Go back to the interactive dataset
2021-10-14 Cities 2021 Question 5.4 Emissions Reduction Actions
| Row number | Questionnaire Name | Account Number | Account Name | Country | CDP Region | ParentSection | Section | RowNumber | RowName | 5.4 C1 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Mitigation action | 5.4 C2 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Action title | 5.4 C3 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Means of implementation | 5.4 C4 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Implementation status | 5.4 C5 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Start year of action | 5.4 C6 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - End year of action | 5.4 C7 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Estimated emissions reduction (metric tonnes CO2e) | 5.4 C8 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Energy savings (MWh) | 5.4 C9 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Renewable energy production (MWh) | 5.4 C10 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Timescale of reduction / savings / energy product | 5.4 C11 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Co-benefit area | 5.4 C12 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Action description and implementation progress | 5.4 C13 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Finance status | 5.4 C14 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Total cost of the project | 5.4 C15 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Total cost provided by the local government | 5.4 C16 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Majority funding source | 5.4 C17 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Total cost provided by the majority funding sourc | 5.4 C18 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Web link to action website | 5.4 C19 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Name of the stakeholder group | 5.4 C20 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Role in the GCC program | 5.4 C21 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Name of the engagement activities | 5.4 C22 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Aim of the engagement activities | 5.4 C23 - Describe the anticipated outcomes of the most impactful mitigation actions your city is currently undertaking; the total cost of the action and how much is being funded by the local government. - Attach reference document |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 12 | Outdoor Lighting > LED / CFL / other luminaire technologies | EFFICIENTAMENTO ENERGETICO ILLUMINAZIONE PUBBLICA | Infrastructure development; Development and implementation of action plan | Implementation complete | 2019 | 2030 | 28000 | 88000 | Projected lifetime | Trasformazione impianti di illuminazione pubblica in ottica Smart City: piano LED (in ultimazione) con l’utilizzo di tecnologia adattiva (test-bed DIADEME-LIFE) e palo intelligente.Considerando un intervento di relamping 81% e l’adozione di smartlighting al 30% della città, l’investimento è di 47 milioni € + 2.7 milioni € con un risparmio energetico di 88 MWh/a. Tale investimento condurrebbe alla creazione di circa 303 Unità Lavorative (dirette e indirette). | 49700000 | 47000000 | Local | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||
| 352 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 13 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | EFFICIENTAMENTO ENERGETICO IMPIANTI NATATORI COMUNALI | Development and implementation of action plan | Pre-implementation | 2021 | 2030 | 2020 | 3800 | Job creation; Greening the economy; Economic growth; Enhanced climate change adaptation | Gli interventi che sono a disposizione per la riqualificazione prevista di 8 strutture natatorie sono vari e molteplici.Secondo valutazioni ENEA attraverso l’analisi delle diagnosi energetiche, gli interventi principalmente proposti sono: gestionali (BEMS e monitoraggio), copertura teli, manutenzione, illuminazione, pompe, inverter, UTA, caldaia/pompe di calore, recupero calore, cogenerazione ad Alto Rendimento (CAR), involucro, fonti Rinnovabili.Attori coinvolti: Roma Capitale, CONI, Federazione Italiana Nuoto, ENEA, GSE.Per l’assunzione sui costi di investimento necessari è stata considerata la possibilità di accedere a: cogenerazione ad alto rendimento CAR, Conto termico, Fondo Nazionale Efficienza Energetica, Piano di Sviluppo Resiliente Sostenibile e Inclusivo per Roma Capitale.L’azione rientra inoltre negli interventi ammissibili come misura prevista dall’art. 1, comma 29, della legge 27 dicembre 2019, n. 160 (legge di bilancio 2020).È possibile ricorrere anche agli Energy Performance Contract con ESCo private o gli interventi gestiti da una ESCo-PP comunale.La stima di risparmio energetico al 2030 è di 20200 MWh/a | Pre-feasibility study status | 2700000 | Other, please specify: possibilità di accedere a: cogenerazione ad alto rendimento CAR, Conto termico, Fondo Nazionale Efficienza Energetica, Piano di Sviluppo Resiliente Sostenibile e Inclusivo per Roma Capitale. | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||
| 353 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 14 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | EFFICIENTAMENTO ENERGETICO STRUTTURE ALBERGHIERE | Development and implementation of action plan | Pre-implementation | 2021 | 2030 | 2700 | 1400 | Projected lifetime | Enhanced climate change adaptation; Job creation; Economic growth; Greening the economy | Gli interventi che sono a disposizione per la riqualificazione delle strutture ricettive, portando quindi ad un risparmio energetico, sono vari e molteplici.Secondo valutazioni ENEA attraverso l’analisi delle diagnosi energetiche, gli interventi che hanno priorità riguardano:- sostituzione dei corpi luminosi- building automation- sostituzione degli impianti di climatizzazione/areazione, - sostituzione dei motori e degli inverter- installazione di impianti di cogenerazione/trigenerazione- riqualificazione dell’involucro- sostituzione della pompa di filtraggio delle piscine- produzione di vapore all’interno della SpA con un generatore a gas- sostituzione dei frigobar obsoleti. | 15000000 | Local | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||
| 354 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 15 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | EFFICIENTAMENTO ENERGETICO STRUTTURE SANITARIE | Infrastructure development; Financial mechanism; Development and implementation of action plan | Pre-implementation | 2021 | 2030 | 13000 | 6600 | Projected lifetime | Enhanced climate change adaptation; Greening the economy; Social inclusion, social justice; Social community and labour improvements; Economic growth | Gli ospedali e le strutture sanitarie in generale rappresentano dei centri di consumo importanti sia dal punto di vista elettrico che termico. Ai grossi prelievi di energia elettrica e termica dalle reti pubbliche sono associati costi di gestione considerevoli.Secondo valutazioni ENEA attraverso l’analisi delle diagnosi energetiche, gli interventi previsti sono - Gestionali (BEMS e monitoraggio)- Cogenerazione/trigenerazione ad alto rendimento- Illuminazione- Pompe- Inverter- UTA/chiller- Centrale termica- InvolucroAttori coinvolti: strutture a gestione diretta/IRCC pubbliche; Strutture private/case di cura/IRCC.Per l’assunzione sui costi di investimento necessari è possibile utilizzare l’accesso ai finanziamenti di Cogenerazione ad alto rendimento CAR, Conto termico, Ecobonus, Fondo Nazionale Efficienza Energetica, Fondi strutturali. | Pre-feasibility study status | 10000000 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||
| 355 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 16 | Energy Supply > Low or zero carbon energy supply generation | FER ATER | Development and implementation of action plan | Pre-implementation | 2021 | 2030 | 900 | 3770 | Projected lifetime | Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Poverty reduction / eradication; Social community and labour improvements; Reduced GHG emissions; Social inclusion, social justice; Economic growth; Job creation | Da analisi CRESME del 2014 sugli edifici di edilizia residenziale del Comune di Roma è emerso che questi ammontano a 1.391. Ai fini della stima del potenziale è stata considerata solamente la quota di 613 abitazioni che afferisce a: edifici ad uso abitativo, edifici a uso ricettivo e edifici con posti auto a raso.Si stima di poter sfruttare per l'installazione di pannelli fotovoltaici una superficie pari a 462.000 m2Attori coinvolti: ATER, Roma Capitale, GSEI meccanismi di supporto alla realizzazione di tale intervento sono stati individuati in: scambio sul posto (SSP) e in alternativa incentivi per autoconsumo.Possono essere inoltre utilizzate altre fonti di finanziamento sia pubbliche (come l’utilizzo del superbonus 110) sia private.Il monitoraggio viene effettuato da Roma Capitale, ATER e GSE al fine di individuare annualmente gli interventi realizzati nell’ambito dell’edilizia residenziale del Comune, attraverso uno scambio biunivoco di informazioni relativo alle installazioni fotovoltaiche e agli interventi compiuti all’interno del perimetro dell’analisi. | Pre-feasibility study status | 2900000 | 2900000 | Local | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||
| 356 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 17 | Energy Supply > Low or zero carbon energy supply generation | FER COMMERCIO | Development and implementation of action plan | Pre-implementation | 2021 | 2030 | 16900 | 55900 | Projected lifetime | Greening the economy; Reduced GHG emissions; Economic growth; Job creation; Social community and labour improvements | MI, aziende GDO, GSE, Sportelli Energia Pulita, ESCOIstituti finanziari/bancari, Installatori e operatori/manutentoriAzione per penetrazione del fotovoltaico nei siti del settore commerciale, merceologico e auto-moto attraverso:- la sensibilizzazione e l’incremento della conoscenza degli amministratori di impresa e del personale coinvolto- l’avvio di partnership per la realizzazione e la gestione coordinata degli impianti-il co-finanziamento e/o l’attivazione di fondi strutturali;- l’attivazione delle ESCO e/o di istituti finanziari a supporto delle iniziative e a sostegno della gestionela conoscenza delle opportunità offerte dalle Comunità dell’energia e dall’autoconsumo | Pre-feasibility study status | 62000000 | Local | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||
| 357 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 18 | Energy Supply > Low or zero carbon energy supply generation | FER STRUTTURE ALBERGHIERE | Development and implementation of action plan | Pre-implementation | 2021 | 2030 | 1500 | 4940 | Projected lifetime | Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Job creation; Promote circular economy; Social community and labour improvements; Economic growth; Greening the economy | Stimolare la penetrazione degli impianti fotovoltaici presso le strutture ricettive attraverso la formazione dei rappresentanti di categoria delle strutture interessate, una campagna di divulgazione tra gli operatori di settore anche con il supporto degli Sportelli Energia Pulita e l’avvio di partnership per il finanziamento e la realizzazione degli impianti. La campagna informativa e le partnership verrebbero rinnovate annualmente.Si prevede di raggiungere una copertura di fotovoltaico sulle strutture alberghiere pari al 12,8% del totale. Attori coinvolti: Federalberghi Roma, installatori e operatori, Sportelli Energia Pulita, GSE, ESCO, istituti finanziari.I meccanismi di supporto a tale intervento sono stati individuati in: Scambio sul posto, Autoconsumo e Comunità dell’energia, detrazioni fiscali e contratti EPR. | Pre-feasibility study status | 4900000 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||
| 358 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 19 | Community-Scale Development > Green space and/ or biodiversity preservation and expansion | FORESTAZIONE URBANA SOSTENIBILE (fase 1 al 2030) | Implementation | 2021 | 2030 | Disaster Risk Reduction; Improved public health; Social inclusion, social justice; Reduced GHG emissions; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Ecosystem preservation and biodiversity improvement | Roma Capitale ha avviato un Programma di forestazione urbana attraverso due azioni fondamentali:1) integrazione del patrimonio arboreo perduto attraverso un Piano di sostituzione che si stima possa riguardare almeno il 20% del patrimonio arboreo (circa 20.000 alberi entro il 2030 e 60.000 entro il 2050)2) interventi di forestazione urbana che prevedono 1 milione di nuove alberature entro il 2030 (2 mil entro il 2050)ASSORBIMENTO CO2 medio: una stima cautelativa prevede 5 kg di CO2 /anno per albero. In mancanza di dati certi non si è per ora inserito il contributo all'obiettivo 2030. | Feasibility finalized, and finance partially secured | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||||||||
| 359 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 20 | GEOTERMIA A BASSA ENTALPIA | Scoping | 2021 | 2030 | 9000 | 59400 | La geotermia a bassa/bassissima entalpia permette di sfruttare il calore presente nel sottosuolo e utilizzarlo come serbatoio termico a profondità piuttosto modeste (da pochi metri a circa 150 metri di profondità). Ne consegue che gli edifici residenziali e industriali possono trarre un notevole vantaggio sostituendo con le pompe di calore geotermiche la tipica caldaia a gas metano e il gruppo frigo per la climatizzazione e la produzione di acqua sanitaria limitando significativamente l’emissione dei gas serra come la CO2. È stata realizzata una attenta analisi sul potenziale della geotermia a Roma. Roma potrebbe avere uno sviluppo superiore alla media italiana di incremento sia del settore PDC sia dei dati di base relativi al settore geotermico. | Pre-feasibility study status | 720000000 | (Sub)national | https://www.gse.it/documenti_site/Documenti%20GSE/Studi%20e%20scenari/Studio%20GSE-RSE%20geotermia%20Roma%20Capitale.pdf | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 360 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 21 | Waste > Improve the efficiency of waste collection | GREEN CARD PUNTI SOSTENIBILITÀ | Verification activities; Awareness raising program or campaign; Monitor activities; Education | Implementation | 2019 | 2021 | 4750 | Projected lifetime | Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Social community and labour improvements; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Promote circular economy; Greening the economy | I comportamenti e le azioni dei cittadini volti alla riduzione della produzione dei rifiuti e alla loro corretta gestione sono “contabilizzati” con un sistema di rilevazione che permette di incentivare i comportamenti attraverso sgravi fiscali (riduzione della parte variabile della Ta.Ri.) o altri sistemi di incentivazione.Una prima applicazione è iniziata con l’istallazione di eco-compattatori per la raccolta degli imballaggi in PET posizionati in punti presidiati, come le stazioni della metropolitana, dove i conferimenti di tali rifiuti operati dai cittadini sono premiati con biglietti omaggio per il trasporto pubblico.Attori coinvolti: Roma Capitale, AMA SpA, cittadini (utenze domestiche), Grande Distribuzione Organizzata (GDO).Riduzione prevista al 2030: 1% della produzione dei rifiuti (17.302 t) e 4750 tonnellate di CO2.Il finanziamento del progetto trova riscontro nella Tariffa Rifiuti. | Feasibility finalized, and finance partially secured | https://www.comune.roma.it/web/it/macchinette-mangia-plastica.page; https://youtu.be/b0UTeywz1Mo | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||||
| 361 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 22 | Mass Transit > Smart public transport | PIANO URBANO DELLA MOBILITÀ SOSTENIBILE DI ROMA CAPITALE (PUMS) | Infrastructure development; Development and implementation of action plan; Policy and regulation; Monitor activities; Verification activities | Implementation | 2019 | 2030 | 715528 | 2873606 | Per year | Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Social inclusion, social justice; Social community and labour improvements; Disaster Risk Reduction; Poverty reduction / eradication; Economic growth; Enhanced resilience; Improved public health; Reduced GHG emissions | Il Piano Urbano della Mobilità Sostenibile di Roma Capitale è stato adottato in agosto 2019, in sintesi il Piano prevede il potenziamento del trasporto pubblico:- circa 5 km e 5 nuove stazioni per la rete ferroviaria- circa 38 km e 37 nuove stazioni di metropolitana- circa 10 km e 20 nuove stazioni di nuove linee di sistemi a fune,- 58 km e 123 nuove fermate per la rete tranviaria e riorganizzazione ed ottimizzazione del trasporto di superficie- sostituzione veicoli flotta TPL con LEV, ULEV, NZEV e ZEV- azioni su pedonalizzazioni e isole ambientali- azioni di mobilità sostenibile e soft (elettrica, condivisa, ciclabilità).Alcune di queste azioni sono descritte in schede specifiche.Nel 2019 Roma ha presentato richiesta per il finanziamento di alcune opere strategiche del PUMS, predisponendo i progetti conformemente alle procedure del MIT e risultando idonea all’erogazione delle risorse per la maggior parte di questi, per un ammontare pari circa 700 milioni di euro. Roma sta al contempo predisponendo la richiesta di ulteriori fondi a valere sul II bando MIT dedicati al finanziamento dei PUMS in scadenza al 15/01/21. In agosto 2020 Roma Capitale ha presentato il Piano di sviluppo resiliente e inclusivo per la richiesta di accesso ai fondi UE nazionali previsti nel PNRR per alcune opere inerenti alla mobilità.Il potenziamento del trasporto pubblico, della mobilità condivisa e della ciclabilità è anche una azione di mitigazione della povertà e vulnerabilità energetica per tutti quei cittadini che non hanno un reddito sufficiente per permettersi il costo del carburante per le forme di mobilità privata. Inoltre, il miglioramento della qualità dell'aria con le ricadute positive in termini di qualità dell'aria porta vantaggi a tutti i city user e in maniera particolare per coloro che soffrono di malattie croniche respiratorie. | Feasibility finalized, and finance partially secured | 12200000000 | https://www.pumsroma.it/ | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||
| 362 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 23 | Waste > Waste prevention policies and programs | INCENTIVAZIONE ALLA RIDUZIONE DEI RIFIUTI ATTRAVERSO L’APPLICAZIONE DELLA TARIFFAZIONE PUNTUALE DELLA PRODUZIONE DI RIFIUTO SECCO RESIDUALE | Education; Monitor activities; Policy and regulation; Development and implementation of action plan | Implementation | 2019 | 2030 | 47510 | Projected lifetime | Roma Capitale prevede un progressivo passaggio a sistemi incentivanti della riduzione della produzione dei rifiuti e alla tariffa puntuale.A tale fine, l’amministrazione capitolina sta procedendo con la riorganizzazione dei sistemi di raccolta dei rifiuti urbani in tutti i Municipi della città, i cui elementi caratterizzanti sono i seguenti:1)Raccolta domiciliare: consolidamento ed estensione del servizio porta a porta (PAP); 2)Domus Ecologiche: sviluppo di un modello avanzato di raccolta porta a porta; 3)Cassonetti intelligenti: sviluppo di un modello di raccolta di prossimitàIl finanziamento del progetto trova riscontro nella Tariffa Rifiuti (Ta.Ri.)Riduzione prevista al 2030: 6% della produzione dei rifiuti (103.817 t) e 47510 tonnellate di CO2 | https://www.amaroma.it/raccolta-differenziata/3371-la-raccolta-differenziata-porta-a-porta-nel-xv.html | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||||||
| 363 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 24 | Energy Supply > Low or zero carbon energy supply generation | INPS FOTOVOLTAICO | Development and implementation of action plan | 200 | 780 | Projected lifetime | Sono state individuate circa 10 sedi sul territorio capitolino senza pertinenze condominiali con altre società e/o privati, per un totale di 23.000 m2 di superficie potenzialmente disponibile e 600 kW di potenza teorica installabile.I meccanismi di supporto alla realizzazione di tale intervento sono stati individuati nello scambio sul posto (SSP). Possono essere inoltre utilizzate altre fonti di finanziamento sia pubbliche sia private.Attori coinvolti: INPS, GSE, altri enti che condividono gli spazi delle sedi del Ministero del lavoro. | 700000 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||||||||
| 364 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 25 | LAVORO AGILE (SMARTWORKINKG) DIPENDENTI CAPITOLINI | Assessment and evaluation activities; Policy and regulation; Development and implementation of action plan | Implementation | 2020 | 2030 | 3990 | 16024 | Projected lifetime | L’attività lavorativa in forma agile da forma sperimentale ad emergenziale è diventata la forma ordinaria con cui molti dipendenti capitolini rendono la loro prestazione.I risultati attesi sono stati calcolati tenendo conto dell’adesione al lavoro agile del 60% dei dipendenti al 2030 (circa 13.800) strutturato in due giorni in presenza su 5, per un totale di 16.482.430 km annui evitati che corrispondono a 3,99 kt CO2Il fattore di conversione CO2/MWh utilizzato (0,249) è relativo al mix carburanti (61% gasolio e 39% benzina) utilizzato per il bilancio emissioni del Comune di Roma nel 2015 (metodo IPCC).Attori coinvolti: Tutte le strutture di Roma Capitale e i dipendenti capitoliniNella definizione del Piano di Sviluppo Resiliente Sostenibile e Inclusivo di Roma Capitale è stata presentata la scheda progetto “Potenziamento e messa sistema del Lavoro Agile nell’amministrazione di Roma Capitale” per un investimento di 5.000.000 di euro al fine di incentivare il ricorso al lavoro agile e raggiungere, nel breve termine (due anni) , una quota pari ad almeno il 30 % del personale appartenente alle famiglie professionali. L’investimento consentirà l’acquisizione di postazioni informatiche da destinare al personale tecnico-amministrativo impegnato nella modalità di lavoro agile. | Feasibility finalized, and finance partially secured | 5000000 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 365 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 26 | SPORTELLI CAPITOLINI ENERGIA PULITA A KM 0 | Development and implementation of action plan; Education; Stakeholder engagement; Verification activities; Monitor activities | Implementation | 2019 | 2050 | Nel 2019, grazie al progetto UE H2020 ASSIST2GETHER e con il supporto di GSE ed ENEA, sono stati formati 30 dipendenti da assegnare ai costituendi Sportelli Energia. In seguito all'emergenza COVID e all'evoluzione delle norme UE e nazionali e delle agevolazioni ed incentivi, è previsto un corso di aggiornamento e una rimodulazione dei servizi di ausilio a cittadini e imprese che verranno inizialmente erogati in modalità virtuale e successivamente presso alcune sedi municipali. Gli Sportelli Capitolini Energia Pulita a km0 avranno lo scopo di assistere i cittadini e PMI verso la decarbonizzazione, di godere dei vantaggi economici della transizione ecologica mitigando la povertà energetica.Attori coinvolti: Dipartimenti Tutela Ambientale,Trasformazione Digitale, Partecipazione, Comunicazione e Pari Opportunità; Municipi; Scuola di Formazione Capitolina; dipendenti formati provenienti dalle varie strutture capitoline; cittadini; PMI operanti nel territorio di Roma Capitale; ENEA;GSE; ESCoAd oggi nessun impegno di spesa per l’amministrazione capitolina.Gli Sportelli energia pulita a Km 0, oltre ad essere il vero strumento contro la vulnerabilità e povertà energetica, costituiranno una vera e propria rete ove la cittadinanza potrà, attraverso le informazioni e consulenza recepite, diventare parte attiva nell’attuazione del PAESC. | 0 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||||||
| 366 | Cities 2021 | 31110 | Roma Capitale | Italy | Europe | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 27 | Energy Supply > Low or zero carbon energy supply generation | SCUOLE FOTOVOLTAICHE | Development and implementation of action plan; Education | Pre-implementation | 2021 | 2030 | 5400 | 18200 | Projected lifetime | Social community and labour improvements; Job creation; Social inclusion, social justice; Economic growth | ealizzazione di tetti fotovoltaici grazie alla creazione di un fondo rotativo, che permetterà il finanziamento di ulteriori impianti. Si opererà anche per realizzare configurazioni di Comunità dell’energia rinnovabile.Si prevede di partire con 340 scuole fotovoltaiche con 6,8 milioni di €. Successivamente verranno comprese 60 - 80 annualmente. Nel 2030 le scuole fotovoltaiche saranno 987. | Feasibility undertaken | 6800000 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||
| 367 | Cities 2021 | 31111 | Tokyo Metropolitan Government | Japan | East Asia | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 1 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | Tokyo Cap-and-Trade Program | Policy and regulation; Development and implementation of action plan; Verification activities; Stakeholder engagement; Assessment and evaluation activities; Capacity building and training activities; Awareness raising program or campaign; Monitor activities | Operation | 2010 | 39000000 | 79750000 | 13000 | Projected lifetime | Disaster Risk Reduction; Improved public health; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Job creation; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Greening the economy; Enhanced resilience; Disaster preparedness; Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Resource conservation (e.g. soil, water); Reduced GHG emissions; Promote circular economy; Economic growth; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Social community and labour improvements; Social inclusion, social justice; Shift to more sustainable behaviours | ・The Tokyo Metropolitan Government (TMG) launched the Tokyo Cap-and-Trade Program in 2010, making it the world’s first city-level cap-and-trade program calling for mandatory CO2 reductions from not only large industrial buildings but also from commercial buildings.・Covered facilities are required to meet their allotted reduction targets through on-site energy efficiency measures or an emissions trading scheme. If they fail to achieve the required reductions, they face penalties such as fines and the public disclosure of their violations.・TMG sets up a compliance period in blocks of five-year periods. In FY 2019, emissions from the facilities were reduced by 27% compared to the base-year emissions. Since 2020, TMG have strengthened the compliance factor levels for the 3rd period until 2024 and shifted our focus to promoting the use of renewable power.・This program covers 1,200 large facilities which emit almost 20% of the CO2 emissions in Tokyo. Therefore emission reductions by those facilities greatly contribute to the overall emission reduction of Tokyo, and are considered to have a major role in the drastic reduction of energy consumption in existing buildings. | Finance secured | 473000000 | Local | http://www.kankyo.metro.tokyo.jp/en/climate/cap_and_trade/index.html | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||
| 368 | Cities 2021 | 31111 | Tokyo Metropolitan Government | Japan | East Asia | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 2 | Energy Supply > Low or zero carbon energy supply generation | TMG (Tokyo Metropolitan Government) Power Plan | Stakeholder engagement | Operation | 2020 | Enhanced resilience; Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Disaster preparedness; Disaster Risk Reduction; Economic growth; Social inclusion, social justice; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Job creation; Reduced GHG emissions; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Promote circular economy; Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Greening the economy; Resource conservation (e.g. soil, water) | Since FY 2019, we have switched electricity supplied to the TMG No.1Building to power entirely sourced from renewable energy.In addition, since FY 2020, we have been promoting the TMG Power Plan that aggressively uses power entirely sourced from renewable energy at TMG facilities, which includes post-FIT* electricity generated by solar power generators at home in Tokyo.* Post-FIT refers to equipment for which the purchase period of FIT (a system for purchasing renewable power at a fixed price for a certain period started by the national government in 2012) has ended. Such equipment is expected to increase at an accelerating rate from November 2019. | Finance secured | Local | p15 https://www.kankyo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/en/about_us/videos_documents/documents_1.files/creating_a_sustainable_city_2020_eng.pdf | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||||||
| 369 | Cities 2021 | 31111 | Tokyo Metropolitan Government | Japan | East Asia | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 3 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | Tokyo Carbon Reduction Reporting Program for SMFs (Small and Medium-sized Facilities) | Monitor activities; Assessment and evaluation activities | Operation | 2010 | Greening the economy; Disaster Risk Reduction; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Resource conservation (e.g. soil, water); Social community and labour improvements; Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Promote circular economy; Enhanced resilience; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Economic growth; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Job creation; Reduced GHG emissions; Improved public health; Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Social inclusion, social justice; Disaster preparedness | In Tokyo, there are about 690,000 small and medium-sized facilities that consume less than 1,500 kl of crude oil per year (crude oil equivalent). They account for about 60% of the total CO2 emissions in the commercial and industrial sectors in Tokyo.By Tokyo ordinances, TMG introduced the Carbon Reduction Reporting Program in April 2010 to encourage owners of small and medium facilities to identify their CO2 emissions and implement energy efficiency measures. Since FY 2020, TMG has introduced a mechanism that evaluates and publicizes businesses with excellent reduction performance or that have made great efforts to introduce renewable energy in order to motivate businesses to take action. | Finance secured | Local | p11 https://www.kankyo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/en/about_us/videos_documents/documents_1.files/creating_a_sustainable_city_2020_eng.pdf | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||||||
| 370 | Cities 2021 | 31111 | Tokyo Metropolitan Government | Japan | East Asia | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 4 | Buildings > Building performance rating and reporting | Green Building Program | Assessment and evaluation activities; Policy and regulation | Operation | 2002 | Ecosystem preservation and biodiversity improvement; Social community and labour improvements; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Enhanced resilience; Job creation; Economic growth; Reduced GHG emissions; Promote circular economy; Disaster Risk Reduction; Greening the economy; Disaster preparedness; Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Resource conservation (e.g. soil, water); Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Social inclusion, social justice; Enhanced climate change adaptation | Based on TMG ordinances, TMG has been implementing the program to require owners who build large buildings to submit a Building Environmental Plan since 2002. An outline of the plan is then made public by TMG.Through this program, we encourage their voluntary environmental conservation efforts at the architectural planning stage and aim to form a market that attributes value to environmentally conscious buildings.Subject to TMG’s evaluation criteria, building owners make three-grade evaluations of their efforts in four areas of environmental considerations: rational use of energy, proper use of resources, natural environment conservation and mitigation of heat island effects.Since FY 2020, TMG has expanded the program coverage to medium-sized buildings and introduced ZEB (Net Zero Energy Building) Evaluation as the highest rank in the energy efficiency assessment. | Finance secured | https://www.kankyo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/en/climate/build.html | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||||
| 371 | Cities 2021 | 31111 | Tokyo Metropolitan Government | Japan | East Asia | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5 | Buildings > Building performance rating and reporting | subsidy for new residential buildings that meet the Tokyo Zero Emission House standards | Financial mechanism; Education; Assessment and evaluation activities | Operation | 2019 | Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Disaster Risk Reduction; Job creation; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Enhanced resilience; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Social inclusion, social justice; Economic growth; Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Promote circular economy; Reduced GHG emissions; Disaster preparedness; Greening the economy | To reduce energy consumption at home, it is critical to make residential buildings more energy efficient, including improvements in thermal insulation.Aiming for the spread of houses with high energy-efficient performance matching the regional characteristics of Tokyo, since October 2019 (through FY 2020) TMG has subsidized new residential buildings that meet the Tokyo Zero Emission House standards. | Finance secured | Local | 1800000000 | p12 https://www.kankyo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/en/about_us/videos_documents/documents_1.files/creating_a_sustainable_city_2020_eng.pdf | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 372 | Cities 2021 | 31111 | Tokyo Metropolitan Government | Japan | East Asia | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 6 | Energy Supply > Low or zero carbon energy supply generation | “Let’s Use Natural Electricity” campaign (model project to promote group buying of renewable power by households) | Awareness raising program or campaign | Operation | 2020 | Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Social inclusion, social justice; Disaster preparedness; Job creation; Disaster Risk Reduction; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Greening the economy; Promote circular economy; Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Reduced GHG emissions; Poverty reduction / eradication; Resource conservation (e.g. soil, water); Economic growth; Enhanced resilience | Tokyo Metropolitan Government is committed to realizing the reduction in the price of renewable energy by recruiting prospective purchasers of renewable energy to increase purchasing power. We are conducting the "Let’s Use Natural Electricity" campaign to encourage Tokyo residents etc. to purchase renewable power. It is a mechanism that allows renewable power to be used even in households where solar panels cannot be installed. We are also expanding our efforts in collaboration with local governments in the metropolitan area. | Finance secured | Local | p14 https://www.kankyo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/en/about_us/videos_documents/documents_1.files/creating_a_sustainable_city_2020_eng.pdf | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||||||
| 373 | Cities 2021 | 31111 | Tokyo Metropolitan Government | Japan | East Asia | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 7 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | Tokyo Zero-emission Points Program | Financial mechanism | Operation | 2019 | 2021 | 140000 | Projected lifetime | Economic growth; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Job creation; Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Reduced GHG emissions; Greening the economy; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Enhanced climate change adaptation; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Social inclusion, social justice; Enhanced resilience; Poverty reduction / eradication | Since October 2019, TMG has been implementing new action to grant Tokyo Zero Emission Points that can be exchanged for gift certificates or LED light bulbs coupons. The points will be given to Tokyo residents who have replaced their air conditioners, refrigerators or water heaters, which typically consume larger amounts of energy, with those having a high energy-efficient performance.TMG also provides energy efficiency advice to those who have made the replacement to improve their energy efficiency awareness. | Finance secured | Local | 4500000000 | p12 https://www.kankyo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/en/about_us/videos_documents/documents_1.files/creating_a_sustainable_city_2020_eng.pdf | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||
| 374 | Cities 2021 | 31111 | Tokyo Metropolitan Government | Japan | East Asia | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 8 | Private Transport > Improve fuel economy and reduce CO2 from motorized vehicles | Promote the spread of zero emission vehicles (ZEVs) | Stakeholder engagement; Infrastructure development; Development and implementation of action plan; Education; Awareness raising program or campaign | Operation | 2019 | Enhanced resilience; Disaster preparedness; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Reduced GHG emissions; Social inclusion, social justice; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Disaster Risk Reduction; Job creation; Greening the economy; Economic growth; Promote circular economy | In the "Zero Emission Tokyo Strategy 2020 Update & Report" formulated in March 2021, the following two are listed as the vision for 2050.・All cars driven in Tokyo to be ZEVs・Expanded use of renewable energy realizing zero emissions from well to wheelTo achieve these two goals, we have set the following key targets toward 2030.・Phasing out the sale of new gasoline-only passenger cars : 100%・Phasing out the sale of new gasoline-only motorcycles : 100% (2035 target)・Market share of ZEVs in new passenger car sales : 50%・Introduction of zero emission buses : 300+・New small route buses for sale : Limited to ZEVs in principle・Fast chargers : 1,000・Hydrogen stations : 150 | Finance secured | Local | p17 https://www.kankyo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/en/about_us/videos_documents/documents_1.files/creating_a_sustainable_city_2020_eng.pdf https://www.kankyo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/en/about_us/zero_emission_tokyo/strategy.files/Full-ver.ZEV-strategy.pdf | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||||||
| 375 | Cities 2021 | 31111 | Tokyo Metropolitan Government | Japan | East Asia | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 9 | Private Transport > Improve fuel economy and reduce CO2 from motorized vehicles | Vehicle Emission Reduction Program | Assessment and evaluation activities; Development and implementation of action plan; Policy and regulation; Stakeholder engagement | Operation | 2001 | 1430000 | Projected lifetime | Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Reduced GHG emissions; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy) | To reduce the environmental impact of vehicles, TMG has made mandatory the submission every 5 years of the plans for and results of voluntary efforts considering environmental factors by all companies using 30 or more vehicles. Through efforts including the implementation of specified low-emission vehicles and fuel-efficient vehicles, eco-driving, and intelligent use of vehicles, we were able to reduce CO2 emissions by 1.43 million tons in the 5-year period between 2011 and 2015. This initiative is currently being continued from 2016 to 2021*. *The compliance period supposed to end in FY 2020 has been extended by one year in consideration of the impact of the stagnation of economic activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic. | Finance secured | Local | p32 https://www.kankyo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/en/about_us/videos_documents/documents_1.files/creating_a_sustainable_city_2020_eng.pdf | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||||
| 376 | Cities 2021 | 31114 | City of Sydney | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 1 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | CitySwitch Sydney program | Assessment and evaluation activities; Stakeholder engagement; Monitor activities; Awareness raising program or campaign; Capacity building and training activities; Sustainable public procurement; Education; Development and implementation of action plan; Verification activities | Operation | 2015 | 186000 | 0 | Per year | Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Greening the economy; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Reduced GHG emissions | CitySwitch Green Office is a national office tenant energy efficiency program run in partnership with the local governments of Sydney, North Sydney, Willoughby, Adelaide, Perth, Melbourne and the national partner: Net Balance Foundation. The program is also supported by the NABERS national administrator: the Office of Environment and Heritage (NSW). The City of Sydney is the national administrator. The program provides advice, resources and recognition to participants who commit to achieving highly energy efficient offices as measured by the NABERS Energy rating system.Data in this report describes achievements and costs of CitySwitch Sydney program only (not entire national CitySwitch program).Emissions saved and cost of program data is given on program lifetime to date basis. | Finance secured | Local | https://cityswitch.net.au/ | |||||||||||
| 377 | Cities 2021 | 31114 | City of Sydney | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 2 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | Better Buildings Partnership | Development and implementation of action plan; Monitor activities; Awareness raising program or campaign; Verification activities; Education; Assessment and evaluation activities; Stakeholder engagement; Sustainable public procurement; Capacity building and training activities | Operation | 2010 | 142000 | Per year | Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Reduced GHG emissions; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Greening the economy | The Better Buildings Partnership (BBP) is a collaborative partnership with Sydney’s leading commercial building owners committed to assisting the City to meet its Sydney 2030 objectives. The Partnership plays an important role in developing and advocating for solutions to key issues and helps unlock improvements to environmental performance in the commercial building sector and connect to the City’s green infrastructure plans. The Partnership is directed by a Leadership Panel, consisting of the sustainability managers of the founding members, and delivers solutions as agreed in an annual work plan defined by its members. Members are collectively saving $30 million a year in avoided energy costs.Emissions saved and cost of program data is given on program lifetime to date basis. | Finance secured | Local | http://www.betterbuildingspartnership.com.au/ | ||||||||||||
| 378 | Cities 2021 | 31114 | City of Sydney | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 3 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | Energy Efficiency Master Plan | Assessment and evaluation activities; Infrastructure development; Development and implementation of action plan; Monitor activities; Stakeholder engagement | Implementation | 1980000 | 0 | Other, please specify : Target 2030 | Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Enhanced climate change adaptation; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Reduced GHG emissions; Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Greening the economy | The City's Energy Efficiency Master Plan shows that energy usage would increase by 26 per cent by 2030 if all energy efficiency programs were removed. Instead, the Master Plan proposes a target to reduce the net energy used by buildings in the City of Sydney local government area by 31 per cent by 2030 on 2006 levels. The Master Plan shows how this can be achieved, despite significant growth in the economy and new floor space by 2030. This is equivalent to a doubling of energy productivity. The Master Plan includes 11 enabling actions to achieve this target. Implementing the Master Plan is the single biggest action the City can take to meet our target of a 70 per cent reduction in carbon emissions by 2030 based on 2006 levels within the local government area. This Plan is cost effective for society and can be acted on immediately. Implementation of the Plan is vital to ensure that Sydney remains an economically viable city where people want to live and work. | Feasibility finalized, and finance partially secured | Other, please specify: Majority Private Funded | https://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/surveys-case-studies-reports/green-reports | ||||||||||||
| 379 | Cities 2021 | 31114 | City of Sydney | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 4 | Mass Transit > Improve rail, metro, and tram infrastructure, services and operations | Light rail | Infrastructure development | Implementation | 2017 | 2020 | 663000 | Other, please specify : over 30 years | Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Reduced GHG emissions; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Greening the economy; Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water) | Light rail will play a central role in the future of transport in Sydney. It is a high capacity, reliable and sustainable mode of public transport that will ease the pressure on Sydney’s roads by reducing the city’s reliance on buses. In 2012 the NSW Government began the extension of the Inner West Light Rail line and announced the CBD and South East Light Rail project. The new CBD and South East Light Rail will travel from Circular Quay along George Street to Central Station and on to Moore Park, then to Kingsford via Anzac Parade and Randwick via Alison Road and High Street. Work on the 12km CBD and South East Light Rail route is now complete. | Finance secured | 2100000000 | (Sub)national | |||||||||||
| 380 | Cities 2021 | 31114 | City of Sydney | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | Sydney as a Sustainable Destination Partnership | Awareness raising program or campaign; Education; Stakeholder engagement; Capacity building and training activities; Development and implementation of action plan; Assessment and evaluation activities; Monitor activities; Sustainable public procurement; Verification activities | Operation | 2018 | 23000 | Projected lifetime | Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Greening the economy; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Reduced GHG emissions; Enhanced climate change adaptation | The Sustainable Destination Partnership is a collaboration of hotels, backpacker hostels, serviced apartments, cultural institutions, entertainment venues and industry influencers working together to make Sydney a sustainable destination. Sydney is Australia’s leading destination for tourists and the gateway to NSW. The tourism sector is a vital component of the city's economy and an important contributor to national and international recognition of Sydney being a great place to visit, live and work. But this popularity comes at a price with accommodation and entertainment venues creating 47% of Sydney’s commercial waste, 21% of its carbon emissions and consuming 14% of its drinking water. We are taking action. Sustainable Destination Partnership was launched in June 2018 with 40 founding members. These members represent almost half of Sydney’s hotel rooms, the majority of our well-known cultural and entertainment venues and key industry associations and supporters. Informed by the City of Sydney’s Sustainable Sydney 2030 vision, the partnership is working on projects that will reduce our environmental impact, while saving money and attracting new customers.Data in this report on emissions savings and cost of program is given on program lifetime forecast basis (FY17 to FY22) | Finance secured | 437000 | Local | https://www.sustainabledestinationpartnership.com.au/ | |||||||||||
| 381 | Cities 2021 | 31114 | City of Sydney | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 6 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | Smart Green Apartments program (key RASP action) | Assessment and evaluation activities; Development and implementation of action plan; Stakeholder engagement; Monitor activities; Verification activities; Capacity building and training activities; Education; Awareness raising program or campaign | Operation | 2016 | 7500 | Projected lifetime | Enhanced climate change adaptation; Reduced GHG emissions; Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Greening the economy; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy) | City of Sydney has developed a net zero carbon buildings roadmap for residential apartment buildings - the Residential Apartment Sustainability Plan (RASP). The Smart Green Apartments program (SGA) is a key component of the RASP. SGA works with apartment buildings to identify and implement energy and water savings opportunities, and monitor ongoing resource use.Emissions saved and cost of program data is given on program lifetime to date basis. | Finance secured | 1000000 | Local | ||||||||||||
| 382 | Cities 2021 | 31114 | City of Sydney | Australia | Southeast Asia and Oceania | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 7 | Buildings > Switching to low-carbon fuels | 100% Renewables Commitment | Development and implementation of action plan | Implementation complete | 2019 | 20000 | Per year | Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Reduced GHG emissions; Greening the economy; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water) | The City of Sydney will purchase only 100% renewable energy that’s generated by wind or solar. 100% renewable energy will power larger City-owned sites like pools and libraries and offset the carbon emissions from our small sites. | Finance secured | ||||||||||||||
| 383 | Cities 2021 | 31115 | City of Johannesburg | South Africa | Africa | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 1 | Energy Supply > Smart grid | Increase the share of renewable energy | Financial mechanism; Infrastructure development; Policy and regulation | Scoping | 2022 | 2030 | Per year | Economic growth; Greening the economy; Reduced GHG emissions | This action aims to decarbonize and optimize the electricity grid by increasing the share of renewable generation in the energy mix, investing in smart grids and battery storage, and developing a diverse energy supply portfolio to achieve the target of net-zero emissions by 2050. | Pre-feasibility study status | Public-private partnership | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 384 | Cities 2021 | 31115 | City of Johannesburg | South Africa | Africa | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 2 | Buildings > Building codes and standards | Improve the energy efficiency of new and existing buildings with the goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050 | Stakeholder engagement; Awareness raising program or campaign; Policy and regulation; Capacity building and training activities | Pre-feasibility study | 2021 | 2030 | Per year | Reduced GHG emissions; Social inclusion, social justice | This action aims to improve the energy efficiency of new and old buildings using technologies such as efficient lighting, heating, ventilation and cooling, solar water heating, heat pumps, and rooftop PV. | Pre-feasibility study status | Local | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 385 | Cities 2021 | 31115 | City of Johannesburg | South Africa | Africa | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 3 | Private Transport > Infrastructure for non-motorized transport | Promote non-motorised transport | Stakeholder engagement; Education; Infrastructure development | Pre-implementation | 2015 | 2026 | Projected lifetime | Social inclusion, social justice; Reduced GHG emissions | This action aims to encourage residents to shift from using private transport and public transport towards walking and cycling, by making changes to infrastructure and providing economic and behavioural incentives, including information campaigns. | Feasibility undertaken | Local | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 386 | Cities 2021 | 31115 | City of Johannesburg | South Africa | Africa | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 4 | Community-Scale Development > Transit oriented development | Ensure transit-oriented development | Stakeholder engagement; Policy and regulation; Awareness raising program or campaign; Financial mechanism; Infrastructure development | Implementation | 2014 | 2040 | Projected lifetime | Job creation; Improved resource quality (e.g. air, water); Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Social inclusion, social justice; Enhanced resilience | This action aims to ensure transit-oriented development by preventing urban sprawl and promoting densification through incentivizing mixed-use development. | Feasibility finalized, and finance partially secured | Local | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 387 | Cities 2021 | 31115 | City of Johannesburg | South Africa | Africa | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5 | Waste > Recycling or composting collections and/or facilities | Divert recyclables from landfill and incineration | Financial mechanism; Monitor activities; Stakeholder engagement; Infrastructure development | Scoping | 2021 | 2026 | Per year | Reduced GHG emissions; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Greening the economy; Promote circular economy | This action aims to divert recyclables from landfills and incineration through improved and enforced waste separation, the establishment of additional facilities and services to support segregated waste collection, the establishment of additional recycling facilities, and the adoption of enabling policies and financial mechanisms to ensure that all recyclables are indeed recycled. Whilst emission reduction benefits to the city are negligible, significant indirect GHG mitigation benefits will result from the utilization of recycled materials and reduced demand for raw material extraction and processing. | Pre-feasibility study status | Local | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 388 | Cities 2021 | 31115 | City of Johannesburg | South Africa | Africa | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 6 | Waste > Recyclables and organics separation from other waste | Optimise organic waste management | Financial mechanism; Stakeholder engagement; Infrastructure development | Scoping | 2021 | 2026 | Per year | Greening the economy; Reduced GHG emissions; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Promote circular economy | This action aims to optimise organic waste processing in the city. The decomposition of organic waste is the largest source of emissions in the waste sector. Improving the way it is managed, in particular by establishing alternatives to landfills, will have a significant impact on GHG emissions from the sector (although these only constitute a small part of the city’s total emissions). | Pre-feasibility study status | Local | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 389 | Cities 2021 | 31115 | City of Johannesburg | South Africa | Africa | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 7 | Water > Wastewater to energy initiatives | Enhance the sustainability of wastewater treatment | Capacity building and training activities; Policy and regulation; Infrastructure development; Monitor activities; Verification activities | Scoping | 2021 | 2030 | Per year | Enhanced climate change adaptation; Promote circular economy; Enhanced resilience; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Reduced GHG emissions | This action aims to reduce GHG emissions resulting from the treatment of wastewater in the city whilst improving service delivery and affordability for a growing number of consumers. | Pre-feasibility study status | Local | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 390 | Cities 2021 | 31115 | City of Johannesburg | South Africa | Africa | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 8 | Water > Water use efficiency projects | Improve water conveyance efficiency | Financial mechanism; Monitor activities; Assessment and evaluation activities; Infrastructure development | Scoping | 2021 | 2030 | Per year | Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Reduced GHG emissions; Enhanced resilience; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Promote circular economy | This action aims to improve the efficiency of water conveyance by installing more efficient pumps to reduce energy use, improve service delivery and reduce charges for consumers. | Pre-feasibility study status | Local | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 391 | Cities 2021 | 31117 | City of Toronto, ON | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 1 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | Better Buildings Partnership (Non-City Owned) | Assessment and evaluation activities; Infrastructure development | Monitoring and reporting | 2008 | 810000 | 4600000 | Other, please specify : As of 2020 | Enhanced resilience; Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure; Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Enhanced climate change adaptation; Disaster preparedness; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Disaster Risk Reduction; Reduced GHG emissions; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Shift to more sustainable behaviours | Buildings and Climate ChangeHomes and buildings generate about half of the greenhouse gas emissions in Toronto today. To reduce the worst impacts of climate change, the City of Toronto has a target to reach net zero emissions by 2050, or sooner. To reach the target, all existing homes and buildings in Toronto will need to be much more energy efficient than they are today. To date, the BBP has facilitated more than 2,600 projects, resulting in over 4.6 million MWh in energy savings and eliminating the equivalent of 810,000 tonnes of CO2 emissions.The programs developed through this initiative include:Home Energy Loan Program Expansion To date, the Home Energy Loan Program has received over 1000 applications and completed over 220 projects. The average value of a HELP projects is $21,000, with participants realizing energy savings of $560 per year. In 2019, homes that used HELP reduced their total average annual GHG emissions from 10.9 tonnes to 6.9 tonnes. In 2020 staff are seeking to amend the program to better support equity-seeking and vulnerable populations and provide more affordable options to homeowners. Staff are participating in a Federation of Canadian Municipalities funding opportunity to support energy loans and new prescriptive programs that will encourage residential energy retrofit in Toronto.Please see link for more details: https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/water-environment/environmental-grants-incentives/home-energy-loan-program-help/BetterHomesTO https://betterhomesto.ca/Energy Retrofit Homes Loan ProgramThe Energy Retrofit Loan program and the HI-RIS (this is an LIC program that is very similar to HELP, but for apartment buildings) retrofit improvement support program. Through its Energy Retrofit Loan program, the City offers low-interest loans to help building owners improve the energy efficiency of their buildings. All buildings located in Toronto are eligible. The City offers financing for up to 100% of project costs, at a rate equal to the City’s cost of borrowing, with repayment terms up to 20 years.Please see link for more details: https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/water-environment/environmental-grants-incentives/energy-retrofit-loans/Green Will InitiativeThe Green Will Initiative, championed by Mayor John Tory seeks to accelerate greenhouse gas emissions reductions by improving the energy efficiency of public and private-owned buildings across Toronto. A program of the City’s Better Buildings Partnership, the Green Will Initiative will see the City and property owners work together to make major strides towards addressing the climate emergency and achieve Toronto’s net-zero emissions target. Navigation Support Services:Better Buildings Navigation & Support Services provides building owners, operators, and property managers support navigating the process of improving the energy efficiency of their buildings and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. These improvements help decrease operating costs, increase occupant comfort, and improve the overall value of buildings.Link: https://www.toronto.ca/business-economy/business-operation-growth/green-your-business/better-buildings-partnership/better-buildings-navigation-support-services/Energy & Water Reporting and Benchmarking (EWRB)The Province of Ontario’s Energy & Water Reporting and Benchmarking (EWRB) regulation Opens in new window, is designed to help building owners and managers improve their building’s energy and water efficiency. Through this regulation, some privately owned buildings (greater than 50,000 square feet) will be required to report annual energy and water consumption and performance data.Full details on the regulation can be found on Ontario’s EWRB Guide (https://www.ontario.ca/document/guide-energy-and-water-reporting). The third mandatory reporting deadline has been extended to October 1, 2020 from July 1, 2020. | Finance secured | 2850000 | Other, please specify: This money is distributed as a loan and paid back with interest | https://www.toronto.ca/business-economy/business-operation-growth/green-your-business/better-buildings-partnership/ | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||
| 392 | Cities 2021 | 31117 | City of Toronto, ON | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 2 | Private Transport > Transportation demand management | Transportation Demand Management | Assessment and evaluation activities; Verification activities; Infrastructure development | Implementation | 2016 | 697000 | Per year | Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Enhanced resilience; Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure; Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Enhanced climate change adaptation; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Reduced GHG emissions | As Toronto’s population and economy grows, so does travel demand within and around the city. The Congestion Management Plan (CMP) helps better manage traffic flow, reduce delays, improve safety, and reduce fossil fuel use. Updated in 2015 for the years 2016-2020, the CMP focuses on maximizing the safety, efficiency, reliability, and sustainability of the transportation network for all users while reducing impacts on the environment. Strategies include the use of technology and data analytics, operational enhancements and increased information sharing to improve incident and event response, construction coordination, curbside management, engineering studies and more. The Plan also increases transportation demand management efforts to reduce travel demand and make the best use of the existing transportation network. In 2016, the City’s Corridor Retiming Program resulted in an estimated 80.9 million fewer vehicle stops, a 7.9% reduction in travel time resulting in 697,000 tons in greenhouse gas emissions and 3.9 million fewer litres of fossil fuels consumed by retiming 357 traffic signals. | Finance secured | 54990000 | Local | 54990000 | http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2019.IE9.6 Source Financial Impact for total 5 year Plan: https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-84104.pdf | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||
| 393 | Cities 2021 | 31117 | City of Toronto, ON | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 3 | Private Transport > Transportation demand management | Smart Commute Program | Awareness raising program or campaign; Monitor activities | Implementation | 2008 | 1500 | Projected lifetime | Improved public health; Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure; Reduced GHG emissions | The Smart Commute program, delivered by the EED, works with local businesses and organizations to promote sustainable commuting (e.g. carpooling, cycling, and public transit) to their employees. With the goal of reducing single-occupant vehicle trips, Smart Commute helps to ease gridlock, improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. | Feasibility undertaken | 1000000 | Public-private partnership | 525000 | https://smartcommute.ca/success-stories/employers/toronto/ | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||
| 394 | Cities 2021 | 31117 | City of Toronto, ON | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 4 | Buildings > Building codes and standards | Toronto Green Standard-Version 3 | Policy and regulation; Infrastructure development | Implementation | 2010 | 2908 | 20166 | Other, please specify : (2020) This does not count review for any applications submitted prior to Jan 2020 (roughly 75%). City planning was not able to accept new applications from March 16 to end of May due to covid-19 | Economic growth; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Enhanced resilience; Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Reduced GHG emissions | The Toronto Green Standard is Toronto’s sustainable design requirements for new private and city-owned developments. The Standard consists of tiers ( Tiers 1 to 4) of performance measures with supporting guidelines that promote sustainable site and building design. Tier 1 of the Toronto Green Standard is a mandatory requirement of the planning approval process.Financial incentives are offered through the Development Charge Refund Program Version 3 or Version 2 for planning applications that meet higher level voluntary standards in Tiers 2 to 4.Please see link for more details: https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/official-plan-guidelines/toronto-green-standard/ | Finance secured | Other, please specify: Regulation | https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/official-plan-guidelines/toronto-green-standard/ | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||
| 395 | Cities 2021 | 31117 | City of Toronto, ON | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 5 | Energy Supply > Transmission and distribution loss reduction | Transmission Operations Optimizer (TOO) initiative | Infrastructure development; Financial mechanism; Capacity building and training activities; Monitor activities; Sustainable public procurement; Assessment and evaluation activities | Operation | 2015 | 1256 | 16300 | Per year | Ecosystem preservation and biodiversity improvement; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure; Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Resource conservation (e.g. soil, water) | Toronto’s water treatment and supply system services 3.6 million people and consists of four water treatment plants, 18 water pumping stations, 126 pumps and 11 reservoirs and 4 elevated storage tanks. The Transmission Operations Optimizer (TOO) initiative was launched in late 2015 in an effort to minimize energy use and costs for pumping. The project combines load shifting and energy efficiency techniques to deliver financial, energy and environmental benefits and improve the overall efficiency and resilience of the system, even during unplanned downtime and demand variations. Toronto Hydro estimates the project saves approximately 16.3 GWh of electricity and reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 1,256 tonnes CO2e on an annual basis. The estimated annual savings for Toronto Water is approximately $0.7 million to $1.0 million per year.Since the initial implementation of TOO on November 9, 2015, and the following six months of User Acceptance Testing, TOO has proven electrical savings of 20 kWhrs per ML water pumped at the 14 pumping stations controlled by TOO and saved Toronto Water $1.1 million dollars annually in hydro (GL2215) costs. IBI Group's work over the years has saved Toronto four times the cost of the services provided | Finance secured | 5700000 | Local | http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2019.IE3.4 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | |||||
| 396 | Cities 2021 | 31117 | City of Toronto, ON | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 6 | Community-Scale Development > Eco-district development strategy | Strategic Development of Low-Carbon Thermal Energy Networks (District Energy) | Development and implementation of action plan; Financial mechanism; Awareness raising program or campaign; Infrastructure development; Sustainable public procurement; Stakeholder engagement; Assessment and evaluation activities | Implementation | 2017 | Projected lifetime | Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Enhanced resilience; Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure; Improved resource security (e.g. food, water, energy); Reduced GHG emissions; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Shift to more sustainable behaviours | Managing Toronto’s rapid growth requires a plan to address increasing demand for energy and related greenhouse gas emissions, impacts on infrastructure, and vulnerability during power outages. Community Energy Planning (CEP) addresses these challenges by calculating potential energy use and emissions of an area early in the land use and infrastructure planning process. CEP identifies opportunities to reduce energy demand and integrate low-carbon local energy solutions at a neighbourhood-scale. Initiatives include energy conservation, peak demand reduction, district energy systems, backup power and on-site generation of power, including the use of renewable energies. As of 2015, Toronto’s Official Plan requires an Energy Strategy to be prepared for large development proposals, and development within a Community Energy Plan area. In 2016, construction of the Exhibition Place district energy system was completed, and the City published The Minimum Backup Power Guidelines for Multi-Unit Residential Buildings to improve building resilience and residents’ safety and comfort during power outages and emergencies.District energy systems, also called low-carbon thermal energy networks, are systems that distribute thermal energy to multiple buildings in an area or neighbourhood. These systems typically consist of a heating and cooling centre, and a thermal network of pipes connected to a group of buildings. City Council's direction provided in December 2017 to advance the City's development of low-carbon thermal energy networks ("LCTEN") in Toronto as part of the implementation of goals of the Council-adopted TransformTO initiative.In 2019/2020, with financial support of Natural Resource Canada, the City invested in feasibility and design studies for 3 live projects to determine the viable of District Energy at various scales. As a result, it was determined that an area or neighbourhood-scale development requires significant density (of planned new development and existing infrastructure) and energy consumption to validate an investment in District Energy. Below a certain gross floor area (GFA) threshold, District Energy is not viable conventional solutions given Ontario's energy market. Therefore, there is a need to fuel switch to lower emission technologies instead. In learning, the City explored alternative low emission system design for smaller, affordable housing developments alongside innovative financial mechanisms with the private sector. Additionally, the City investigated alternative, low-carbon generation technologies with the ambitions of developing large, climate positive areas across the city.Generally, significant emission reductions of 70-90% from business as usual scenarios are achievable when investing in district energy solutions. Exact figures of costs and emissions are directly correlated to the size of a given development and various value engineering factors, such as system design, energy prices, construction timelines, carbon tax, grant money, and the cost of capital, play a impactful role. To help facilitate and scale deployment of LCTEN, The Council direction included the following: negotiating a joint development agreement with the Enwave Energy Corporation ("Enwave"), the preferred proponent from a solicitation process conducted earlier in 2017 at the direction of Executive Committee, based on a set of principles; developing an appropriate governance structure and operational framework for the City and Enwave's relationship; and reporting back on near term LCTEN opportunities. This ground-breaking private-public partnership has evolved to the implementation of a nodal LCTEN with a supporting commercial and governance agreement. | Feasibility finalized, and finance partially secured | Public-private partnership | https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/water-environment/environmentally-friendly-city-initiatives/community-energy-planning/ District Energy: https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/water-environment/environmentally-friendly-city-initiatives/district-energy/ | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 397 | Cities 2021 | 31117 | City of Toronto, ON | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 7 | Buildings > Energy efficiency/ retrofit measures | High-rise Retrofit Improvement Support (Hi-RIS) | Assessment and evaluation activities; Financial mechanism; Capacity building and training activities; Awareness raising program or campaign; Development and implementation of action plan; Education; Infrastructure development | Implementation | 2016 | 1700 | Other, please specify : On average/project | Enhanced resilience; Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Resource conservation (e.g. soil, water); Improved resource efficiency (e.g. food, water, energy); Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Reduced GHG emissions; Shift to more sustainable behaviours | The City of Toronto Hi-RIS program helps apartment building owners undertake building improvements that reduce energy and water consumption. This program provides financing with up to 20 year terms at competitive fixed rates to residential apartment buildings in Toronto with 3-storeys or more. Through the City of Toronto’s Tower Renewal program, the High-rise Retrofit Improvement Support (Hi-RIS) and Sustainable Towers Engaging People (STEP) programs offer expertise and financial assistance to spur energy efficiency measures that will reduce operating costs and greenhouse gas emissions, and improve residents’ quality of life. On average, each awarded project has a value of $833,000, and yields an energy savings of 19%, and reduction of 1,700 tonnes of GHG emissions annually. The City offers financing for up to 100% of project costs, at a rate equal to the City’s cost of borrowing, with repayment terms up to 20 years.Eligible projects include: Lighting retrofits, High-efficiency boilers, chillers and HVAC, Building envelope improvements, Building automation systems and controls, Heat pumps, Renewable energy projects, Energy storage, Fuel switching, Other retrofit measures/technologies | Finance secured | 10400000 | Other, please specify: Loaned by the City and paid back with interest | https://www.toronto.ca/community-people/community-partners/apartment-building-operators/hi-ris/ | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||
| 398 | Cities 2021 | 31117 | City of Toronto, ON | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 8 | Private Transport > Awareness and education for non-motorized transport | Cycling Network Plan | Development and implementation of action plan; Infrastructure development; Awareness raising program or campaign; Stakeholder engagement | Implementation | 2016 | Projected lifetime | Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Improved public health; Reduced GHG emissions; Improved access to data for informed decision-making; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Improved access to and quality of mobility services and infrastructure | The Cycling Network Plan Update maintains the originally established goals of Connect, Grow, and Renew, with newly articulated objectives and measures that correspond to each of the three overarching goals, providing additional clarity and indicators for evaluating success. The Cycling Network Plan also helps achieve a key proposed cycling policy objective in the City's Official Plan of bringing all Toronto residents within one kilometre (km) of a designated cycling route, as well as the TransformTO long-term goal that 75% of trips under 5 km are walked or cycled by 2050.Work completed in 2019 includes: • 8.8 km of protected cycle tracks on Conlins Road, Hoskin Road, Bloor Street, and Scarlett Road • 4.3 km of new bike lanes on Lawrence Avenue East and Blue Jays Way • 28.7 km of upgrades to bike lanes across the city • 0.7 km of an important trail link for the Waterfront Trail along Unwin Avenue Future work will include: • Over 120 km of new cycling infrastructure • Additional upgrades to existing infrastructure through the Vision Zero Road Safety Plan • Studies of over 70 km of routes within the near-term (2019 - 2021) for potential implementation.Please see link below for more information:http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2021.IE20.13ActiveTO and Accessibility:http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2021.IE19.12 | Finance secured | 1750000 | Local | 1750000 | http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2019.IE6.11; http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2019.IE6.11; https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/bu/bgrd/backgroundfile-141484.pdf; http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2021.IE20.13 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||
| 399 | Cities 2021 | 31117 | City of Toronto, ON | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 9 | Community-Scale Development > Green space and/ or biodiversity preservation and expansion | Strategic Forest Management Plan | Development and implementation of action plan | Implementation | 46700 | Per year | Reduced GHG emissions; Enhanced resilience; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Ecosystem preservation and biodiversity improvement; Shift to more sustainable behaviours; Disaster Risk Reduction | In 2013, City Council approved the first Strategic Forest Management Plan (2012-2022): Sustaining and Expanding the Urban Forest. The Plan highlights six strategic goals to protect and improve the urban forest, including the goal to expand tree canopy cover to 40%, achieve equitable distribution of canopy cover and increase biodiversity in Toronto.Trees provide a multitude of environmental, social and economic benefits and play a key role in creating healthy environments. Toronto has 10.2 million trees that provide the equivalent of more than $28.2 million dollars in ecological services per year and has a combined structural value of $7.1 billion, equivalent to $700 per tree.To ensure its sustainability and to preserve ecological functions, the City has set a goal of achieving 40% tree canopy cover. With more than half of Toronto’s land privately owned and 60% of existing trees located on private lands, partnering with stakeholders and private land owners is essential to maintaining and growing the urban forest.In 2016, City Council adopted two reports Growing Toronto’s Tree Canopy and Strategy to Expand the City’s Tree Canopy on Private Lands as part of the development of a tree planting strategy to encourage tree planting and stewardship on private property. The strategy, ready in 2018, focused on promotion, education, training and tree planting support programs for residential homeowners as well as industrial, commercial and institutional landowners.For more information on the various strategies being implemented please see links below:Tree Planting Strategy Link: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2019.IE9.8 | Finance secured | Local | https://www.toronto.ca/data/parks/pdf/trees/sustaining-expanding-urban-forest-management-plan.pdf | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | ||||||||
| 400 | Cities 2021 | 31117 | City of Toronto, ON | Canada | North America | 5. Emissions Reduction | Mitigation Actions | 10 | Community-Scale Development > Green space and/ or biodiversity preservation and expansion | Toronto Ravine Strategy | Assessment and evaluation activities; Stakeholder engagement; Verification activities; Awareness raising program or campaign; Policy and regulation | Implementation | 2016 | Projected lifetime | Disaster Risk Reduction; Ecosystem preservation and biodiversity improvement; Enhanced climate change adaptation; Disaster preparedness; Reduced GHG emissions; Enhanced resilience; Shift to more sustainable behaviours | Ravine Strategy Since early 2015, the City of Toronto and the Toronto and Region Conservation, in consultation with the public and a wide range of stakeholders, have been working to develop the Toronto Ravine Strategy, the first ever comprehensive strategy focused solely on Toronto’s ravines. As of 2020, there are twenty Ravine Strategy Actions to date, two have been completed, sixteen are in progress, and the remaining two are not yet started. The work of protecting, managing, and improving the ravine system will always be ongoing, and require leadership and careful attention to balancing the needs of supporting public access to ravine areas, while protecting and restoring ecological areas. The following report in the link provided below outlines steps taken by multiple Divisions to engage in that work. Link to report: https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-141693.pdfIncreasing Engagement in Ravines through Partnershipshttp://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2021.IE22.4 | Feasibility finalized, and finance partially secured | 460300000 | Local | http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2020.EX12.1 | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable | Question not applicable |
About
This information is now on Primer
All the information that is in this pane, and more, is now on Primer, in a more consumable and user friendly format. You can also edit metadata from this page.
Take me there!
Description
This dataset contains public responses to question 5.4 in the Cities 2021 questionnaire. This question covers information provided by cities on the actions they are taking to reduce their emissions in different sectors.
Activity
- Community Rating
-
Current value: 0 out of 5
- Raters
- 0
- Visits
- 64
- Downloads
- 19
- Comments
- 0
- Contributors
- 0
Meta
- Category
- (none)
- Permissions
- Public
- Tags
- Row Label
- SODA2 Only
- Yes
Licensing and Attribution
- Data Provided By
- (none)
- Source Link
- (none)
License Type
- License Type
- CDP Open Database License
