
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- Governance
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- 2021, cities
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
